The Lying Game: Trufant, Newman or Suggs?

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Jurecki now claims that Cards are torn between Trufant, Suggs and Newman. They also like Kennedy a lot.

They love Trufant. What do they do if they can't trade down and it's between 2 of the 3?

He says the buzz out of Felon Town is: Newman or Robertson. Feels the Bears might take Suggs.

Cards also have not been scared off of Newman.
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
14,867
Reaction score
7,114
Location
Mesa, AZ
Originally posted by JeffGollin
Jurecki now claims that Cards are torn between Trufant, Suggs and Newman. They also like Kennedy a lot.

They love Trufant. What do they do if they can't trade down and it's between 2 of the 3?

He says the buzz out of Felon Town is: Newman or Robertson. Feels the Bears might take Suggs.

Cards also have not been scared off of Newman.

I think this all means the Cards will draft the top K in round one...using the smokescreen theory.
 

Mr. Boldin

Mel Kiper's Daddy
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Posts
1,634
Reaction score
284
If we get Trufant I will run around town screaming and yelling in joy!
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,973
Reaction score
26,457
I'd be flabbergasted if we passed on the best pass rusher to take a CB. Maybe if we had signed Holliday or Colvin I could see it. I'd rather us take Leftwich than either CB with Suggs still on the board and I'm against Leftwich as our first pick.
 

RedStorm

Next NY Gov
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,618
Reaction score
2
Location
Gilbert
I agree. We need a pass rusher. (or two) I believe that two out of our first three picks will be DT and DE. Quite possibly the first two. Then WR etc....
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,523
Reaction score
7,801
I can see us taking Trufant.Only because he'd be the worst possible pick for us and Cardinal history shows that's what we'll do.Mcgiinis said on the audio that you can never have enough cover guys.Look back to January 5th,did anyone want Trufant or Robetson?The answer is,no,to both of them.What's changed?The Cards added to their secondary.They re-signed their DTs'.Trufant was a 2nd rounder and now we want him.If we don't take Leftwich or Suggs then the Graves is even a bigger idiot than i think.Now if they are both gone then WR would be my next choice.If the draft went Leftwich,Newman,Rogers,JOhnson, and Suggs then ,maybe ,i would consider Trufant.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,506
Reaction score
16,733
Location
San Antonio, Texas
It's all good

Suggs, Trufant, Newman, Kennedy, Leftwhich it all gives the Cardinals a good player and hopefully we will never be in this good of a position to draft again. I DO NOT WANT PALMER, I DO NOT WANT PALMER and finally I DO NOT WANT PALMER!
 

BuckeyeCardinal

Cantankerous Curmudgeon
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Posts
2,252
Reaction score
0
Re: It's all good

Originally posted by Jetstream Green
Suggs, Trufant, Newman, Kennedy, Leftwhich it all gives the Cardinals a good player and hopefully we will never be in this good of a position to draft again. I DO NOT WANT PALMER, I DO NOT WANT PALMER and finally I DO NOT WANT PALMER!

I'd rather have Robertson or even Kennedy before Trufant....but I won't kick him outta bed for eating crackers.

Newmans shoulder injury scares me......but I still want Suggs.

If I ranked those that I would pick it would go like this:

Suggs
Robertson
Kennedy
Leftwich
Trufant
Newman
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,071
Reaction score
3,343
Re: Re: It's all good

Originally posted by BuckeyeCardinal
I'd rather have Robertson or even Kennedy before Trufant....but I won't kick him outta bed for eating crackers.

Newmans shoulder injury scares me......but I still want Suggs.

If I ranked those that I would pick it would go like this:

Suggs
Robertson
Kennedy
Leftwich
Trufant
Newman

I pretty much agree with your wish list. I would flip Kennedy and Trufant but as you stated about crackers and bed I would take any of these players. What I hope for the most is that the Cards can trade down and still get anyone of these players, even if that means missing out on Suggs.
 

Ed B

The Matt Joyce of Posting
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
1,978
Reaction score
4
Originally posted by JeffGollin
Jurecki now claims that Cards are torn between Trufant, Suggs and Newman. They also like Kennedy a lot.

They love Trufant. What do they do if they can't trade down and it's between 2 of the 3?

He says the buzz out of Felon Town is: Newman or Robertson. Feels the Bears might take Suggs.

Cards also have not been scared off of Newman.


My last mock draft has Trufant #1 and I stand by that. It's really hard <b>not</b> to love the guy.
 
Top