I just think there will be better options there for where we're picking. For instance, if a top 5 LT is there possibly....or maybe Kyle Wilson as groomed for #2 cb AND p/k returner.
I don't disagree with there could be better options in terms of players, but going by history under the Whisenhunt regime, they typically tend to address the biggest need(s) first.
2007 - Levi Brown
There was nobody at tackle and just traded Leonard Davis.
2008 - DRC
The cupboard was bare at corner.
2009 - Beanie Wells
The returning rusher at the time had a 2.8 YPC.
2010 - ???
Glaring needs thus far - NT, WILB
The question is do you reach for a nose or a ILB? I think at both positions there is a sizable dropoff after the first two or three guys.
How do you rate Kindle and Weatherspoon against him? Final qestion....do you think Haggins could translate to WILB IF we went a Graham or Kindle first.
Kindle is an elite athlete, plays the run well and has upside regarding pass rush, but has underachieved at Texas and has questions about character. Versatile, but I doubt he can play ILB. His draft stock is heavily reliant on his interviews. He could be a lotto pick or a second round guy.
In Washington vs. Weatherspoon, 'Spoon is bigger and plays the run better, but can be reckless. Washington is faster and better in coverage, but can a step too late. Both can do everything well, but neither are that impressive at shedding blocks. IMO, it's preference. 'Spoon can be an immediate starter, but Washington has more upside.
Personally, at this point I think 'Spoon is all but a lock to Atlanta and Whisenhunt's reluctance to play rookies extensively works in Washington's favor.
In regards to Haggans at WILB. He'd be better than Ali Highsmith, but him being there wouldn't strengthen my confidence in the linebackers. He should stay outside.