Errntknght
Registered User
Leaderless - off the floor and on the floor
Poor choice of words. I think there are guys on this team that worked their asses off and gave everything they had.
lottery
disappointing
disappointing
Sure there were a couple of guys, but a few guys does not a team make. This is a team that gave up on Porter the minute he tried to apply a defensive philosophy, resulting in his release for an interim coach that let's the inmates run the asylum. This is a team that can't muster up any defensive stops in close games during crunch time. This is a team that refused to play with any passion or fire in the biggest game of the season on Sunday.
Defense requires effort and effort, when your body's aching, denched in it's own sweat with legs of rubber, comes from deep down inside. It's a sad state of affairs when your best defenders are a 36 year old who's career has been derailed by serious ankle injuries and a guy who's played for 3 teams in his first 4 years in the league. Grant could have used an excuse to play poor defense, but he didn't. Amundson could have sat at the end of the bench as he did to begin the season, but he stepped up and played hard and earned minutes. What's the rest of the team's excuse?
As historically good as they've been on offense, they've been as historically bad defensively.
This team is gutless.
Gutless implies that this team had the talent to get it done but just didn't give it their all. This team lacks the defensive talent and philosophy to play good defense. Huge difference. Like I said..poor choice of words.
Agree to disagree. I think this team had the talent to play better defense, but flat out refused to do so. There's a reason why Porter didn't last the season, and it's because this team turned their back on him when he tried to instill a defensive philosophy. Read player quotes from the first half of the season. It's all there.
Wow.. your one of the few people who have looked at this roster and associated with defense. It's an ability thing. Nash could play for POP and couldn't player better defense as an example.
I agree that there are some guys on this roster that could possibly improve defensively but the guys on this roster are primarily talented on the offensive end.
If this team is ever going to get good defensively, the roster needs an enema.
Defense in basketball is more a mentality and effort than it is natural talent and/or ability.
This is one of the NBA's great myths, espoused by idiot talking-head analysts who have nothing to say and figure they'll go with something safe that they've heard a thousand times before. The same point is also often made, just as inaccurately, about rebounding.
Playing good defense requires either above average athleticism or tremendous basketball smarts, ideally both. I doubt you can find an example of a superior defender who doesn't have at least one of those qualities. Those things are, in one case, largely inate, and in the other case, acquired over years of training and commitment. It's completely unrealistic to believe that a bad defender can say to himself, "Okay, I'm going to really try this time" and suddenly become good.
(That said, defense as bad as the Suns' also requires a complete lack of accountability, and that could be addressed.)
NO, but they can be dramatically better than Leandro Barbosa!
If you can make it to the NBA, I don't think it is a stretch to assume you have some sort of Basketball Smarts. I would also argue that those apply themselves can learn to play defense... or in your words, learn basketball smarts.