- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Posts
- 11,660
- Reaction score
- 844
What happened to Michael Redd? Why did we let him go?
I would much rather have him than Dudley or Brown!
I would much rather have him than Dudley or Brown!
Its horrible. And his team was better when he got buried on the bench.
points per shot is a flawed statistic because it takes freethrows into account
it tells you nothing about shooting efficiency. Beasley shot 45% from the floor and 37% from 3 while scoring over 19ppg. That is clearly good. He didn't get to the line that is all.
if you score 19+ppg on 45%+ FG and 37% 3s you are not inefficient.
Must be hard for you to understand that points per shot is no measure of efficiency at all.
Player A makes 5 of 10 FG and 0 of 0 FT so he scores 10 points on presumably 10 posessions. 1 point per shot.
Player B makes 3 of 10 FG and 5 of 12 FT so he scores 11 points on presumably 16 posessions. 1.1 point per shot.
Who was more efficient Player A or B? Not sure you need the answer.
And why even bash Beasley for his defense? He is not even the worst defender in the starting lineup.
Go look at true shooting percentage if you want effeciency numbers.
51% TS is terrible. Not being able to get to the line is a major flaw in a primary scorer.
You can spin that any way you want, you are not getting around the fact that points per shot are not a measure of efficiency at all.
If you score 19 per game on 45%FG and 37%3s you are not inefficient and I am done arguing with you if you think otherwise.
Go look at true shooting percentage if you want effeciency numbers.
And why even bash Beasley for his defense? He is not even the worst defender in the starting lineup.
slin,
What games are you watching? Beasley stands out as the worst defender - and I think he's actually trying some of the time now. Wait until he is miffed about something. He doesn't use Warrick's trick of switching off on a weak screen so a teammate has to cover his man for him (yet) but he's nearly as clueless.
Given who's speaking I know you're going to say that Gortat is much worse on defense... could it be even you are embarrassed to make such a such a claim when you could be vague?
slin,
What games are you watching? Beasley stands out as the worst defender - and I think he's actually trying some of the time now. Wait until he is miffed about something. He doesn't use Warrick's trick of switching off on a weak screen so a teammate has to cover his man for him (yet) but he's nearly as clueless.
Given who's speaking I know you're going to say that Gortat is much worse on defense... could it be even you are embarrassed to make such a such a claim when you could be vague?