Warner & Fitz

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
Todays "USA Today" had the stats for various positions. Kurt Warner is rated #10 in passer rating in the NFL. He has thrown 16 interceptions. Tony Romo #4 has thrown 18. Peyton Manning #5 has thrown 14. Brett Favre has also thrown 15. There are 7 other QB's who have thrown 14 or more. The three lowest rated QB's have thrown 10, 3, 7 interceptions respectively.

Larry Fitzgerald is the 5th rated receiver. Boldin does not have enough games to be rated.

Arizona is the 11th rated on team offense and 20th rated on team defense. We have given up 26 passing TD's one of the worst in the NFL. Our rushing yds per game given up is more than respectable averaging only 99.5 which is 9th. Clearly we cannot pass defend.

Top three offensive teams is no surprise: New England, Dallas and the Colts. Top defensive teams: Pittsburgh, Tampa, and Colts.

A guy could look at all these stats and do a decent job of knowing just what you should draft.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,506
Reaction score
16,731
Location
San Antonio, Texas
that is the reason I'm excited, it seems the off season tasks are as apparent as one could hope for. Sign Dansby up long term, extend Fitz, hope for the best with the rest of the FAs and attack the draft knowing weakness. Lastly, Patrick and Pope have me smiling at the TE position because I think they will be for real next year.
 

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
Arizona is the 11th rated on team offense and 20th rated on team defense. We have given up 26 passing TD's, one of the worst in the NFL. Our rushing yds per game given up is more than respectable averaging only 99.5, which is 9th. Clearly, we cannot pass defend.

But we should fire Whiz because Pendy's defense is the only thing keeping us in games. :rolleyes:

I also saw that, unless we are shut out on Sunday, this year's team will have scored more points than any other Cardinal team since 1984.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,506
Reaction score
16,731
Location
San Antonio, Texas
which makes a Warner-Lomax comparison very realistic. An immoble QB who can rack up yards if given time. I want Leinart to succeed but Warner is the best backup one can ever hope for
 

Lloydian

Registered
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Posts
747
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I love having Warner on the team. I think he's a fantastic quarterback.

Comparing his number of interceptions to players who played in more games is a bit deceiving, however. I'm looking forward to having Warner and Leinart playing regardless of who is determined to be the starter.
 

red desert

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
6,221
Reaction score
0
Location
A.B.Q. in da house
I love having Warner on the team. I think he's a fantastic quarterback.

Comparing his number of interceptions to players who played in more games is a bit deceiving, however. I'm looking forward to having Warner and Leinart playing regardless of who is determined to be the starter.

:thumbup:
 

moklerman

Rise from the Ashes III
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
5,318
Reaction score
810
Location
Bakersfield, CA
Comparing his number of interceptions to players who played in more games is a bit deceiving, however. I'm looking forward to having Warner and Leinart playing regardless of who is determined to be the starter.
It is a bit out of context but not particularly deceiving. Warner's at 3.6% INT rate. So is Romo. The "average" or #16 QB is at 3.3%(Trent Edwards). The really good QB's are mostly in the 2% range and the bad one's are in the 4%-5% range. Warner is in the bottom half at #23(out of 32).
 

Spielman

Non-Troll Rams Fan
Joined
Sep 23, 2007
Posts
767
Reaction score
0
which makes a Warner-Lomax comparison very realistic. An immoble QB who can rack up yards if given time. I want Leinart to succeed but Warner is the best backup one can ever hope for

It is a good comparison. Lomax was even more immobile. His sack rate was stratospheric. A bunch of that is on the o-line, naturally, but Warner's played behind some putrid o-lines and not been sacked as much.

I think Lomax is one of the most unjustly overlooked players in NFL history. (Witness my avatar choice.) Had he played for a better team and/or not had arthritis, he'd be remembered as a damn fine QB.
 
Top