Chaplin
Better off silent
LOL, yeah. Thanks for this post. Brought me back down to earth.we definitely need to get on that podcast...
Apologies to Ouchie...
LOL, yeah. Thanks for this post. Brought me back down to earth.we definitely need to get on that podcast...
LOL, yeah. Thanks for this post. Brought me back down to earth.
Apologies to Ouchie...
When that much salary goes out, the salaries must still within a certain percentage of each other, regardless of whether the team taking on more salary has extra cap room.
I believe they have to be within twenty percent of each other. Which sounds like a lot, but when you start matching up these trades it can get infuriatingly small.
Are these for season ticket holders only?
Where do you envision Hunter playing? I'm not at all convinced he can move to the 4 spot in the NBA. If we don't sign Oubre, he could play the 3/4 like Kelly does but otherwise he'd probably normally swing between the 3 and the 2 like Bridges does.
Exactly! When you have an overabundance of Small Forwards, you don't worry about giving up two of them to fill a greater need.But neither SF is particularly good, the Suns have two better SFs, and the number six pick is of questionable value.
In my opinion, sixth pick in a crappy draft, one NBA-level SF, and one young SF are a small price to pay for the best defensive PG in the NBA who can also score. This is especially true when you have two better SFs and only about one half of an actual NBA point guard. This would be an absolute steal for the Suns. They would literally have ideal point guard and small forward(s) to play alongside Booker. That's a whole lot of defense between Holiday, Oubre, Bridges, and even Johnson and Melton further down in rotation.
Exactly! When you have an overabundance of Small Forwards, you don't worry about giving up two of them to fill a greater need.
The greater need is becoming a winning team. By not having to play Small Forwards at Power Forward all season long, leaving
Ayton as the lone big man.
Aren't Sarver and his cronies getting rich enough? Their investment has lucked into a billion dollar windfall.Yes, that is the greater need. But you don't get rich by giving away money. And you don't make your team better in the long haul by making decisions that only consider current needs. I'm speaking in general here, not weighing in on whether we should give away a couple of small forwards
NBA tv says we’re getting Garland.
The Knicks reportedly locked on Barrett after working out Garland.
Adrian WojnarowskiVerified account @wojespn
Vanderbilt guard Darius Garland had his workout with the Knicks today, but New York remains locked on selecting Duke’s RJ Barrett with the NBA Draft’s third overall pick on Thursday, league sources tell ESPN.
1:50 PM - 19 Jun 2019
NBA tv says we’re getting Garland.
You must be registered for see images
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Aren't Sarver and his cronies getting rich enough? Their investment has lucked into a billion dollar windfall.
And considering the Suns futility over the past decade, generalizations haven't helped. They apparently
need to consider current needs to finally take the step out of the cellar, then look ahead.
I like Naz Reid at 32. I don’t watch a lot of college outside of the PAC and the tourney but I watched this guy a few times an he has a sweet 3 point shot.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
YupHe is also a banger. Reid is one of a handful on my radar at 32.
In my opinion, Hunter is the perfect stretch 4 to match with Ayton.
I agree with the substance of what you wrote above. But what I quoted didn’t state what you are saying above. It changed it from discussing a package including Warren for Jrue to Warren for Jrue.What is going on this board today? Do you really feel you need to lecture ME about how to post?
If people want to get a good player--no matter who it is (in this example Jrue was being discussed)--then you need to give up assets that the other team would think is valuable. Outside of the mediocre value of our #6 draft pick, TJ Warren is easily the best tradable asset we have. Do you agree or disagree? People want to have their cake and eat it to. GUARANTEED that any trade for any "star" player will include TJ Warren at the very least. The very LEAST. There is no way in hell we could acquire Russell, Jrue or any other star type player WITHOUT getting rid of TJ Warren. And arguments that he is "too valuable" to let go basically invalidate any discussion about acquiring that level of player.
I think Warren's improvement in 3point shooting make him worth keeping, however, he is 100% expendable if we can get a PG in return. Period.
And they’re going to do nothing. Or worse, something stupid.Ya it's been an aggressive day today, and I mean I've been part of it too I think some of us are just getting antsy for the sun's to do something
No worries. The funny thing is we fundamentally agree on the substance of the discussion.LOL, yeah. Thanks for this post. Brought me back down to earth.
Apologies to Ouchie...
Yeah it's all context. Funny thing is, and I brought this up earlier on a Politics thread, if we were just a bunch of guys sitting at a bar talking about the Suns in person, guaranteed all these conversations would be much different, and certainly much more cordial.No worries. The funny thing is we fundamentally agree on the substance of the discussion.
AMENYes, that is the greater need. But you don't get rich by giving away money. And you don't make your team better in the long haul by making decisions that only consider current needs. I'm speaking in general here, not weighing in on whether we should give away a couple of small forwards