Trust me I know it can’t be answered . Because in answering that all your doing is showing that your holding him to a standard nobody in the history of the NBA has ever met.
It's not that hard to quantify. basketball-reference.net gives breakdowns of where shots are attempted from and what the accuracy is in each range.
Over his career, Ayton has taken 48% of his shots from a distance of 0-3 feet (dunks and layups), and 25% of his shots from 3-10 feet (in the paint, more or less). Only 27% of his shots are from more than 10 feet.
From 0-3 feet, he converts 75%. From 3-10 feet, he converts 51%.
To choose one comparison, only 29% of Jokic's attempts are right at the rim, and another 30% are from 3-10 feet. 41% are from farther out.
Jokic's conversion from 0-3 feet is 70%, although that overall number is dragged down by his first few years, when he did much less well at the time. His conversion from 3-10 feet is 55%. So it's a bit of a wash between him and Ayton from close range -- Ayton better right at the rim, Jokic better when he has to execute something skilled.
Both players' numbers are higher this year than their career averages, by comparable amounts.
The numbers do call into question this board's obssession with Karl-Anthony Towns. Towns takes 33% of his shots from 0-3 feet at 24% from 3-10 feet, lower even than Jokic. And he doesn't do particularly well on them: 71% at the rim, 48% in the paint.