Vikings @ Eagles

Who wins and why?

  • Minnesota

    Votes: 26 41.9%
  • Philadelphia

    Votes: 36 58.1%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

Cardinal Bob

Glutton for Punishment
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Posts
2,451
Reaction score
279
Location
Garwood, NJ
I think Philly squeaks this one out. But if the Vikes upset them, it wouldn't surprise me at all. The Eagles haven't played a meaningful game in a month, and haven't played WELL in a meaningful game since they blew out the Packers on Dec. 5th. And they still haven't proven they can beat anyone without Owens.

Philly is beatable, but I just can't bring myself to pick the Vikes to beat 'em.
 

Jersey Girl

Stand down
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2002
Posts
32,486
Reaction score
6,494
Location
Super Scottsdale
Hooray, with poll!!! :)

Eagles. They are a better team than the Vikes, even without T.O.
 

CaptTurbo

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 5, 2003
Posts
16,782
Reaction score
5
Location
Pennsylvania
Vikes.

Philly is NOTHING without TO or a decent WR I shall say.

I am rooting against them. Never "throw" a game no matter what. Bad Karma.
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,994
Reaction score
5,237
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Philly defense will shut down the Vikings also Moss is hobbling on a bad ankle and will not be a factor. Final score 24 - 10 Eagles.
 

RonF

Per Ardua Ad Astra
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
2,090
Reaction score
4
Location
Sun City, AZ
The Eagles have rested their starting unit during the last two games and Andy Reid is working on new plays that will take advantage of team strengths due to the loss of T. O. Eagles should handle the Vikes.
 

CaptTurbo

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 5, 2003
Posts
16,782
Reaction score
5
Location
Pennsylvania
RonF said:
The Eagles have rested their starting unit during the last two games .


Teams that have lost the last 2 games of the regular season have not won the superbowl. (something liek that they said on tv last saturday).
 

CardinalLaw

Registered User
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Posts
1,926
Reaction score
0
Eagles there still the same team as they where last year, only with the addition of Kearse. Eagles win by 14 or more.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,669
Location
CA
Vikes win because Eagles will come out flat, I say Vikes go up 14-3, Philly does not play well from behind.

Final Score: Min 27 Phi: 19
Even though I would like to see McNabb get to the SB
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Vikings outplayed the Eagles on MNF although they lost in the end following some very questionable calls.

I take the Vikings and I think they will make it to the superbowl actually.
 

DBACH1

Twisted Guiseppe Gallo
Joined
May 18, 2004
Posts
291
Reaction score
0
Location
St. Pete Florida
Vikings because there #1 reciever (Moss) is a little bit healthier than the Eagles #1 (Owens)

And I really dont like the Eagles.... Only reason I'd like to see them win this one is just to see them lose in the championship game for a 4th straight year
 

CaliCards

Registered
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Posts
446
Reaction score
0
This game has disaster written all over it for the Eagles but for one important player on the Vikes squad.....Moss.

If Moss is not healthy enough to play the entire first half, then the Eagles D will hold the Vikes to 14 points, and probably could score 17-21 points and win the game.

However, if Moss is healthy enough to play 3 quarters, the Vikes will put up too many points for the Eagles, thus putting the game out of reach for McNabb and his WRs.
 

Tangodnzr

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
3,837
Reaction score
5
Location
Idaho
A no brainer....

The Eagles in a cakewalk...even without TO.
 

NFL_FAN

NFL_FAN
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
423
Reaction score
0
Location
Tempe
I think it will be close. No TO means the heart of the receiving corps is gone! If the Vikings D plays like last week, Minnesota will win but who knows what Vikings team will show!
 
Top