Warriors + Cousins = the NBA HAS JUMPED THE SHARK

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,312
Reaction score
11,387
Lol.. now you are resorting to name calling. Most people just give up and stop when they have been embarassed this bad. You should have saved face and put me on ignore. What triggered our entire discussion is you disagreeing with me for pointing out that Ouchie was wrong for insinuating an auction would be offensive/racist. It had absolutely nothing to do with whether an auction could work (connotations aside).



Bahahaha.. nice try with that stretch
What triggered the entire conversation was the obvious implied racism in replacing free agency with an auction.

Stretch? My retort to your straw man nonsense was apparently so sound that you couldn't even come up with an inane deflection.
 

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
Isn't pro sports in a different category than people with everyday jobs? Players do start with contracts and, at the end, can choose to sign with whichever team they wish.

The contracts start, of course, with drafts, which were designed to maintain parity, which makes it different from any other work category.

Actors sign contracts with studios. Recording artists sign contracts with CD labels. And even corporate executives sign contracts. They cannot just give two weeks notice and move on.

Although I have no use for any kind of group prejudice, isn't this conversation taking place only because most NBA players are African American? But to equate it to slavery is an invalid comparison.

And isn't it the place of labor unions to handle this matter?
It’s a stretch but it’s not surprising because these days many people are determined to make anything and everything about race and ethnicities.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
What triggered the entire conversation was the obvious implied racism in replacing free agency with an auction.

Stretch? My retort to your straw man nonsense was apparently so sound that you couldn't even come up with an inane deflection.
I made the initial suggestion and I intended ABSOLUTELY NO SUCH IMPLICATION. Good grief, quit assuming what other people are thinking. Its insulting.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,312
Reaction score
11,387
I made the initial suggestion and I intended ABSOLUTELY NO SUCH IMPLICATION. Good grief, quit assuming what other people are thinking. Its insulting.
I don't think it's at all what you were thinking, but if replacing free agency with an auction were actually proposed, IMO, the reaction would be visceral in a way you had no intention of.
 
OP
OP
Ouchie-Z-Clown

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,593
Reaction score
58,006
Location
SoCal
I don't think it's at all what you were thinking, but if replacing free agency with an auction were actually proposed, IMO, the reaction would be visceral in a way you had no intention of.
Exactly. My comment wasn’t based on intent but rather the likely reception from a predominantly African American league.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,603
What a meaningless conversation. :D

It's not like the players union would ever even consider buying off on the idea anyways.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
I have no problem with someone disputing the idea based upon its own merits. It was just an idea after all and maybe a bad one. But it is not legit to discount it based upon the connotations of a particular word.
 
OP
OP
Ouchie-Z-Clown

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,593
Reaction score
58,006
Location
SoCal
I have no problem with someone disputing the idea based upon its own merits. It was just an idea after all and maybe a bad one. But it is not legit to discount it based upon the connotations of a particular word.
What society are you living in these days?

Do you not recall the uproar of the comment about the inmates running the prison, or something to that extent?

And I wasn’t so much discounting the idea (although I agree with others that it would never fly with the nbapa) as much as commenting on the use of a highly volatile concept to a specific population sensitive to the word and concept due to historical context.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
I don't think it's at all what you were thinking, but if replacing free agency with an auction were actually proposed, IMO, the reaction would be visceral in a way you had no intention of.
OK. But you said "obvious implication" which indicates intent on my part. If that is not what you meant to communicate, I accept that.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,312
Reaction score
11,387
I have no problem with someone disputing the idea based upon its own merits. It was just an idea after all and maybe a bad one. But it is not legit to discount it based upon the connotations of a particular word.
It's not just the word though, it's the idea that the players would never have the ability to choose their own destiny or even negotiate for themselves.

Baseball used to have the reserve clause, every team was able to reserve exclusive negotiating rights with all players on their roster. Locking players into artificially low wages and short contracts. Among the reasons the players were eventually able to overturn it was it was considered to be in violation of the 14th amendment.

Again, I don't think you had any ill intent. But I suspect a labor system such a labor system wouldn't just be vehemently opposed but likely illegal.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,603
It's not just the word though, it's the idea that the players would never have the ability to choose their own destiny or even negotiate for themselves.

Baseball used to have the reserve clause, every team was able to reserve exclusive negotiating rights with all players on their roster. Locking players into artificially low wages and short contracts. Among the reasons the players were eventually able to overturn it was it was considered to be in violation of the 14th amendment.

Again, I don't think you had any ill intent. But I suspect a labor system such a labor system wouldn't just be vehemently opposed but likely illegal.
I don't know if it would be illegal (assuming that both the owners and the players union signed off on it) because it would likely garner fair wages. Otherwise it could be argued that it should be illegal for the draft to exist because it isn't the player's choice to play where he wants to play.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,312
Reaction score
11,387
I don't know if it would be illegal (assuming that both the owners and the players union signed off on it) because it would likely garner fair wages. Otherwise it could be argued that it should be illegal for the draft to exist because it isn't the player's choice to play where he wants to play.
Well, the players would never agree, so it's moot.

I absolutely think it would lead to lower wages though. Instead of teams negotiating with an agent in the blind they'll know exactly what others are bidding.

The 1994 baseball strike ended because the owners were found to be negotiating in bad faith, which is how I suspect an effort to enact this in basketball would end.
 
Last edited:

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
It's not just the word though, it's the idea that the players would never have the ability to choose their own destiny or even negotiate for themselves.

Baseball used to have the reserve clause, every team was able to reserve exclusive negotiating rights with all players on their roster. Locking players into artificially low wages and short contracts. Among the reasons the players were eventually able to overturn it was it was considered to be in violation of the 14th amendment.

Again, I don't think you had any ill intent. But I suspect a labor system such a labor system wouldn't just be vehemently opposed but likely illegal.
That is disputing on the merits, not on the word. I get that.
 

Matt L

formerly known as mattyboy
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
4,380
Reaction score
589
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
I agree with most of this although the Bledsoe and Bender comment misses the mark. Bender hasn't rolled out there with Bledsoe very much at all. Dragan has only been in the NBA for 2 seasons and he was out with injury for much of his first year. And Bledsoe was traded 3 games into Bender's second year. But, yeah, it seems like forever that we've been rolling out with less than exciting basketball.

I confused Dragan Bender with Goran Dragic. I am a little optimistic for Bender and not a fan of Dragic at all.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
I confused Dragan Bender with Goran Dragic. I am a little optimistic for Bender and not a fan of Dragic at all.

Aah, I see. Well, then this team ought to give you some hope.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,681
Posts
5,410,696
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top