Suns 2024-2025 Season Discussions

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,439
Reaction score
71,069
Don't know about the league rules, but I think there's no chance they do it.

I know we all love to accuse Ishbia of having a constantly fruiting money tree, but we are never going to waive and stretch Bradley Beal.
I don’t know. Some people thought we’d never bring him off the bench either because of his salary. If the league rules would get us under that apron, and we could start signing FAs and not having our picks locked to the bottom of the first, I wouldn’t be shocked if we did that.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
120,024
Reaction score
60,591
No trade is imminent for Nick Richards per Gerald Bourguet.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,847
Reaction score
18,919
Location
The Giant Toaster
I don’t know. Some people thought we’d never bring him off the bench either because of his salary. If the league rules would get us under that apron, and we could start signing FAs and not having our picks locked to the bottom of the first, I wouldn’t be shocked if we did that.
The Suns stretched Nassir Little who was owed 3 years /$22m. He’s on the books for $3m a year thru 2030. I can’t imagine them closing that to a player who owed $110m beyond this season.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,439
Reaction score
71,069
The Suns stretched Nassir Little who was owed 3 years /$22m. He’s on the books for $3m a year thru 2030. I can’t imagine them closing that to a player who owed $110m beyond this season.
It would be a stretch, for sure.

(See what I did there?!)
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,929
Reaction score
13,116
Location
Tempe, AZ
If the Suns took on an extra year of a bad contract like Grant Williams, maybe, but it's a long shot.

Can't believe he's hurt again. Feel for him because he seems like a good dude and that's got to be frustrating as an athlete. His career is basically over with another year long injury. I think that's the 3 year in a row he's suffered from something like that.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,929
Reaction score
13,116
Location
Tempe, AZ
Because the owner wouldn't eat the money? Or because the math doesn't math?

No one would eat that much money. The stretch provision uses a calculation of twice the years plus one extra and spreads the salary evenly. So 5 years and $110 million would cost the Suns roughly $22 million annually, which is more than Nurkic's salary. No one would pay that and anyone suggesting it as a solution doesn't account for the ramifications of it over the remainder of the 2020's.
 
Last edited:

how_sweet_it_is

Veteran
Joined
Apr 21, 2022
Posts
383
Reaction score
157
Location
Earth
I am thinking that every single time a Suns team has come anywhere seriously close to a championship, it was unexpected by the rest of the league and probably by themselves. In 1976, certainly. In 1993, yeah, they had gotten Charles Barkley and earned the best record in the league; but it was nevertheless a new team with no Finals record. It had to make a dazzling comeback in the first round; it had to fight through a game 7 in the third round; and it took the Bulls to game 6 only by miracle shots in game 3. In 2010, the team was dead in the water at mid-season. It fought its way into the playoffs, exorcised its playoff demons by sweeping the Spurs; and took the superior Lakers to game 6. Would have won that game and taken the Lakers to game 7, but for one mistake by Jason Richardson. 2021 was an even more out-of-nowhere Finals run than 1993. The point is that the Suns history of playoff success is a history of teams doing the unexpected and befuddling the league.

I haven't seen the slightest evidence that this team has that in them. Pulling a miracle in the second half of the season.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,847
Reaction score
18,919
Location
The Giant Toaster
I am thinking that every single time a Suns team has come anywhere seriously close to a championship, it was unexpected by the rest of the league and probably by themselves. In 1976, certainly. In 1993, yeah, they had gotten Charles Barkley and earned the best record in the league; but it was nevertheless a new team with no Finals record. It had to make a dazzling comeback in the first round; it had to fight through a game 7 in the third round; and it took the Bulls to game 6 only by miracle shots in game 3. In 2010, the team was dead in the water at mid-season. It fought its way into the playoffs, exorcised its playoff demons by sweeping the Spurs; and took the superior Lakers to game 6. Would have won that game and taken the Lakers to game 7, but for one mistake by Jason Richardson. 2021 was an even more out-of-nowhere Finals run than 1993. The point is that the Suns history of playoff success is a history of teams doing the unexpected and befuddling the league.

