This is why Blake was our best choice:

AzCards21

Registered User
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Banned from P+R
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Posts
18,054
Reaction score
61
Location
What?
Per ESPN:


After letting Jeff Blake take the Arizona Cardinals' starting quarterback job, Kordell Stewart accepted a two-year deal to take over as the Bears' starting quarterback.

Stewart, released by the Steelers last month, considered making a visit to the Baltimore Ravens, but instead of letting the Bears reopen their search for a new starting quarterback, Stewart took a shorter term deal than had been discussed.

The two-year deal is believed to worth around the same $2.5 million a year that Blake received Wednesday from the Cardinals. It includes a $1.75 million signing bonus and will pay him $3.25 million this year.

Stewart, 30, was scheduled to make $6.3 million with the Steelers, but they released him because Tommy Maddox had taken over last season as the team's starting quarterback. Stewart replaces Jim Miller as the Bears' starting quarterback.

"When you aren't satisfied with the long-term money, you then accept the shorter term contract,'' Stewart's agent, Leigh Steinberg, said.

What appealed to Stewart about the Bears situation more than the Ravens job is that there is less likelihood that Chicago will use its first-round choice on a quarterback. The Ravens might use the 10th pick on a quarterback.

"Kordell had a visit to Baltimore scheduled for Monday, but there is a real chance that they could draft a quarterback with the 10th pick," Steinberg said. "Second, you have Chris Redman sitting there. Having just come from the Tommy Maddox situation, that didn't work for Kordell."

Steinberg's feeling is that if Stewart does well in the first year with the Bears, the team will want to negotiate a long-term deal next season.

Stewart played eight seasons in Pittsburgh and has been to three AFC Championship games and one Super Bowl. He was a second-round pick of the Steelers in 1995 who hit the playing field first a little more as a receiver than a quarterback.

He first became a regular starter in 1997. The Cardinals offered him a four-year deal at little more than $12 million, but Stewart wouldn't accept. Hoping at some point to get back to the $5 million to $6 million range annually, Stewart took the shorter term deal with the hope of eventually obtaining the longer term contract.

At 30, Stewart is young enough to get those big numbers again.

John Clayton is a senior writer for ESPN.com.


Why is Stewert so worried about a team drafting a QB? Because he knows his chances of beating him out are minimal? That does not in any way fit what we need here. If competition scares you then get the he** out and sign with.........well the Bears. I like Blakes attitude and how he took the challenge instead of backing away. The Cards made the best choice.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,486
Reaction score
34,455
Location
Charlotte, NC
Originally posted by AzCards21
Per ESPN:


After letting Jeff Blake take the Arizona Cardinals' starting quarterback job, Kordell Stewart accepted a two-year deal to take over as the Bears' starting quarterback.

Stewart, released by the Steelers last month, considered making a visit to the Baltimore Ravens, but instead of letting the Bears reopen their search for a new starting quarterback, Stewart took a shorter term deal than had been discussed.

The two-year deal is believed to worth around the same $2.5 million a year that Blake received Wednesday from the Cardinals. It includes a $1.75 million signing bonus and will pay him $3.25 million this year.

Stewart, 30, was scheduled to make $6.3 million with the Steelers, but they released him because Tommy Maddox had taken over last season as the team's starting quarterback. Stewart replaces Jim Miller as the Bears' starting quarterback.

"When you aren't satisfied with the long-term money, you then accept the shorter term contract,'' Stewart's agent, Leigh Steinberg, said.

What appealed to Stewart about the Bears situation more than the Ravens job is that there is less likelihood that Chicago will use its first-round choice on a quarterback. The Ravens might use the 10th pick on a quarterback.

"Kordell had a visit to Baltimore scheduled for Monday, but there is a real chance that they could draft a quarterback with the 10th pick," Steinberg said. "Second, you have Chris Redman sitting there. Having just come from the Tommy Maddox situation, that didn't work for Kordell."

Steinberg's feeling is that if Stewart does well in the first year with the Bears, the team will want to negotiate a long-term deal next season.

Stewart played eight seasons in Pittsburgh and has been to three AFC Championship games and one Super Bowl. He was a second-round pick of the Steelers in 1995 who hit the playing field first a little more as a receiver than a quarterback.

He first became a regular starter in 1997. The Cardinals offered him a four-year deal at little more than $12 million, but Stewart wouldn't accept. Hoping at some point to get back to the $5 million to $6 million range annually, Stewart took the shorter term deal with the hope of eventually obtaining the longer term contract.

At 30, Stewart is young enough to get those big numbers again.

John Clayton is a senior writer for ESPN.com.


Why is Stewert so worried about a team drafting a QB? Because he knows his chances of beating him out are minimal? That does not in any way fit what we need here. If competition scares you then get the he** out and sign with.........well the Bears. I like Blakes attitude and how he took the challenge instead of backing away. The Cards made the best choice.

I already posted this and said basically the same thing on another thread....:D

http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=7096
 
OP
OP
A

AzCards21

Registered User
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Banned from P+R
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Posts
18,054
Reaction score
61
Location
What?
Well crud. See how work gets in the way of quality posting? :D

At least we agree. Now go read pennicles post! Number three!
 

pinnacle

Registered User
Joined
Sep 29, 2002
Posts
2,911
Reaction score
1
Location
arizona
my post was ripping on steinberg..I had to suffer through his interview on the radio the other day..I think he seriously overestimated the value of kordell..his comment that basically we had a higher offer from the cardinals..but kordell wanted to play in chicago got me going..if we REALLY wanted kordell we would have went after him after the blake visit..instead..we took the offer off of the table and signed blake.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,455
Reaction score
25,350
Originally posted by pinnacle
my post was ripping on steinberg..I had to suffer through his interview on the radio the other day..I think he seriously overestimated the value of kordell..his comment that basically we had a higher offer from the cardinals..but kordell wanted to play in chicago got me going..if we REALLY wanted kordell we would have went after him after the blake visit..instead..we took the offer off of the table and signed blake.

Purely Steinberg trying to save face by putting that spin on it. What it really looked like was after we signed Blake they got desperate and said, "Oh, ****! Didn't expect that! We'd better take what we can get."
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,298
Reaction score
1,171
Location
SE Valley
I believe that Jeff Blake is a far better "choice" for the Cardinals than Stewart. I am happy they got him, and not Kordell who would have caused re-occurring visions of Plummer type plays!!

Funny thing is... had Stewart accepted the Cards offer initially we would have never gotten to Blake. I gotta say that this is one time that DUMB LUCK has worked in the Cardinals favor.

Maybe things are changing around here!
 

AZ1766

Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2002
Posts
388
Reaction score
0
Location
Alabama
I believe Blake was a better signing than if we signed Kordell, but he still has to prove it was.....I didn't know Blake was still in the league 2 years ago. I just hope he makes a believer out of us all.
 
Top