Suns 2024-2025 Season Discussions

Raindog

I didn't come here to be liked!
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Posts
5,539
Reaction score
7,100
Either go for it, or rebuild the team. James Jones and Mat Ishbia weren't shy about this when they made the trade for Durant.

Now all of a sudden they realize the CBA is real?
Arguably, Ishbia could be somewhat excused for being clueless about it. James Jones on the other hand...
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
121,164
Reaction score
61,695
However, Ishbia's decisions trump Jones'. Ultimately, they go in the direction Ishbia prefers.

It's hard to separate the two, though.


BY Kellan Olson, Arizona Sports, May 1 2024, Suns reporter, ArizonaSports.com editor:

“I feel really great about all the things we’ve done in 15 months. The outcome of this year’s playoff series and last year’s playoff series, let’s take those two things out of there, besides that I feel like we’ve made a lot of amazing decisions,” Ishbia said, going on to clarify those are team decisions and not just his before rattling off some of Phoenix’s correctly labeled decisions to upgrade the franchise off the court.

“You look back at some of the trades that James and all of us were part of. We do those things 100 out of 100 times. Not 99 out of 100, 100 out of 100 and we’d still do them again and I think the other 29 GMs would all do the same exact thing.”



 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
37,520
Reaction score
16,930
Location
Arizona
I'm not going to quibble over position label. The Suns needed a 4/5 and didn't address the position at the trade deadline.
A 4/5 could work but there are 5's that can't play 4's. I think we have our center. Now we need either a 4 or 4/5.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
37,168
Reaction score
17,154
Perhaps I could have said it more clearly, but I disliked the idea of giving up a first round pick to move Nurkic' contract.

Even more so since the Suns didn't address the elephant in the room, the lack of quality rotation depth at the 4/5 position.

This was a salary dump, even though it may pay dividends next season in regard to getting below the 2nd tax apron.

The idea of the Suns standing pat this season with a losing hand doesn't appeal to me.

Either go for it, or rebuild the team. James Jones and Mat Ishbia weren't shy about this when they made the trade for Durant.

Now all of a sudden they realize the CBA is real?
The big difference between us on this subject is you apparently believe there was a fix for this mess, I don't.

We need to rebuild fairly soon, I really believe that's unavoidable. But I'm not sure of the timing or the pace of that rebuild, the last thing we want to do is look like panicked sellers. I think the important thing for us to do is to make forward looking moves with each trade, draft selection and FA signing. And when the market is there, sell off our veterans.

The worst thing we can do, besides sabotaging our own players, is to give up future assets to add meaningless wins. I'm so thrilled that we didn't do that at this deadline. I was convinced we were going to bring in someone like Jonas at the cost of a pick and Allen. It would have marginally improved us in the short run but would not have been forward looking. That we may have finally showed some restaint gives me hope.
 

clyde2tw

All Star
Joined
Jan 27, 2023
Posts
714
Reaction score
722
Location
abroad
I believe the fix is not in the roster change so much so as change in game philosophy. When we share the ball, our offense flows, when we resort to ISOs, our offense is easily figured out by good def. teams. Bad offense, lots of TOs, leads bad defense due to transitions. We have enough star power, def. more so than many teams now and in history (did Pacers have another star next to Reggie Miller?). If we start empowering players Beal, Allen, Jones more and stay away from ISOs as much as possible, there is a chance to succeed even with this roster.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
37,168
Reaction score
17,154
I believe the fix is not in the roster change so much so as change in game philosophy. When we share the ball, our offense flows, when we resort to ISOs, our offense is easily figured out by good def. teams. Bad offense, lots of TOs, leads bad defense due to transitions. We have enough star power, def. more so than many teams now and in history (did Pacers have another star next to Reggie Miller?). If we start empowering players Beal, Allen, Jones more and stay away from ISOs as much as possible, there is a chance to succeed even with this roster.
I'm not sure whether I'd agree or challenge what you're saying here. I guess, I would first have to ask what you mean by "succeed?
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
121,164
Reaction score
61,695
The big difference between us on this subject is you apparently believe there was a fix for this mess, I don't.

We need to rebuild fairly soon, I really believe that's unavoidable. But I'm not sure of the timing or the pace of that rebuild, the last thing we want to do is look like panicked sellers. I think the important thing for us to do is to make forward looking moves with each trade, draft selection and FA signing. And when the market is there, sell off our veterans.

The worst thing we can do, besides sabotaging our own players, is to give up future assets to add meaningless wins. I'm so thrilled that we didn't do that at this deadline. I was convinced we were going to bring in someone like Jonas at the cost of a pick and Allen. It would have marginally improved us in the short run but would not have been forward looking. That we may have finally showed some restaint gives me hope.

There is no guaranteed fix for this mess. The Suns have traded many of their most valuable draft assets, so it's choosing the best way forward without them.

The Suns actually did give up a first round pick to trade Nurkic so that is one less future first round pick. IMO, if a team is going to trade a first round pick, trade it for a position of need or not at all.

