RON_IN_OC
https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Let her rip.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I definitely weighed this vs Mahomes vs a Steve Wilks defense. Mahomes won.Crazy that the line hasn't moved much in this game. My BetMGM app says 80% of the moneyline bets and like 70% of the spread bets are coming in on KC. I'd be interested to know how Vegas hedges that much one-sided risk, unless a lot of the money is tied to unlikely parlays or something.
I would have bet Mahomes if he were the favorite. As an underdog and his pedigree, it almost seems like they are giving away money at this point. KC has beaten two really good teams that are more complete than KC on their way to the SB, and I expect them to do it again against SF.Crazy that the line hasn't moved much in this game. My BetMGM app says 80% of the moneyline bets and like 70% of the spread bets are coming in on KC. I'd be interested to know how Vegas hedges that much one-sided risk, unless a lot of the money is tied to unlikely parlays or something.
I definitely weighed this vs Mahomes vs a Steve Wilks defense. Mahomes won.
It seems crazy, but when was the last time the narrative was this obvious and Vegas came out on the wrong side?I would have bet Mahomes if he were the favorite. As an underdog and his pedigree, it almost seems like they are giving away money at this point. KC has beaten two really good teams that are more complete than KC on their way to the SB, and I expect them to do it again against SF.
Good question.It seems crazy, but when was the last time the narrative was this obvious and Vegas came out on the wrong side?
Crazy that the line hasn't moved much in this game. My BetMGM app says 80% of the moneyline bets and like 70% of the spread bets are coming in on KC. I'd be interested to know how Vegas hedges that much one-sided risk, unless a lot of the money is tied to unlikely parlays or something.
Is the 80% of the number of bets or the money amount? I could see there being more bets for KC but the money being similar due to the 49ers being the silicon valley team. A $1000 bet cover 10 $100 ones.Crazy that the line hasn't moved much in this game. My BetMGM app says 80% of the moneyline bets and like 70% of the spread bets are coming in on KC. I'd be interested to know how Vegas hedges that much one-sided risk, unless a lot of the money is tied to unlikely parlays or something.
Since playoffs started purdy has giving defenses 2-3 int chances. If trend continues chiefs defense has to advantage of these chances. Give mahomes chances to put more pts up on wilks subpar defense.The key is:
Can KC's secondary convert all those interceptions that Detroit and GB dropped?
There are lots of websites that click deeper into this than I can look at, but with so much action on the Super Bowl, I think it all comes out in the wash.Is the 80% of the number of bets or the money amount? I could see there being more bets for KC but the money being similar due to the 49ers being the silicon valley team. A $1000 bet cover 10 $100 ones.
Wilks defense, I believe, was the #3 scoring defense in the league this year. Not sure I would call that subpar. Yes, Detroit had one good half but one half does not tell the story. I know people around here like to cling to false narratives but you may wish to consider letting this one go.Since playoffs started purdy has giving defenses 2-3 int chances. If trend continues chiefs defense has to advantage of these chances. Give mahomes chances to put more pts up on wilks subpar defense.
Yea they started off hot but these last couple weeks they haven't looked sharp with all the talent they got. especially run wise. packers were getting anything they wanted to. I have total belief Andy Reid is not stressing over wilks coached defense giving him something he cant out scheme. especially with 2 weeks to prepareWilks defense, I believe, was the #3 scoring defense in the league this year. Not sure I would call that subpar. Yes, Detroit had one good half but one half does not tell the story. I know people around here like to cling to false narratives but you may wish to consider letting this one go.
How is that a false narrative?Wilks defense, I believe, was the #3 scoring defense in the league this year. Not sure I would call that subpar. Yes, Detroit had one good half but one half does not tell the story. I know people around here like to cling to false narratives but you may wish to consider letting this one go.