Cardinals.Ken
That's Mr. Riff-Raff to you!
Honestly...the only artists, studios, or record labels that have to fear the loss of revenue from downloadable content are the ones who's work sucks.
Myself, and those like me, are not opposed to spending money on quality product. It's the fact that costs are so high for various forms of entertainment that it becomes prohibitive for the average consumer to take the risk on inferior product.
For example: I downloaded Dark Knight, and watched it the evening before release. It was so good that I saw it three times in the theatre, and I purchased the blu-ray the day of it's release. It was the same case with the latest Star Trek film, and The Watchmen. On the other hand, I downloaded Superman Returns, watched it and never spent another cent on it.
Moral of the story? Don't make **** product, or if you do, stop charging an arm and a leg for it and you'll nip internet piracy right in the bud.
Just my opinion.
Myself, and those like me, are not opposed to spending money on quality product. It's the fact that costs are so high for various forms of entertainment that it becomes prohibitive for the average consumer to take the risk on inferior product.
For example: I downloaded Dark Knight, and watched it the evening before release. It was so good that I saw it three times in the theatre, and I purchased the blu-ray the day of it's release. It was the same case with the latest Star Trek film, and The Watchmen. On the other hand, I downloaded Superman Returns, watched it and never spent another cent on it.
Moral of the story? Don't make **** product, or if you do, stop charging an arm and a leg for it and you'll nip internet piracy right in the bud.
Just my opinion.