There were a number of centers the Suns could have added for minimal or no assets except money, but they decided to ignore the problem. At least they could have made the product more palatable on the floor this season. Losing does not breed confidence and is even more likely to make the Suns look like panicked sellers this summer unless they can miraculously right the ship.

At this point, the Suns do not really have much choice but to rebuild part or all of the team, but I do not have a lot of confidence the leadership will make the right decisions.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
37,168
Reaction score
17,154
There is no guaranteed fix for this mess. The Suns have traded many of their most valuable draft assets, so it's choosing the best way forward without them.

The Suns actually did give up a first round pick to trade Nurkic so that is one less future first round pick. IMO, if a team is going to trade a first round pick, trade it for a position of need or not at all.

There were a number of centers the Suns could have added for minimal or no assets except money, but they decided to ignore the problem. At least they could have made the product more palatable on the floor this season. Losing does not breed confidence and is even more likely to make the Suns look like panicked sellers this summer unless they can miraculously right the ship.

At this point, the Suns do not really have much choice but to rebuild part or all of the team, but I do not have a lot of confidence the leadership will make the right decisions.
Yes they could have made the product more palatable on the floor this season. I'm so thankful they didn't. When we trade Allen I want future value for him, not an extra couple of wins. When we trade Booker, I don't want a 30 year old star, I want future value. And so on.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
121,164
Reaction score
61,695
Yes they could have made the product more palatable on the floor this season. I'm so thankful they didn't. When we trade Allen I want future value for him, not an extra couple of wins. When we trade Booker, I don't want a 30 year old star, I want future value. And so on.

You seem locked onto trading, Allen. I don't think we are on the same page.

If the Suns do rebuild, they need to do it the right way, for sure.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
37,168
Reaction score
17,154
Well, reaching 2nd round of playoffs?
Yeah, I could see that being within reach if we could get Durant to play within a team concept. But for me, I want to see this team building towards a championship and I don't see how that can happen given our questionable depth, our future pick deficit and the second apron restrictions. So to me, anything other than tearing it down and restocking the roster and the pick cabinet, is failure.
 

clyde2tw

All Star
Joined
Jan 27, 2023
Posts
714
Reaction score
722
Location
abroad
Yeah, I could see that being within reach if we could get Durant to play within a team concept. But for me, I want to see this team building towards a championship and I don't see how that can happen given our questionable depth, our future pick deficit and the second apron restrictions. So to me, anything other than tearing it down and restocking the roster and the pick cabinet, is failure.
It's not mutually exclusive. If we perform better with this group then our players could also gain trade value, from Allen, RO to Beal
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
121,164
Reaction score
61,695
Yeah, I could see that being within reach if we could get Durant to play within a team concept. But for me, I want to see this team building towards a championship and I don't see how that can happen given our questionable depth, our future pick deficit and the second apron restrictions. So to me, anything other than tearing it down and restocking the roster and the pick cabinet, is failure.

I'm not disagreeing, but if the Suns rebuild, it's kind of like get a number and stand in line.

So many young, talented teams are ahead of us. And they own their own draft picks, plus many others they have accumulated.

I'm hoping for a good summer where the Suns can improve their team, maybe keep Booker, and add young players and draft picks.

However, I am concerned the Suns have products reaching their expiration date with depreciating value.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
37,168
Reaction score
17,154
It's not mutually exclusive. If we perform better with this group then our players could also gain trade value, from Allen, RO to Beal
True and I want this group to play as well as possible, for trade value but also just for viewing enjoyment. I just wouldn't consider it a "success". And I'd be very disappointed if slightly better play the next few months led to our front office trading away younger players and/or picks to try and build on that improvement.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
18,393
Reaction score
13,838
Location
Tempe, AZ
I agree with @Mainstreet , Nurk's contract wasn't toxic or a real negative for the Suns since they're well over the 2nd apron. Trading him didn't get us below that line and it doesn't get there in the off-season either. We could have held onto him and dealt him as an expiring in the off-season since the Suns aren't winning this year and did nothing to improve their odds. Arguably they lowered their odds by trading away Nurkic for more wings when we need bigs. If Nurkic became a negative in the locker room then finding out why should have been step one and rectifying that should have been step 2. Instead he's sat with no communication, he feuds with the coach, and then he's labeled as a cancer. You can't scapegoat a player and expect them to roll with it like it never happened.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,738
Reaction score
71,736
True and I want this group to play as well as possible, for trade value but also just for viewing enjoyment. I just wouldn't consider it a "success". And I'd be very disappointed if slightly better play the next few months led to our front office trading away younger players and/or picks to try and build on that improvement.
After already trying to trade KD, when we don’t make the playoffs this year, I’m pretty sure they’re going the blow up route. Maybe not with KD and Booker, but KD ain’t gonna want to keep playing on a loser.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
37,168
Reaction score
17,154
After already trying to trade KD, when we don’t make the playoffs this year, I’m pretty sure they’re going the blow up route. Maybe not with KD and Booker, but KD ain’t gonna want to keep playing on a loser.
I think so too, at least to the extent they trade KD. Unfortunately, I'm afraid they may still try to rebuild on the fly around Devin though and that solves little.
 
Top