sorry Shane, but Boldin's missed major portions of 2 seasons (and would be a third if not for the bye, and still could be) while Dansby's missed a game here and there. LBers get nicked up and will miss a game, but WR who miss sustained portions of the season AND are older, shouldn't be the priority, especially considering that we've a) seen the offense completely shine without him and b) despite people saying Q's the "heart and soul" of the team, since this team finally stopped being a joke over the last two years, our three biggest victories have come with him on the sidelines.
Yes Boldin in one season missed 6 games and in another missed 4. I like how you added in the could be a third if not for the bye like that has some bearing on it. Dansby has missed 2 games in two different seasons and one game in each of the others. Im sure I could find you plenty of PB caliber LB'ers that have played plenty of 16 game seasons in there first four years if you really want me to so we can compare?
Are you really claiming that Q's freak near beheading in NY has anything at all to do with him being injury prone? I could see the toe injury or the knee? But this one Come on bro? That is quite the stretch. Especially if you are going to blame a guy for having the balls to do what he does. Which no other WR on this team does as far as we know yet.
Im Just trying to get your mindset. When you say that the team shouldnt let its best young talent leave then you turn around and say get rid of Boldin? I see that you think he isnt much of an impact. Although I hardly see how 27 catches 360 yards and 5 TD's in 4 games is very little impact?
Do you know how well the D performed in those games without Dansby? Because I truly cant remember off hand?