- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 90,640
- Reaction score
- 42,686
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Went to HS in Perth, graduated, was discovered by US guy, who moved him to Sydney and re-enrolled him in HS apparently.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_mediaBefore the draft, Thon Maker's guardian Ed Smith told me that reddit yearbook photo was from an English school in Perth, not a high school.
Isn't his brother a basketball prospect as well in HS this year? Wonder how old he really is?
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
He looks good.
I want to believe he is 19. His face still looks really young imo and what makes the whole faked age story more unlikely is that he has a younger brother who would also have to a have fake id.. I'd like to think that Australian immigration offices can tell the difference between 5 year olds and 10 year olds.
Or Serge Ibaka's. Or Bismack Biyombo's. Hell maybe even Joel Embiid.I wonder what Hakeem Olajuwon's real age is
Or Serge Ibaka's. Or Bismack Biyombo's. Hell maybe even Joel Embiid.
I don't see why it matters.
You can be a 19 year old superstar or a 24 year old superstar.
You can be a 19 year old bust or a 24 year old bust.
Basket doesn't care how old you are. Within the arc is 2 points. Outside is 3 points.
Well, until you're proven, of course it matters. Scouts are trying to estimate what these guys will become once they are more experienced and once they have fully matured. If you're fully matured and have that much experience then you need to be rated for who you are now not who they think you'll become. And if you're lying about your age, that hinders their ability to make fair evaluations.
That's just a difference in opinion to scouting approach.
You draft for potential. Maybe he becomes a superstar.
I draft for what is right now. If the kids good, then I get a good player. He he turns into a superstar, then I got lucky.
I loathe drafting on potential. Its how we end up with Alex Len and Dragan Bender.
No, it isn't. It has nothing to do with that. This is about lying to game the system, nothing more. 19 year old players are almost always just a fraction of the player they will become at 24. And the NBA is always about drafting for potential, some are closer to their potential than others but it's always guesswork.
And we ended up with Len and Bender because we were a bad team in a bad lottery year. There were safer options both times but safer options are a dime a dozen.
Obviously it can work both ways, but the odds are far in the favor of a 19 year old being far below their peak than the 23-24 year old. Yeah there are exceptions, but far more often it is the 19 year old that has the most improvement left in them.I agree that the whole "potential" aspect of evaluation sometimes misses what a player actually is right now. It also assumes a player is likely to develop, which is never a guarantee. A 19 year old player could have hit his peak. A player at 23 could still improve. Its alright to consider potential, but it can be way overblown.