GatorAZ
feed hopkins
You said they're 4-2 without Palmer. That's incorrect. They're 3-2.
Which would still be our record if Fitz would've played.
You said they're 4-2 without Palmer. That's incorrect. They're 3-2.
What did I say that was incorrect. In order for this conversation to move forward, you need to point out the errors in what I said but frankly, there aren't any. All I do is provide facts which is all I've done here so please list where I'm in error and we'll continue.
I guess I look at more than records...this team is clearly more limited without Palmer than it is without Fitz.
You said they're 4-2 without Palmer. That's incorrect. They're 3-2.
Which would still be our record if Fitz would've played.
However, as I pointed out, the record proves otherwise. I mean, last I looked wins are what counts. I'm not disagreeing with you that Palmer is a better option than Stanton but we've still been able to win without Palmer but in Fitz's first game out, we lost and were missing him badly.
Vince Young had a winning NFL record...records prove very little. If you can't see that, there isn't much in regards to football we can talk about. A WR is a part of an offense while a QB is a key to the offense.