We can't draft AP on Saturday.

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
It has been proven that dual back threats have had much sucess recently.

Except for the Cardinals whose last effort with dual backs ended with them dead last in rushing yards, rushing yards per attempt, and rushing TDs.

Of course you could argue that Shipp and Arrington aren't exactly "threats".
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,603
Location
Generational
Except for the Cardinals whose last effort with dual backs ended with them dead last in rushing yards, rushing yards per attempt, and rushing TDs.

Of course you could argue that Shipp and Arrington aren't exactly "threats".
Different types of threats. Threats to our sanity.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
first off, it is AD as in "All Day" not AP. he is a football god and plays through anything, never complains, and only wants to win. It has been proven that dual back threats have had much sucess recently.

Plus, i dont really want to draft a guy like Thomas who cares so little about the draft that he is going fishing instead. I cant even wrap my head around that, shows his priorities.

First: Given that his name is Adrian Peterson... AP is appropriate and understood, at least, on this board. Thomas' priority is to spend a day fishing with his Dad, and let the draft proceed in its own inexorable way. I can't judge your priorities in life, but I certainly appreciate his. Further, he's being followed around by an NFL network TV crew.
 
Last edited:

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
The guy is like 28-29!
In RB years, that's pretty old.

I like Edge, and think he has two years left in the tank. But, AP is a special talent. If he's there I think we have to take him.

And, don't give me this "but no one can run behind this line. it needs to be fixed!" I agree, but the improving the line isn't out of the question once Peterson is drafted.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Plus, i dont really want to draft a guy like Thomas who cares so little about the draft that he is going fishing instead. I cant even wrap my head around that, shows his priorities.
For me, this isn't a knock on him--it's a plus.

Yes, it does show his priorities. Family is number one in his book. Nothing wrong with that. It's as it should be.

Card take Thomas? Great. Cards take AD? Great. It's when/if those guys aren't available--or worse, are passed on -- that's when I start getting worried.
 
Last edited:

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,603
Location
Generational
For me, this isn't a knock on him--it's a plus.

Yes, it does show his priorities. Family is number one in his book. Nothing wrong with that. It's as it should be.

Card take Thomas? Great. Cards take AD? Great. It's when/if those guys aren't available--or worse, are passed-- on that I start getting worried.
Fishing on draft day definitely sounds like something a Hog (Grimm) would have done back in the day. No problem with it at all.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Comparing what we have invested in Francisco to what we pay Edge doesn't make your point. Edge is one of the highest paid backs in the league. In my opinion it does matter where you have your money invested by position. Unless the Cards just don't believe Edge is the answer. It will be tough to move him though.

Well, that wasn't my point. However, we are paying Wilson 4.1m this year, 4.0m to Holt and 635k to Francisco, and Edge will cost 7.0m, Shipp 2.2m and JJ 960k. The RB's are about 1.5m more expensive. Given this relatively small difference in a 109m cap, I'm not uncomfortable with adding the cost of a #5 pick to the RB's total, as oppossed to the safeties... particularly for a projected very good running back like AP.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Well, that wasn't my point. However, we are paying Wilson 4.1m this year, 4.0m to Holt and 635k to Francisco, and Edge will cost 7.0m, Shipp 2.2m and JJ 960k. The RB's are about 1.5m more expensive.
But we'd likely be jettisoning Shipp, while I think we'd probably keep all four safeties.

And, I don't think it's that out of line to be paying your RB corps more than your safeties.

Also, IMO, you shouldn't pass up talent in the draft based on your checkbook.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,274
Reaction score
5,432
Location
Nashville TN.
But we'd likely be jettisoning Shipp, while I think we'd probably keep all four safeties.

And, I don't think it's that out of line to be paying your RB corps more than your safeties.

Also, IMO, you shouldn't pass up talent in the draft based on your checkbook.

