Mitch
Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
What has Whiz's role been in the negotiations?
Why would Q be upset with Whiz's role?
Could Whiz have said one or more of the following???:
A. Don't re-sign him.
B. Don't offer him millions in guaranteed $$$...he's a health risk.
C. Don't offer him a deal anywhere close to what Fitz got.
D. Make him play out his contract and then resume negotiations.
E. Don't rework his contract until after this season.
The way Q has termed his relationship with Whiz and the orginization as "irreparable"...it would seem obvious that Q has perceived Whiz as being a deterrent in negotiations, not a catalyst.
Until we know the truth about Whiz's role...we cannot fully understand Q's position, can we?
If Q's true perception is that Whiz is partially responsible for not receiving a new contract, then it would be understandable why Q is so indignant.
However, if Q is using Whiz as a scapegoat in order to try to expedite the trade he's been wanting since the Fitz deal was finalized, then, shame on Q.
None of the beat reporters, Somers or Urban in particular, have clarified what Whiz's supposed role in Q's contract negotiations was...and until we know what really happened (if anything), we cannot fully understand the gist of this situation.
The thing is: can any of you imagine Whiz wanting to stand in the way of Q's getting a new contract?
If anything, one would think that Whiz would want to keep Q happy and in the fold...not the other way around.
Can anyone really imagine Whiz as being a deterrent here?
Does Whiz know something about Q that would have caused him to be a deterrent in contract negotiations?
Answers, anyone?
Why would Q be upset with Whiz's role?
Could Whiz have said one or more of the following???:
A. Don't re-sign him.
B. Don't offer him millions in guaranteed $$$...he's a health risk.
C. Don't offer him a deal anywhere close to what Fitz got.
D. Make him play out his contract and then resume negotiations.
E. Don't rework his contract until after this season.
The way Q has termed his relationship with Whiz and the orginization as "irreparable"...it would seem obvious that Q has perceived Whiz as being a deterrent in negotiations, not a catalyst.
Until we know the truth about Whiz's role...we cannot fully understand Q's position, can we?
If Q's true perception is that Whiz is partially responsible for not receiving a new contract, then it would be understandable why Q is so indignant.
However, if Q is using Whiz as a scapegoat in order to try to expedite the trade he's been wanting since the Fitz deal was finalized, then, shame on Q.
None of the beat reporters, Somers or Urban in particular, have clarified what Whiz's supposed role in Q's contract negotiations was...and until we know what really happened (if anything), we cannot fully understand the gist of this situation.
The thing is: can any of you imagine Whiz wanting to stand in the way of Q's getting a new contract?
If anything, one would think that Whiz would want to keep Q happy and in the fold...not the other way around.
Can anyone really imagine Whiz as being a deterrent here?
Does Whiz know something about Q that would have caused him to be a deterrent in contract negotiations?
Answers, anyone?