What Is Our Best Unit? (Minus QB)

What is out best unit?

  • OL

    Votes: 6 15.4%
  • TE

    Votes: 17 43.6%
  • WR

    Votes: 4 10.3%
  • RB

    Votes: 4 10.3%
  • DL

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • EDGE

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • ILB

    Votes: 2 5.1%
  • CB

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • S

    Votes: 6 15.4%
  • ST

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    39

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
17,524
Reaction score
14,914
Location
Modesto, California
TE group is amazing. RB group is awesome.

Neither of those groups amount to spit if the Oline does not hold up.

when are you guys gonna wise up and give the Big Men the credit they deserve??
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
5,966
Reaction score
1,465
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
Voted TE. If we exclude QB, then it can only be TE or S IMO. Only positions where we have a proven elite player and the depth is very good as well.

I do, however, think the play at OL is the most important factor for the team. They set the tone for the entire offense

We have good depth at RB, but no matter how good a fit Connor is to this system, he's not a top 5 RB.

The CB room has potential to become special over time.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
27,465
Reaction score
37,638
Location
Colorado
You all are a bit crazy on your TE love. It is a nice group but low production outside of McBride. Same with RB.
 

CardNots

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
4,499
Reaction score
4,525
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
This is an interesting one.
Mainly we have fixed the left guard position.

False starts are low to non existent or doesn’t seem to impact the game.

I don’t see KM being crashed up the middle of the line immediately as before.

KM seems to actually have what resembles a pocket more times than not.

Running lanes are available.

Less pass attempts seem to be tipped or batted down.

3 newly manned positions which should have spelled it will take time but I haven’t seen a drop off in performance.

Last not to be ignored, I’m a bit bias when it comes to the big guys:)
 
Last edited:

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
21,764
Reaction score
38,992
Location
UK
I voted OL.

I like the TE room, but both Higgins and Reiman have done very little at the NFL level, it's all potential.

The OL is legit underappreciated. We have one of the most difficult run schemes in the league and a mobile QB that is a nightmare for OL to block for.

It's not a top 10 unit, but it's getting there. It's certainly much better than given credit for.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
12,729
Reaction score
22,289
You all are a bit crazy on your TE love. It is a nice group but low production outside of McBride. Same with RB.
I mean, it really might be TE just off of McBride’s ability alone. I loved the Budda/Jalen duo for a while, but I believe McBride is a better player than both of them combined at this stage. Budda is slowing down, Jalen remains consistently solid, but McBride is only going up.
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,739
Reaction score
4,373
Location
Iowa
TE but RB is equally as good when you are 4 deep and have a solid veteran like Michael Carter on the practice squad.
 

CardNots

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
4,499
Reaction score
4,525
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
I mean, it really might be TE just off of McBride’s ability alone. I loved the Budda/Jalen duo for a while, but I believe McBride is a better player than both of them combined at this stage. Budda is slowing down, Jalen remains consistently solid, but McBride is only going up.
Graded out as one of the worst on the team along with White so are you sure and why so?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
547,454
Posts
5,351,319
Members
6,304
Latest member
Dbacks05
Top