the boldin two point conversion play and tim rattay touchdown

freebyrd

Registered User
Joined
Jun 18, 2003
Posts
3,358
Reaction score
0
Location
fresno
man we got too cute there don't ya think?
when i saw rattay come in i was like wtf?
but it worked, when i saw boldin at QB i was like wtf? and it stunk

creative? yes
smart in that sort of game situation? i'm not so sure
what was your reaction?
 

dogpoo32

meh
Joined
Nov 14, 2004
Posts
7,216
Reaction score
23
Location
Albuquerque, NM
man we got too cute there don't ya think?
when i saw rattay come in i was like wtf?
but it worked, when i saw boldin at QB i was like wtf? and it stunk

creative? yes
smart in that sort of game situation? i'm not so sure
what was your reaction?

I agree with the TD, but the 2 pointer, as you said, was too cute. Congratz to Tim on the TD. A QB should have been in there on the 2 pointer, or Q should have tried to run it in. The D had it sniffed out perfectly. Did Whis think they would just get confused and sit down?
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,304
Reaction score
1,181
Location
SE Valley
huh> warner was on the bench. it got them thinking run, which is why pope was wide open.
Alan was referring to the extra point attempt.

Regarding the extra point I think that the Cards/Boldin were thinking pass too strongly, rather than run/option pass. There was a very good cut-back lane available inside had Boldin been looking and seen it I think he would have gotten it into the end zone...
 
OP
OP
freebyrd

freebyrd

Registered User
Joined
Jun 18, 2003
Posts
3,358
Reaction score
0
Location
fresno
yeah i forgot about tim at wideout, that was really too cute:bang:
 

RedViper

Registered
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Posts
1,742
Reaction score
19
Location
Flagstaff
I'm fine with it. I love how this staff doesn't run the same predictable, BS that never had any chance whatsoever of working. See the regimes of Bugel, Ryan, Tobin, and Mac for examples. Going for it on fourth down instead of kicking the safe FG, not allowing the game to turn into a complete route once we go down by fourteen, all this stuff is completely new for this team. I absolutely love it. To me the coaching is night and day, from what I've been conditioned to expect during the past fifteen years. This team doesn't give up. Teams don't know what to expect from us. We are completely unrecognizable from what we've been. I'm totally down with it
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,296
Reaction score
6,310
Location
Dallas, TX
Q made a bad throw. Fitz was open in the back of the endzone. A little more lob Q.
 

redbirdofwar

Newbie
Joined
Jul 26, 2004
Posts
37
Reaction score
0
I think Rattay had to be on the feild. If the #3 Qb takes a snap w/o the #2 on the feild, the #1 can't come back in. Right?
 

jmt

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 24, 2002
Posts
3,240
Reaction score
820
Location
Reston, VA
I'm fine with it. I love how this staff doesn't run the same predictable, BS that never had any chance whatsoever of working. See the regimes of Bugel, Ryan, Tobin, and Mac for examples. Going for it on fourth down instead of kicking the safe FG, not allowing the game to turn into a complete route once we go down by fourteen, all this stuff is completely new for this team. I absolutely love it. To me the coaching is night and day, from what I've been conditioned to expect during the past fifteen years. This team doesn't give up. Teams don't know what to expect from us. We are completely unrecognizable from what we've been. I'm totally down with it

Ditto!
 

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
I agree with the TD, but the 2 pointer, as you said, was too cute. Congratz to Tim on the TD. A QB should have been in there on the 2 pointer, or Q should have tried to run it in. The D had it sniffed out perfectly. Did Whis think they would just get confused and sit down?

I agree. Kurt should have been the QB in that situation, IMO. I think Whiz outsmarted himself there.
 

LVCARDFREAK

In the league 20 years!
Joined
Mar 3, 2003
Posts
6,360
Reaction score
1
Location
Vegas
Ridiculous call. Then take a guy who doesnt play QB and roll him to the right taking half the field away and clogging the lanes. That play had no chance at working.
 

moklerman

Rise from the Ashes III
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
5,318
Reaction score
810
Location
Bakersfield, CA
Cutesy crapola. The only thing that play "might" have had going for it was the element of surprise but that was gone since they lined up in that formation earlier in the game. Why Whis was hell-bent on running that stupid ass play is beyond me.

That "trick-em" crap isn't what you should call when the game's on the line. Run a short yardage play and give the team a chance to finish.
 

Evil Ash

Henchman Supreme
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Posts
9,757
Reaction score
1,987
Location
On a flying cocoon
Ridiculous call. Then take a guy who doesnt play QB and roll him to the right taking half the field away and clogging the lanes. That play had no chance at working.

Actually it did. Fitz was open but Q threw it short. If he throws it higher, Fitz gets it with ease.
 

green machine

I rule at posting
Joined
Sep 4, 2002
Posts
6,126
Reaction score
11
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Actually it did. Fitz was open but Q threw it short. If he throws it higher, Fitz gets it with ease.

By the very definition of "working" the play did not, because whether Fitz was open or not (and he certainly was) the player designed to get him the ball failed to do so.

Still, I have no problem with the play call because I think it had as good a chance of any play to work.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
Q made a bad throw. Fitz was open in the back of the endzone. A little more lob Q.

Fitz sure was wide open by 5 yards. Thing is he was in a line of sight that Bolden should have easily seen him. Bolden is not a QB so he is not going to see everything. He was wired to look for one guy or run and that was it. If it had worked we would all be singing the prasies of Whiz. He made a tough call and it did not work. I doubt he will try that again anytime soon.
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,603
Location
Generational
By the very definition of "working" the play did not, because whether Fitz was open or not (and he certainly was) the player designed to get him the ball failed to do so.

Still, I have no problem with the play call because I think it had as good a chance of any play to work.
Agree
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,293
Reaction score
11,926
Fitz sure was wide open by 5 yards. Thing is he was in a line of sight that Bolden should have easily seen him. Bolden is not a QB so he is not going to see everything. He was wired to look for one guy or run and that was it. If it had worked we would all be singing the prasies of Whiz. He made a tough call and it did not work. I doubt he will try that again anytime soon.

I loved the play call. I just wish that Rattay would have gone in motion. With Rattay near the center when the ball is snapped would have thrown the defense in a panic IMO.
 

jmr667

Random Poster
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
481
Reaction score
0
Location
Chandler, AZ
Dunno about the 2-pt conversion. It was a long shot no matter what play/formation they called. The 'Skins D is pretty good.

I liked the Rattay touchdown though. Down less than a yard from the endzone, bring in Rattay. Everyone assumes its because they want to run QB sneak but Warner is just too damaged to do it. When Rattay dropped back to pass the D looked like it just froze in confusion.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
556,464
Posts
5,436,037
Members
6,330
Latest member
Trainwreck20
Top