NoelPHX
Space for Sale
One thing Durant may give us that we don't have is more free throw opportunities and more respect from the refs.
Yeah he still gets to the line with regularity.One thing Durant may give us that we don't have is more free throw opportunities and more respect from the refs.
One thing Durant may give us that we don't have is more free throw opportunities and more respect from the refs.
Paul can’t get to the rack anymore. If it wasn’t for the rip thru he’d rarely go to the line. He’d age better with another shot creator.I thought CP3 would do that but I was wrong. The Suns took almost 300 fewer FT from the year before Paul to Paul's first year as a Sun. They won 17 more games despite that drop in attempts.
Paul can’t get to the rack anymore. If it wasn’t for the rip thru he’d rarely go to the line. He’d age better with another shot creator.
KD has been a fantastic player. He has a 4-year contract. Let's just say you get the same productivity out of him the next 2 years as he has had the last 2 years, is it worth it considering what we are giving up?
This is a little disingenuous. Durant is under contract for four years. Likely two big years and I’d expect two years of still competent play. And decade of bridges is conjecture. I’ll bet the number of players that spend a decade with a single team these days is REALLY small.
For me it comes down to this:
No matter how well bridges plays he’s never going to win you a championship. He won’t you lead you there. He will contribute to one, but not lead.
Durant could absolutely lead a team to a championship with guys like Booker and Paul on it.
That’s a HUGE difference.
A bit premature, but it happens, I'm told.Is it possible to have buyers remorse already?
Is it possible to have buyers remorse already?
Gambo shot this down and said “no” either because he knew this 3 way trade was against league rules or likely because Ainge told him it was because of Simons and Dons contracts. Therefore, it couldn’t be "finalized tomorrow" or in the works for that matter. It’s no secret he does talk to Ainge. He has had him on multiple times over the years too.This was probably already posted. Gambo's response to Flex's impending trade tweet. It's an open secret that Gambo has a clear line of communication with Ainge. It seems pretty clear Mitchell is not being moved by the Jazz.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
That no could just mean not tomorrow for all we know.This was probably already posted. Gambo's response to Flex's impending trade tweet. It's an open secret that Gambo has a clear line of communication with Ainge. It seems pretty clear Mitchell is not being moved by the Jazz.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I don’t think they’re giving up both twins. And I wouldn’t be surprised to see the jazz throw in a player we could use like bogdanovich or clarkson.I want us to find a way to make this work, but I don't think Paul, Durant, Booker and a bunch of 1 year contract guys wins a title... I don't think they even pose a real threat to do so. There needs to be a supporting cast in play.
Gambo shot this down and said “no” either because he knew this 3 way trade was against league rules or likely because Ainge told him it was because of Simons and Dons contracts. Therefore, it couldn’t be "finalized tomorrow" or in the works for that matter. It’s no secret he does talk to Ainge. He has had him on multiple times over the years too.
This was a similar scenario as the KD trade. At the time of that Tweet it was impossible that the Suns had an opportunity or be in the right place at the right time at the time of the Tweet (KD hadn't made up his mind or had contact with the Nets). Again, he likely heard something from a player or someone in the org about this scenario, embellished and ran with it too. In this instance, he really got caught with his pants down because this trade wasn't possible let alone could be "finalized tomorrow". Flex tried to save face with a follow up Tweet saying ohhhh if Simmons is moved after he got called out by several people and Gambo shot this down.
Don’t worry his Flexers will find a way to ignore this too.
This is the latest tweet I see from John Gambadoro.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Sounds like Gambo is playing both sides of the fence
This is the latest tweet I see from John Gambadoro.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
You don't see the obvious difference? Gambo is saying the Utah has interest in Ayton in sign and trade. He is not putting out there a 3-way trade that is obviously illegal. Big difference. So, no Finito he is not playing both sides. He was shooting down the 3 way trade that CANNOT happen by NBA rule.Sounds like Gambo is playing both sides of the fence
aaljy ok.
You don't see the obvious difference? Gambo is saying the Utah has interest in Ayton in sign and trade. He is not putting out there a 3-way trade that is obviously illegal. Big difference. So, no Finito he is not playing both sides. He was shooting down the 3 way trade that CANNOT happen by NBA rule.
Again, it appears Flex took some liberties to predict what he heard.
That's not what I said. The combination of Simmons and Don's contracts is what makes the trade against NBA rules not the fact it's a 3 way trade. They are both on max rookie deals. Per CBS Sports:Three way trades are not illegal.
They are if they violate the rule about number of players with rookie max extensions. That one had Simmons staying out with nets which meant couldn’t receive Donovan.Three way trades are not illegal.