Denmark beats Czech Republic 2-1
I missed much of the first half. Czechia had a lot of possession box to box, but not many real chances to threaten Schmeichel.Strange game.
Denmark looked to control the game completely Except for the first 10 minutes of Second Half. Yet Czech had several random chances while Denmark couldn’t score on theirs
I can't recall a better one. the pass was better than the finish and the finish was special.Was Denmark’s Second goal the Best of the tournament?
I agree with all of this, especially now that England are wearing their scoring boots. Combine that with the games being at Wembley. That is a massive advantage. I don’t know how they can keep sancho and grealish off. For me they are better than mount right now. I think they still have a lot ahead of them, but absolutely they should beat Denmark. they need to score goals. if they do face Italy that will be a memorable final. I wouldn’t put it past Spain to pull the upset of Italy though. Italy paid a heavy toll to hold off Belgium in that last 20 minutes.Tbh, England really should be winning this now. Spinazzola being out is a massive blow for Italy. Spain are well organised but their forward options are poor.
Denmark . . .nice story and done decent players, but the good feelings can only take you so far.
England still yet to concede. Very well organised. The pairing of Rice and Phillips has been a revelation.
Some have in the past for sure, but this squad is certainly different. Everyone thought they were coming out playing boring, but in reality Southgate had a plan and has religiously stuck to it.Yeah, if England can't win basically a home tourney, there's something wrong. I have no confidence they can do it, though, even though they're looking like top dog. It's just...they choke. It's what they do.
Some have in the past for sure, but this squad is certainly different. Everyone thought they were coming out playing boring, but in reality Southgate had a plan and has religiously stuck to it.
Plus, the squad genuinely seems together. Nobody like Rooney, Gerrard, Rio or Lampard thinking they're above everyone else. No Manchester v Liverpool groups causing upset.
I'm not saying they will, but if they lose it won't be a choke it'll be because they're outplayed on the day.
I just can't see any of the team's left scoring more than possibly one goal. They're too organised.
what about Danes, Italians, and spaniards already living in the UK? there's probably a lot of them in London, perhaps enough to make an impact if their squads are playing well.UK has Locked down their borders due to the Delta-strain.
No fans of the other teams Can attend the semis and final
what about Danes, Italians, and spaniards already living in the UK? there's probably a lot of them in London, perhaps enough to make an impact if their squads are playing well.
True, England have played away only once and they will have a huge advantage over Denmark. So I read that this multinational hosting of the tournament was to mark the 60th anniversary of the competition, but the decision to arrange that was made in 2012. 2024 euro will be in Germany. You would think with COVID mitigating factors still taking place and being unique country to country, that they would have just left it in one country to minimize travel. It is kind of unique to see the event across the continent, but at the same time it is completely unfair for England to get so many home fixtures.Just reinforces what a massive advantage England has and continues to have. Italy have had one too, etc.
Out of curiosity, why is the tourney being held like this? What's the thinking behind it?
Tbf, the tournament is normally held in one sole country. This time, a few nations have had an 'advantage' as opposed to just one.Just reinforces what a massive advantage England has and continues to have. Italy have had one too, etc.
Out of curiosity, why is the tourney being held like this? What's the thinking behind it?
Yep. And the post above explains why they did it. I thought it was some kind of weird Covid thing.Tbf, the tournament is normally held in one sole country. This time, a few nations have had an 'advantage' as opposed to just one.
There are some, but I doubt a lot.what about Danes, Italians, and spaniards already living in the UK? there's probably a lot of them in London, perhaps enough to make an impact if their squads are playing well.
Problem is.. There are rules and procedures in place to move games away from high infected countries in this Euro. UEFA just chooses NOT to do it, because it one of the two most influencial countries within soccer.True, England have played away only once and they will have a huge advantage over Denmark. So I read that this multinational hosting of the tournament was to mark the 60th anniversary of the competition, but the decision to arrange that was made in 2012. 2024 euro will be in Germany. You would think with COVID mitigating factors still taking place and being unique country to country, that they would have just left it in one country to minimize travel. It is kind of unique to see the event across the continent, but at the same time it is completely unfair for England to get so many home fixtures.
There are absolutely loads of Italians. Loads.There are some, but I doubt a lot.