I think it means this competition isn't over.
Thats what Im worried about...
I think it means this competition isn't over.
Yep. DE would have redshirted Oz if he was totally confident with Threet.
IMO, Oz will be starter heading into the Washington game after we're 2-3. It will be the same QB shuffle as year which is gonna suck ass.
There's no point in redshirting Oz with Taylor Kelly right behind him (Kelly will definitely be redshirted barring injury problems). It allows them to put two years between Kelly and Oz. Oz was never going to be redshirted.
DE and Oz discussed him redshirting and it's on the record. It was definitely an option they considered and Oz is open to it.
Also, putting any type of faith into a months worth of practice (Taylor Kelly) is a huge stretch. He's a HUGE unknown and shouldn't play into the decision of whether or not to RS Oz.
Every QB since Rudy was supposed to be the savior and each has failed to provide a spark to the offense (I know, not all their fault). I'm not about to annoint Kelly, whose only other offer was from Nevada, as the next great ASU QB. I'm completely in the "I'll believe it when I see it" mode w/ Erickson & Co.
Don't mean to take my anger out on you but I'm clearly frustrated
I didn't see those comments, so I'll take you at your word, but I don't see how Oz could have redshirted unless Threet played every single down this year (maybe Plummer did that his junior year, but I don't think one ASU QB has taken every snap all season in the Pac-10 era). Samson can't run the whole offense because he can't throw down field with his shoulder and the only way Kelly sees time this year is if the other three guys are on crutches.
Also, you can feel comfortable that Kelly has shown great natural ability in practice this fall. He definitely belongs at this level. With some coaching, he could be REALLY, REALLY good. That said, the comparisons to Plummer were ridiculous. Plummer has decent fundamentals for a prep player and was highly recruited regionally. It came down to ASU and Stanford for his services, and Snyder had to beat back Bill Walsh to get him. Kelly wasn't that prolific, although he's probably a better athlete.
I think Oz remains a bigger project than Kelly because Oz has serious footwork issues related to his height. I'm not sure how much of Oz's footwork can be fixed, in the way it's so challenging to teach a basketball player with abnormally large hands to shoot free throws.
Erickson's plans for the No. 2 quarterback are unknown. Osweiler is the obvious choice, but it's possible - although unlikely - he could red-shirt. The quarterback was open to the idea earlier in camp.
"Definitely,'" he said. "Obviously, that's something that I haven't really thought about because the only thing I have thought about is winning that job. But in the case maybe I don't, obviously that's a viable option."
Bleck as we thought:
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/Blog/DouglasHaller/97268
The competition hasn't really be won yet. Threet has an edge, but Oz could be the guy by the time they go to Madison.
Not trying to pile on here, but why even start Threet then in the first place and have Oz miss valuable playing experience in the two warm-up games if he's the guy down the road? It makes zero sense. Eric Boateng could start at QB for ASU and it's not like they would lose to either of those FCS schools. Give the kid his reps if he's the future.
Not trying to pile on here, but why even start Threet then in the first place and have Oz miss valuable playing experience in the two warm-up games if he's the guy down the road? It makes zero sense. Eric Boateng could start at QB for ASU and it's not like they would lose to either of those FCS schools. Give the kid his reps if he's the future.
And Gadd - forgive me for taking your optimism on any QB at ASU with a handful of salt after your preseason touting of Danny Sullivan last fall.
And I stand by my assessment of Sullivan. He was not nearly as awful as people portrayed him to be
Yes. He. Was.
Not trying to pile on here, but why even start Threet then in the first place and have Oz miss valuable playing experience in the two warm-up games if he's the guy down the road? It makes zero sense.
Because I don't think there's anything to say Oz is for the guy down the road. Theoretically if Threet works out he could start every game this year, hopefully lead ASU to a low level bowl game and then next year (a year I think a lot of ASU fans have high hopes for) take ASU to a bigger bowl. Then Oz would take over his Senior season in 2012.
brock won't redshirt, i would be shocked
Yeah, very few QB's who could play elsewhere in FCS would hang around in that scenario.Oz will transfer if Threet is the starter the next two years. No way he stays for the chance the play one year.
Yeah, very few QB's who could play elsewhere in FCS would hang around in that scenario.
If I were ASU fans I'd just hope Threet takes the job and runs away with it and let the chips fall where they may in 2012 which in all likelihood does not include Osweiler.
2K yards, 10 TDs, 110 QB rating. Not even close to the worst season in ASU history. That belongs to Dan Ford (who went to a bowl game, somehow), and there are five guys behind Sullivan in the Pac-10 era.
Go back and watch the offense last year. Aside from the OL being a sieve, the receivers weren't even running the right routes and the dropped a record amount of balls. The running game was non-existent.
The problem is gone, and I'm not talking about Sullivan.
Back to Oz/Threet: The guys are almost carbon copies of each other. The difference is Threet gets what the agenda of the offense is -- get through the reads quickly and get rid of the ball. For whatever reason, the lightbulb hasn't come on for Oz yet and he clearly has accuracy problems 10 yards in, especially on the timing routes.