The "future" QB conundrum...

Bobcat

Registered User
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
1,969
Reaction score
2
Location
Glendale, Arizona
I would rather leave the selection of our next QB to our Current Head Coach BA.
Not Kent, Dan, Mike or Gambo, but BA. He knows what he likes and can develop them to succeed.

So all of you want to be ESPN sports Gurus heed your desires.

BOBCAT

:mulli: :bang:
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,506
Reaction score
16,733
Location
San Antonio, Texas
I believe that Slanidrac, K-9, and conraddobler all have made some very good points. My feelings are that you are ALWAYS on the look to improve your QB situation.

We made a huge leap last off-season with the acquisition of Carson Palmer. He was head and shoulders above anyone on our roster, and though aging, he should be available to us for the next few years. He has won over our other players, and they will work tirelessly for him. That is very important. He has the trust of our coaches, and they have been very patient with him, and will continue that tact. He IS our QB of the now, (and the near future) for us. He can take us to a super bowl, (and win it).

That said, we should scour the prospects this year, both in free agency, and in the draft, and IF there is one who piques the interest of the FO and the Staff, we should make an attempt to acquire him in order to upgrade our backups. This study should be made each year, (though a selection should only be made if it is readily apparent that the player would be an actual upgrade). Thus, it should not necessarily be an annual event to take a QB, but the search should be made, and an acquisition made IF it is a believed upgrade to the status that year. Not every year will require an actual acquisition.

This has been pretty much the way New England has operated, and they have been successful. I am confident that Keim and BA have been contemplating this all along, and that they will continue to do so. This is the true function of the FO and scouting department, not just for the QB, but for the entire roster. We made something like 93 player transactions this past season. Each one was designed to improve our roster status, or to replace a player lost to injury etc. I don't see Heim, Licht and BA as ever becoming stagnant in working to improve our roster. That cannot be said of 'any' previous Front Office that I can recall with this team.

I agree with you but including the Patriot's habit of doing it is moot, because for the most part they have had Tom Terrific for what seems ages :)
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,658
Reaction score
18,665
Location
The Giant Toaster
Johnny will screw up all his interviews, the kid is arrogant and full of himself... but this brash kid can win in the NFL. I can't stand him as a person one bit but he is going to be a franchise QB. Do we trade up for him or another QB? I say no, I say get a pass rusher or a TE if our venture into getting a LT in free agency is accomplished. We have Palmer and he will be better next season with a year under BA's system. The man is not great but can be good for at least the next two years and this defense of ours rocks. You go with what you have as a team and 10-5 in the first year suggests that there is a window no matter how small. You win now :)

He does fine in interviews and on the set at the CG. There's no way he's gonna "bomb" his interviews at the combine IMO. Besides they're all coached up for the process.

I think he will be able to name a play unlike Killa Cam...
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
16,150
Reaction score
8,237
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
I bet Manziel goes top 10.

The whole "take the best player available whether it's a QB or a CB" I think was fine for when we were a bad team (last several years) but if were serious about competing in the west I think we have needs that need to be addressed early in the draft.

IMO needs are to be addressed in free agency, and the draft is for getting the best players available no matter their position.
 
Last edited:

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
Comes down to who has the best FO staff.

And I have a ton of faith in Keim. If he does, or does not, take a QB in this draft, then I will trust his pick. Especially with BA on board, who has an eye for QBs weve lacked in the past.



Im a huge proponent of finding that future franchise QB. A young guy you build (doesnt necessarily have to be great right this second, he can be groomed). But no at the cost of a valuable draft pick if the odds are against the guy.

Regarding this draft, I do not expect any to be available to us after the frenzy in the top 10. Nearly all those teams need a QB.

And so with so many QBs being taken this year, you have to expect those same teams wont be taking a QB next year...which will be our shot to get a good one.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,506
Reaction score
16,733
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Comes down to who has the best FO staff.

And I have a ton of faith in Keim. If he does, or does not, take a QB in this draft, then I will trust his pick. Especially with BA on board, who has an eye for QBs weve lacked in the past.



Im a huge proponent of finding that future franchise QB. A young guy you build (doesnt necessarily have to be great right this second, he can be groomed). But no at the cost of a valuable draft pick if the odds are against the guy.

Regarding this draft, I do not expect any to be available to us after the frenzy in the top 10. Nearly all those teams need a QB.

And so with so many QBs being taken this year, you have to expect those same teams wont be taking a QB next year...which will be our shot to get a good one.

Unless your me and I see us picking at number 32 drinking a tall one of crazy Kool Aid :)
 
Top