I haven't seen the slightest evidence that this team has that in them. Pulling a miracle in the second half of the season.
.
The game was tied when Artest put back the Kobe air ball. We would’ve had to win in OT plus two more games. That team was inspiring but I never believed they would’ve won it all.
.
Amare/Manning’s knee , JJ’s orbital bone, Raja’s calf and Horry suspensions will always be the ones for me.
 
OP
OP
Yuma

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
23,101
Reaction score
12,879
Location
Laveen, AZ
OK. Am I missing something? Ideally the Suns trade Nurkic to get Nick Richard. Which means we have to take another player back plus give out all our assets. Arizonasports.com says technically we could trade Okogie for Richard with just a second round pick or two. Now the salaries match. So I am thinking, we could do that trade now, if the other team is willing to do it. We would still be over the second apron, but we wouldn't have the problem of moving Nurkic in the deal. The contracts match, and it is a much simpler trade. You just keep Nurkic for now, until you trade him in a separate deal. Why couldn't we just do something like that? :shrug:
 
OP
OP
Yuma

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
23,101
Reaction score
12,879
Location
Laveen, AZ
Great article. All facts, no emotion.
.
So after reading this, just focusing on this season alone, forget about draft picks, etc we would get in return. We know we would have to take on other players to make the salary match. I prefer it's not butler. Rather two or three guys, hopefully some bigs, or at least some serviceable center better than Plumlee/Oso. (Assuming we don't have Richards from a trade.)

I have long been thinking we would play better with addition by subtraction. Case in point, no Nurkic, no turn overs and better defense, and Suns have been on a three game win streak. Taking away our best scorer in Durant may work, because then we could get two bigs on the court, use Tyus to generate the offense, and have Booker and Beal as your scorers. Ideally I keep Beal coming off the bench and have someone bigger like Oneal in that starting five. I would have Booker, Oneal, Tyus, Dunn, Plumlee/(Richards)/new center from Durant trade.) Two bigs help the rebounding and defense. Oneal is a better defender and can shoot the three. Booker is our scorer, and Tyus sets the table.

That makes our bench with Allen and Beal to lead the off bench scoring.

It could work just by making us a more traditional built team. Less time waiting for Durant to iso, but the trade off is would Booker then Iso like Durant, or would he still play like point book that can give you 5 to ten assists and 27 points a night?
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,929
Reaction score
13,116
Location
Tempe, AZ
So after reading this, just focusing on this season alone, forget about draft picks, etc we would get in return. We know we would have to take on other players to make the salary match. I prefer it's not butler. Rather two or three guys, hopefully some bigs, or at least some serviceable center better than Plumlee/Oso. (Assuming we don't have Richards from a trade.)

I have long been thinking we would play better with addition by subtraction. Case in point, no Nurkic, no turn overs and better defense, and Suns have been on a three game win streak. Taking away our best scorer in Durant may work, because then we could get two bigs on the court, use Tyus to generate the offense, and have Booker and Beal as your scorers. Ideally I keep Beal coming off the bench and have someone bigger like Oneal in that starting five. I would have Booker, Oneal, Tyus, Dunn, Plumlee/(Richards)/new center from Durant trade.) Two bigs help the rebounding and defense. Oneal is a better defender and can shoot the three. Booker is our scorer, and Tyus sets the table.

That makes our bench with Allen and Beal to lead the off bench scoring.

It could work just by making us a more traditional built team. Less time waiting for Durant to iso, but the trade off is would Booker then Iso like Durant, or would he still play like point book that can give you 5 to ten assists and 27 points a night?

Did you read the whole article? It suggests VanVleet and Jeff Green for KD for salary purposes. VanVleet bumps Tyus to the bench, possibly bringing about a trade as well. Green is a bench forward who would be a serviceable PF for 10-15 minutes a night when Dunn, Royce, or whatever needs a break.

We'd likely be a play-in squad this year but those salaries are expiring. That reduces our salaries and brings us below the apron to allow for more options to move Nurkic, if he's still here, this summer.

I'd trade Tyus anywhere he wants to go for a pick or multiple swap rights down the line if he doesn't want to come off the bench. As a minimum salary signing we can trade him anywhere and they don't need to match salary sent back either so it can be straight up for a pick so long as it's not to a team over the apron.
 
Top