- Joined
- Jan 2, 2003
- Posts
- 91,314
- Reaction score
- 68,290
I've watched all Mavs games last year and this year with the exception of three of them. I completely agree with your assessment(s) as well. Mavs without Luka are somewhere between the Suns last year and Suns this year (minus Booker). Let's say Ayton and Pozingis cancel each other out. The next best players on the two combined rosters are Rubio and Oubre. Baynes is probably the next one. Kleber and Powell are about the same as Saric and Kaminsky. Hardaway and Lee were New Yorks throw-away players, essentially crap that Mavs had to take to acquire Pozingis. Brunson, Wright, and Finney-Smith are good backups, but nothing more on a good NBA team. Frankly, Rubio, Oubre, and Baynes are significantly better, and the next three Suns rotation players may be better. That would be what...Bridges, Cam and Tyler Johnson?
If you take Booker and Luka out of the picture, it's not even close. Next four out of five best players are on the Suns roster, and it gets pretty even the rest of the way. Think about it this way- would you trade Rubio, Oubre, or Baynes for anyone on the Mavs roster not named Doncic or Porzingis? Hell, I am not sure I'd trade any of them for Porzingis until I see what he can do in a season where he is fully healthy. I'd probably swap our two PF stiffs for Kleber and Powell, but that's about it.
Luka is a hell of a player, and what he is doing with the Mavs is incredible for anyone, let alone a kid who is not old enough to drink yet.
couldn't agree more. people are contorting themselves into pretzels trying not to give Luka credit for being such a massive impact player so far.
the idea that that Mavs team with an average PG would be a 35-40 win team really strains credulity. That means you have to believe this team would win 35-40 games:
Rubio
Hardaway Jr.
Dorian Finney-Smith
Kristaps Porzingas
Dwight Powell
No, F'N way.
And, even if that Mavs team above could win 35-40 games (which again seems incredibly far-fetched considering that doesn't look all that much better than the Knicks when Porzingus was actually VERY GOOD and the team was still atrocious), the current Mavs squad, is on pace to 55 games, which means substituting Luka for an average PG would net the team around 15-20 more wins on the season.
yes, he's bad on D, but he is absolutely phenomenal this season on offense. And I sure as hell don't remember the same people who have found ways to denigrate Doncic because of his D do the same when we had Nash.