You should if they don't have a line to run behind. The OL talent in the draft is good enough it makes sense for us to go that direction.
 

vinnymac

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Posts
3,022
Reaction score
0
Just like Bobby Bethard said on Nfl total access last night " If the BPA is also a need, you take that player. Other than that you take the BPA" If Thomas and Peterson are on the board then the cardinals should take Thomas. If it were up to me, than i would take Adam Carriker, the best DE for the cardinals in this upcoming draft.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
The OL talent in the draft is good enough it makes sense for us to go that direction.
Not compared to AD it isn't. It's just not.

I like Thomas, and I'll understand if they go with him over AD (though I suspect at least one of the two will be gone)...heck, I'll even be pleased with the selection. But AD is THAT much better than the OL at the top of the draft that even with Edge on the roster you have to consider him.

JMHO (which happens to be right :))
 

mjb21aztd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Posts
16,107
Reaction score
8,367
I guess i've changed my mind on this if Thomas is off the board and Peterson is avliable at number 5 then I say take him our oline did ok late in the season and James and Peterson would be a dangerous rb duo. But I say only take Peterson if Thomas is off the board because I still think we need to address the oline first.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,109
Reaction score
59,085
Location
SoCal
i think adrian peterson is the best player in this draft, including calvin johnson. if we walked away from back-to-back drafts with the players that i thought were the best QB prospect in years and the best RB prospect in years i'd be downright giddy. then slap our pro bowl wrs on top of 'em and i just might believe the cards had a chance to be mediocre in the near future. from there i'd just throw every other dollar and draft pick at oline and DEs.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,925
My biggest fear is I think Graves believes the way to bulid a winner is by trading down and getting more picks. Ala, passing on Suggs to get McDougle later.

The problem is that you can't predict what other teams will do below you so it's much riskier than sitting tight. Which is why we got stuck with BJ and Pace.

If Peterson or Thomas are there and we pass on either of them to trade down I will most likely be banned for the string of $*@%! posts I'll be mashing out afterwards.

Anyway, I've said a few times why Peterson would be the smart choice if Thomas is taken, so I'll leave it at that.


Won't comment about the Suggs trade (for about the 100th time)

But DCR says "Nice sig."
 

Goodyear Card

Link Guy
Joined
Mar 4, 2006
Posts
2,252
Reaction score
1,941
All of our new coaches have wanted to run the ball. Unfortunately, running the ball means we always third and long. I don't care who is the running back or if we have one two or three RBs. then we fall behind by a couple of TDs and we have to throw the ball to catch up. No blocking = No success. AP will not make us successful. An OT has a chance of making us successful.
 

Evil Ash

Henchman Supreme
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Posts
9,757
Reaction score
1,986
Location
On a flying cocoon
All of our new coaches have wanted to run the ball. Unfortunately, running the ball means we always third and long. I don't care who is the running back or if we have one two or three RBs. then we fall behind by a couple of TDs and we have to throw the ball to catch up. No blocking = No success. AP will not make us successful. An OT has a chance of making us successful.


Am I the only person that realizes that there is more then 1 round in the draft?

Ugoh is a OT that fits in the Grimm mold and should be available in round 2
 

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
13,966
Reaction score
4,156
Location
annapolis, md
Johnson wasn't chosen with the fifth pick however and Holmes wasn't taking up the cap space % that Edge was. My whole point is that if the player we draft is successful, we will have less of a positive return with Peterson than with our other main choices. By giving more carries to Peterson and taking away throws to Boldin and Fitz as well as decreasing the financial returns from the investment in Edge, we would be doing the offense a injustice. Clearly a non-bust Thomas or Brown at left tackle will do more for our overall team plan then having the best second back in the league.

In today's game, you can't be good at every position and you sure as heck can't overpay at one and expect to have continued success unless it is at QB.
While I appreciate your opinion, I have to disagree. One thing that I have to stress to you is that you MUST be able to run the ball effectively if you wnt to be successfull in this league. If anything, I think that Peterson's presence will help James. He would still be fresh in the fourth.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,508
Reaction score
2,344
Location
ASFN
3. Since our base set will no longer be 3 wide sets BJ and Fitz will get more balls thrown their way or at the least similar amounts after handing the ball off more times. If we run the ball over 500 times Boldin and Fitz will get plenty of balls thrown their way and may have fewer catches but will have more TD's with more of a running threat.
Not to mention alot more wins.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Am I the only person that realizes that there is more then 1 round in the draft?
No, but people don't want to hear that.

