This is who I wanted initially, however, I am concerned that with what we all hope and believe will be a quick turn around on that side of the ball, we will be looking for a new defensive staff in a year or two. I guess if that's the case then we will all be happy about our season.
Vance is a solid DC...
I think he'll be a possible HC again if he does well w/ the D here.Why?
Initially my thought was he would focus on D, a 3-4 guy, and honestly may have a chip on his shoulder. That being said, my knowledge of who us actually a good coach and who is not is pretty limited. Honestly , my opinions on these things are generally formed by what I read here. Scary rightWhy?
That's a good problem to have. KK needs to build his contacts across the league, so bringing in an experienced guy will help with that.I think he'll be a possible HC again if he does well w/ the D here.
one year DC, like wilks.
and a DB coach before that.
Hired as HC after one season of DC
Literally the same resume as wilks.
More importantly, you hire the heir apparent to both coordinator jobs and groom them for a seamless transition.That's a good problem to have. KK needs to build his contacts across the league, so bringing in an experienced guy will help with that.
I think it would be cool if they spent the $$ and brought in someone like a Pagano to be the assistant Head Coach and give him way more responsibility than most in this position to help grow KK and manage aspects of the management that would keep KK from the focus the O will require. If anyone saw the film Vice, kind of like Cheney's role to W.I wanted pagano because he had more experience as a DC. Oh well, I'm content with the hire.
Initially my thought was he would focus on D, a 3-4 guy, and honestly may have a chip on his shoulder. That being said, my knowledge of who us actually a good coach and who is not is pretty limited. Honestly , my opinions on these things are generally formed by what I read here. Scary right