What if the Raiders...

OP
OP
Jetstream Green

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Yes. If you can add a 1st round to move from 1 to 4...you do it. There is not a first round pick difference between the top 4 players in this draft.

That's what I am thinking, we do not need all three to make this advantageous and one would think makes it even more doable for the Raiders
 
OP
OP
Jetstream Green

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
I just don't think we need all three to see the bonus. The Raiders might come across as winners to some but we still do better than just having the one, but then again I believe that the talent drop off to four for a difference maker is not so big and we can then get a stud WR or even a OL guy in the first while still having our first second round pick to start off day two
 

SissyBoyFloyd

Pawnee, Skidi Clan
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Posts
5,077
Reaction score
2,384
Location
Mesa, AZ
great for us, but is Gruden that dumb. He is rebuilding his team also and needs those picks himself. Plus, why trade when the guy you want may be there at 4 anyway.

Think this through guys: If Cards want Murray they aren't trading. Thus, if they don't want him, there is no need to trade. There has been, not even a mention, of any other top team in the draft needing or coveting Murray. Even Lock is now being mentioned as FQOB if Cards pass on Murray. Heck, he might fall to Raiders at 24. You just never know. And on top off all that, Carr is no bum. Like Rosen, Allen, or even Eli, they all need to be surrounded by talented players. As they now stand, Raiders can get Carr any and all the talent he needs in this draft besides shoring up their D with their top pick.
 

ARZCardinals

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Posts
4,151
Reaction score
699
Location
Behind you
If Gruden and Mayock are that high on a player Cardinals should be thinking it over very carefully. They've been VERY smart picking up players this offseason
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
I probably wouldn't. Too many possibilities to get outmaneuvered and end up with egg on our faces trying to get greedy, all while handing the 49ers Bosa, and watching Q Williams get traded up for at 3 or whatever.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,917
Reaction score
26,027
Location
Orlando, FL
I’d be stunned if Oakland gave up this much, but I’ve been stunned by Gruden’s 2 cuts already.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,712
Reaction score
10,601
No.

It would take at least 2 1sts this year, and next years 1st for me to trade off of Murray
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,852
If Gruden and Mayock are that high on a player Cardinals should be thinking it over very carefully. They've been VERY smart picking up players this offseason

... and also got rid of a top 5 player in the league in Khalil Mack.
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,166
Reaction score
31,697
Location
Scottsdale, Az
DraftTek Mock has the Raiders and Cards trading #1 for 2 Raider RD 1 picks and a 2nd Rd pick and both teams swapping some picks later in the draft.
Oakland gets #1 and #139

Cards get #4 and #24 and #35

Perfect
 

ARZCardinals

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Posts
4,151
Reaction score
699
Location
Behind you
... and also got rid of a top 5 player in the league in Khalil Mack.
They had NO choice in that matter. The Raiders have been in cap hell and there was a zero chance of resigning him this offseason.
Not sure if you knew that
Instead of having Mack for one year and letting him go...they got GREAT value in return
 

Ronin

Wut?
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
144,579
Reaction score
66,161
Location
Crowley, TX
plus the raiders are broke.

Yes I would do the deal.
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,250
Reaction score
12,215
Location
York, PA
To lose out on Murray, it would take multiple 1st round picks & at least 1 of their SB trophies. Because otherwise, we’d never see one in our building.
 

AZCrazy

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 18, 2014
Posts
3,984
Reaction score
2,562
If Cards want Murray they aren't trading. Thus, if they don't want him, there is no need to trade.

Pure logic. Good thoughts. The Raiders would really have to love Murray a lot, and firmly believe the Cardinals want him, to make any kind of move.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,668
Location
CA
DraftTek Mock has the Raiders and Cards trading #1 for 2 Raider RD 1 picks and a 2nd Rd pick and both teams swapping some picks later in the draft.
Oakland gets #1 and #139

Cards get #4 and #24 and #35
This would be sweet!
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,250
Reaction score
12,215
Location
York, PA
DraftTek Mock has the Raiders and Cards trading #1 for 2 Raider RD 1 picks and a 2nd Rd pick and both teams swapping some picks later in the draft.
Oakland gets #1 and #139

Cards get #4 and #24 and #35

Are the Raiders making that trade to snag Bosa??
 

swagron

All Star
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Posts
724
Reaction score
444
Location
PhoAz
Not a chance this happening. Who would the Raiders move up for? They don’t want the midget.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,331
IF the Cards don't draft Murray #1 overall then how far does he fall in the draft? Maybe the Raiders draft him at 4 but I doubt it.

Does BA want him in Tampa, don't think he is a BA QB type.

Doubt the Giants take him, not the prototypical QB they covet.

Jags just signed Foles.

Lions and Bills have their franchise QB

Broncos just traded for Flacco and I don't think Murray Elways type.

Bengals, maybe.

Packers are a hard no.

Dolphins are a maybe.

So if Murray could fall to the 11th pick or so then why are we taking him #1 overall???

If KKSK really want Murray then they need to get max value for the #1 pick which means trading back at least once and taking Murray where his value warrants it. Especially when we already have a franchise QB in the fold.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,669
Posts
5,410,664
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top