On a related note, weren't you shouting from the rooftops last year that we couldn't and wouldn't take a QB because our line was so bad and anyone playing behind it would be horrible? ;)
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
64,261
Reaction score
30,490
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
PETERSON SAYS HE WON'T MISS TIME

Adam Schefter of NFL Network reports that running back Adrian Peterson says that he won't miss any time due to a collarbone that he re-injured during the Fiesta Bowl.

Per Schefter, Peterson says that he'll be able to fully participate in all offseason activities.

With that said, Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain Dealer reports that Peterson's agent, Ben Dogra, concedes that Peterson might need surgery, which would knock him out of all offseason workouts.

Dogra says that the team that drafts Peterson will have to decide whether a plate should be surgically inserted into the site of the injury.

"It's not a foregone that he'll need the surgery," said Dogra. "It's only if their doctor thinks he requires it. That's why it hasn't happened yet. If they do plate it, doctors have assured us that he'll have only 4-6 weeks of down time, meaning that if he has it in May, he'll be back in time for camp.

"I have not heard from the Browns as to what they would do," Dogra said. "But one way or the other, he'll be ready for the season."

At least one team with whom we spoke (but who won't be drafting Peterson) thinks that surgery is not necessary. The key question is whether the Browns think the plate is needed and, if so, whether that's enough to get them to look elsewhere with the No. 3 overall pick.

If the Browns pass, the question then becomes whether another interested team -- such as the Cardinals at No. 5 or the Vikings at No. 7 -- answer both of those same questions in the affirmative. At some point, a team will decide either that he doesn't need surgery, or that they don't care about the effect of the surgery on his preparations for the 2007 season.

We think that this will happen at No. 12, at the very latest.


http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
64,261
Reaction score
30,490
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
Peterson's agent confirms injury report

Posted by Mary Kay Cabot April 26, 2007 11:55AM
Categories: Breaking News, Browns

The agent for Oklahoma running back Adrian Peterson confirmed a report on SI.com Thursday that Peterson did re-injure his broken collarbone during the Fiesta Bowl -- but that even if he does require surgery, he'll be ready for training camp in July.

"All 32 teams have known about this since the Combine (in late February)," said agent Ben Dogra. "The significant thing is that Adrian went back for a re-check on March 30 and 31st and doctors said he was healing and doing remarkably well."

Dogra said it will be up to the team that drafts Peterson to determine whether or not they to do "plate" the injury, or have a metal plate inserted in the collarbone to stabilize it. Peterson is one of five players the Browns are considering at No. 3.

"It's not a foregone that he'll need the surgery," said Dogra. "It's only if their doctor thinks he requires it. That's why it hasn't happened yet. If they do plate it, doctors have assured us that he'll have only 4-6 weeks of down time, meaning that if he has it in May, he'll be back in time for camp."

Dogra said some teams have told him that they would probably let it heal on its own since it's doing so well. "I have not heard from the Browns as to what they would do," said Dogra. "But one way or the other, he'll be ready for the season."

An e-mail message sent to Browns general manager Phil Savage was not immediately returned.

Dogra said he does not expect the collarbone to affect Peterson's draft status. "I'm still confident he'll be among the top picks," said Dogra. "It's an upper-body injury, which is not as serious for a running back as a leg injury."

Peterson first broke the collarbone diving into the end zone in week 6 against Iowa State. He missed the rest of the regular season and returned for the Fiesta Bowl.

-- Mary Kay Cabot

http://blog.cleveland.com/sports/200...rms_injur.html
You must be registered for see images
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
556,146
Posts
5,433,870
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top