- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 87,525
- Reaction score
- 38,774
It can be called naïve but God what a dumb kid.
What was that load of crap they were feeding him about he had no votes on the jury? And why did he buy it? Erik never played or backstabbed (voting strategically to keep yourself in is not backstabbing) anyone on the jury. He was the only one was genuinely surprised by the blind sides. He was still there because he won challenges plain and simple.
Those women did a happy dance all over his misplaced sense of duty, everyone on survivor tells everyone else what they want to hear darling Erik, it is one of the constants in the game and as a Survivor fan you should have KNOWN that. I know your young but wake up sweetie, if you don’t women are gonna walk all over you for the rest of your life.
From the beginning Erik played the game with a big helping of hero worship and that is why he will go home without the prize. I really believe that had he kept himself in it by continuing to win immunity he would have won the whole dang thing.
Oh well now we get to watch the rest of the group devour themselves; should be entertaining.
Totally agree I think most of the people on the present jury would have voted for him because the women were the ones organizing the blindsides not him.
Honestly he acted like a kid who's allowing a woman to use him because he thinks he'll get lucky as a result? Just very weird.
the worst part is he knew they were lying to him he asked why can't you trust me without giving up immunity and then he bought the half ass excuse.
You have to give Cirie credit for realizing he might be stupid enough to fall for that plan.