The Warriors (remake)

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,292
Reaction score
23,503
Location
Killjoy Central
The Warriors (2006)

Being redone by Tony Scott.

Old Variety article (08/2004):

Variety is reporting Terence Winter has been enlisted to write the script for the upcoming remake of the 1979 Walter Hill movie, "The Warriors." Tony Scott ("Man on Fire") is set to direct.

Michael Beck and James Remar starred in the original movie, which was adapted by Walter Hill and David Shaber from a novel by Sol Yurick. Released in 1979, the warring gangs of New York concept captivated audiences.

Scott's been linked to "The Warriors" since signing on to direct the new version two years ago. Scott's Scott Free Productions, MTV Films and Paramount Pictures are backing the project.

:|
 

Cardinal Bob

Glutton for Punishment
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Posts
2,451
Reaction score
279
Location
Garwood, NJ
The Warriors
The Hills Have Eyes
The Longest Yard
The Stepford Wives
Day Of The Dead
Inspid Sequel: (Insert number here)

Can anybody in Hollywood write an original script any more?!!?!?!?!?!? :shrug:
 

JPlay

JPlay
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Posts
1,211
Reaction score
0
Go to the Blood Hood, then the Crip hood, then all of the Mexican hoods. any which way, you're dead.
 
OP
OP
Brian in Mesa

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,292
Reaction score
23,503
Location
Killjoy Central
'Warriors' Remake Without The Baseball Furies And Those Bad-Ass Mimes? Oh Yes - Tony Scott-directed flick set in L.A., with Bloods, Crips taking place of Hi Hats, Punks.

WESTWOOD, California — "Domino," Tony Scott's upcoming Keira Knightley-starring action flick about a lethal bounty hunter, will give fans of the director the chance to cozy up with some familiar offerings: hyper-violence, rapid editing and a plethora of severed limbs and drug hallucinations. While sitting down for an interview to promote the film, the 61-year-old English auteur brandished a heartwarming smile, peering out from beneath a faded red baseball cap that could brag of more years in Hollywood than his current leading lady.

Scott is a man who no doubt appreciates the virtues of familiarity. As the discussion turned to his upcoming high-profile remake of the 1979 cult classic "The Warriors," however, Scott made it clear that his ball cap might be the only recognizable thing on the set.

"The opening of 'The Warriors' now begins on the Long Beach Bridge, and it's going to look like the L.A. marathon," Scott said of the script, which relocates the story of the titular gang attempting to get home to its turf after being mistakenly accused of murdering a rival gang leader. "You'll still get the same story, but we're reconstructing the family, reconstructing the characters, and I'm doing it in L.A. The original was in New York and everything went upwards; L.A. goes [length-wise]. And instead of 30 gang members, there's going to be 3,000 or 5,000."

Scott revealed that he intends to do away with such warring factions as the Baseball Furies (a bat-wielding group of thugs dressed in makeup and MLB-worthy uniforms), the Punks (chain-wielders in hillbilly overalls) and the Hi Hats (bad-ass mimes wearing top hats). The decision, which will no doubt stir up controversy among die-hard fans currently snatching up newly released "Warriors" action figures at mall stores nationwide, is largely due to the director's recent meetings with actual L.A. gang members, whom he employed onscreen in "Domino" and intends to use again for "Warriors."

"I sat with all the gang members and they said, 'If you can get this movie on, we'll do a treaty between all the warriors, all the different gangs,' " Scott said proudly. "It's very different from what the original is like. I love the original, but this is a very different tone and a very different feel. The encounters will be more like 'Kingdom of Heaven.' It will be the Warriors stacking up against 3,000 gang members.

"The story is so generic, it's like these guys are at point B and they need to get back to point A," Scott said of the similarities between the two films, which will virtually end after the title, concept and name of at least one major character. "It's contemporary; it's going to look like the L.A. riots, with fires burning after Cyrus gets shot at the beginning.

"Everything else that we're doing, what I'm bringing to it, it's a different movie," he added, saying that authentic tattoo-sporting gangbangers will replace fictional organizations like the Savage Huns and the pimpish Boppers. "It will be the Bloods, the Crips, the Vietnamese, the 18th Street [Gang], all the boys. It will be all the major gangs in Los Angeles, and we're going to try to get them to stand on the Long Beach Bridge."

The comments by the "Man on Fire" director also put to rest Internet rumors that the remake would be largely martial-arts oriented, implying instead that the action will be of the bare-knuckles and drive-by-shootings variety.

