If the reports so far are accurate, then we may be picking off the scrap head and get what we get.
All of the options have their warts, that is the truth. In terms of what I believe they bring to the table, I guess a lot of it depends on the staffs they bring with them. As a head coach, I need someone to bring in top staff, develop players, hold players accountable, earn their respect, and execute a joint plan with Steve Keim. Arians was successful IMO because he was able to do most of these things.
Honestly, Munch didn't have a great run in Tennessee, but it is a cheap franchise. I don't love that he has either been a position coach or a head coach, never a coordinator. That isn't a deal breaker, but it is something.
Wilks has been in the NFL since 2005 but only one year as a coordinator. He is talked up a bit, but mostly a mystery.
John DeFilippo has an even more limited resume. He has never been a head coach at any level, and has only been a coordinator for two years, once in college and once in the pros.
Jim Schwartz might have the best resume of the bunch. He has been a scout, positional coach, coordinator and a head coach. Also, he is only three years older than Wilks. Now, his run in Detroit was bad, and his rumored attempt at a coup in Philly this year is also a bad look.
In the end, none of these guys set the room on fire when you look at their resumes. If you are excited for any one of these candidates, you either have extremely inside info, or you just like an article or report you have read about them. None have had success as a head coach at any level. Only Schwartz has more than two years as a coordinator at the NFL level. Any confidence in the hire that is made has to be based on trust in the Cardinals front office and owner because it isn't in the info provided to the public. They are hiring a projection based upon human leadership qualities vs actual experience or resume.