Watch Cunningham from Vandy

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Without being more specific, I have good vibes about Cunningham as a run defender. But not at #13; maybe at #45 or #77. I was kind of surprised that the initial reaction on this board was so negative (Later comments seemed to rate him more positively. Guess we'll have to do more research on him).
 

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
Without being more specific, I have good vibes about Cunningham as a run defender. But not at #13; maybe at #45 or #77. I was kind of surprised that the initial reaction on this board was so negative (Later comments seemed to rate him more positively. Guess we'll have to do more research on him).

Tackles way too high...all arms. That style is not going to work in the NFL. He will have to get his pad level down.
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
Don't think so, not in the first round. They may kick the tires on the Northwestern ILB, Anthony
Walker Jr., who would be a good fit here, imo.
I am actually hoping ARZ can land him in Round 4. His main problem last year was he put on too much muscle which caused him to look slower and sluggish, he should be playing around 230. But overall I like his ability and potential to become a 3 down LB.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,524
Reaction score
16,774
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Warning: Don't fall in love with a single draft prospect. You're likely to be disappointed. There's roughly a 1 in 16 chance he'll be there when we pick as well as a decent chance our scouts will set their sites on some other dude.

Judging by comments here, Foster sounds like "the man" but if he's that good, he could vault into the Top 5 - 10.

Better have a Plan B, C, D etc.

Of late with Keim, I have had no idea who we are drafting and refuse to fall in love with any one guy and slowly removing my admiration for Kizer and will just become a draft ***** with no emotional ties but if we draft a guard in the first round I will go off lol
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,859
Reaction score
17,373
Location
Modesto, California
I have been on the ZC train for a few months now.... would love to get him with our 2nd but he likely comes off the board between 20-25....the kid can ball.....and didn't have the benefit of SEC coaching
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
BTW - here is one of his videos - I only watched the first quarter to experience a few missed tackles - ugh. I don't even want to draft this guy:

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

Cunningham stinks but Alvin Kamara is a beast, dang he would make a helluva 1-2 with David
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Of late with Keim, I have had no idea who we are drafting and refuse to fall in love with any one guy and slowly removing my admiration for Kizer and will just become a draft ***** with no emotional ties but if we draft a guard in the first round I will go off lol
If you bend the definition of BPA to = Available Athlete Who Can Best Help Us Win (AAWCBHW?) - it builds "position-need" back into the equation.

The right QB would easily rank very high on this list, but the wrong QB or even a meh QB wouldn't even be considered (because he couldn't help us win).

To set up a hypothetical example: Suppose we're weak at CB. A so-so corner might not help us win all that much, so why waste a high pick him?

Visualize our current roster and try to imagine how much or how little the addition of each prospect would best help us improve our W&L and that player should be our guy.

I could see Howard, Davis, M Williams, Hooker, Adams, Peppers, Foster, Reddick or, (under the right circumstances), Ramczyk, Bolles or Feeney or one of the elite edge rushers being that guy. It will all depend on how BA&SK view each prospect within the context of how they view our roster within the even bigger context of what we need to beat specific opponents. (I don't think they're especially forthcoming sharing that sort of information with us).

Bottom Line - I understand your concern about drafting another OG at #13, but is the problem that we drafted a guard or that we drafted the wrong guard? (The Steelers have had pretty good results drafting DeCastro (sp?) and Pouncey, no?)
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
If you draft another G that high again he'd better be the next Jonn Hannah, not happening. Starting in the 2nd Rd. if you can find a sure starter then sure it's justifiable.

QBOF, CB, S, ILB, WR/TE. That's a lot of pretty premium positions the team needs help in.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
If you draft another G that high again he'd better be the next Jonn Hannah, not happening. Starting in the 2nd Rd. if you can find a sure starter then sure it's justifiable.

QBOF, CB, S, ILB, WR/TE. That's a lot of pretty premium positions the team needs help in.
We also need a RG.

But that's not the point - We need a good player whatever position we pick.
 
Top