When "Domino" lands in theaters October 14, Scott said that "Warriors" fans should pay close attention to one particular scene if they want a taste of the tone of his remake. "You had [one of the real-life gangs] in 'Domino,' the 18th Street Gang. When [Keira Knightley's character] does the lap dance [to convince some street thugs to drop their weapons], they're all the boys, they're all the real thing, and they were fantastic."

Saying that he's "still a little ways off with this one," Scott insisted that no name actors had been cast. He added, however, that he is on track to roll cameras "next year."

Adding that he's got "enough outrageousness in the real people," Scott admitted that although he enjoys the flamboyant gangs in Walter Hill's original film, the Baseball Furies will be permanently stranded in the on-deck circle. So, when ill-tempered gang member Luther recites his famously taunting quote, "Warriors ... come out to play," he'll likely be confronted by a very different group.

That is if Luther — or even that line of dialogue — survive the remaking process.

---------------------------------------------------------------

If he's going to make it so different, just call it a new film and not a remake. :rolleyes:
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,262
Reaction score
38,321
I'll watch it the original is a classic although when you watch it now it's pretty hilarious.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Cardinal Bob said:
The Warriors
The Hills Have Eyes
The Longest Yard
The Stepford Wives
Day Of The Dead
Inspid Sequel: (Insert number here)

Can anybody in Hollywood write an original script any more?!!?!?!?!?!? :shrug:
Um, yeah. I think so. Here's a list of the top-10 films right now. Not a single remake on there (there is one sequel, though). Remakes may be becoming more common, but they are still pretty uncommon in the whole scheme of things.

Why does a remake bother people so much?


1. Just Like Heaven $16.5M
2. The Exorcism of Emily Rose $15.3M
3. Lord of War $9.2M
4. The 40-Year-Old Virgin $5.8M
5. Cry Wolf $4.6M
6. The Transporter 2 $4.0M
7. The Constant Gardener $3.7M
8. Red Eye $2.9M
9. March of the Penguins $2.6M
10. Wedding Crashers $2.5M
 

Warlordaz

Native Arizonan
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Posts
27
Reaction score
0
Remakes happen because Hollywood, unlike 20 years ago, is looking for the biggest flash in the pan that can sustain itself for at least 3 weeks in the #1 spot and stay in the top ten for 2 months before starting to move on. The biggest problem is people deciding to stay home and watch DVDs rather than venture to the theatres to sit through advertisements, other patrons' bad habits, and inflated concession stand prices.

Stephen J. Cannell is talking about doing a remake of The A-Team with a new cast reset for Gulf War/Desert Storm veterans. He has already locked down a cameo from Mr.T.
In Cannell's paraphrased words, this will not be cartoony like the TV show. It will be more realistic and people will get shot and die.

There are many rumors as to who will play who. The most expensive cast rumor has George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Jim Carrey, and either Michael Clarke Duncan or The Rock as the A-Team.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Warlordaz said:
There are many rumors as to who will play who. The most expensive cast rumor has George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Jim Carrey, and either Michael Clarke Duncan or The Rock as the A-Team.
That's one heck of a cast! :thumbup:
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,193
Reaction score
16,570
Location
Round Rock, TX
Warlordaz said:
In Cannell's paraphrased words, this will not be cartoony like the TV show. It will be more realistic and people will get shot and die.

There are many rumors as to who will play who. The most expensive cast rumor has George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Jim Carrey, and either Michael Clarke Duncan or The Rock as the A-Team.

That cast will never happen. I could see Clooney, Brad Pitt and Duncan in the film, but there's no way Jim Carrey would play Murdoch--the money just wouldn't be there. Maybe Steve Carrell... ;)
 

Warlordaz

Native Arizonan
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Posts
27
Reaction score
0
Carrell isn't loony enough .... Even Will Farrell couldn't pull off, you would actually need someone younger, remember Face was a Lieutenant ... Seann William Scott, a guy who can take himself seriously when he isn't... or Johnny Knoxville playing the role

More realistically, you will see The Rock as BA Baracus, Jason Lee as Face, and George Clooney as Hannibal...
Remember: Face would routinely get his ass stomped in a fight, Hannibal would do well, Murdoch was ok for the most part, and BA was relatively unstoppable.

The question becomes do they add in Amy Allen and/or Dishpan Santana?
 
Top