What will it take to get to the 4th pick

Vacard

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Posts
4,538
Reaction score
4,105
Location
VA
Look, standing pat isn’t going to do it this year. Every team knows we are desperate for a qb. If Lamar Is still on the board at 14, some team will trade up to get him. So what would it take to trade up to the 4? If Mayfield goes number one then that could leave either Rosen or Darnold left. I prefer Rosen personally. How many picks will it take?
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Look, standing pat isn’t going to do it this year. Every team knows we are desperate for a qb. If Lamar Is still on the board at 14, some team will trade up to get him. So what would it take to trade up to the 4? If Mayfield goes number one then that could leave either Rosen or Darnold left. I prefer Rosen personally. How many picks will it take?
Honestly, probably at least three first rounders, if not more than that, like this or next year's 2nd.

Assuming Cousins goes to the Vikings, it leaves both the Broncos and Jets in situations nearly as desperate as ours. We'll need to make the trade back so sweet for Cleveland (or the Colts) that moving back a few picks to 5 or 6 just isn't worth it to pick up another 2nd or third. And that's assuming Miami isn't offering a similar kind of package.

If the Browns take Barkley #1 overall, there probably isn't even a way to move up into the 4 spot.
 
OP
OP
Vacard

Vacard

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Posts
4,538
Reaction score
4,105
Location
VA
Honestly, probably at least three first rounders, if not more than that, like this or next year's 2nd.

Assuming Cousins goes to the Vikings, it leaves both the Broncos and Jets in situations nearly as desperate as ours. We'll need to make the trade back so sweet for Cleveland (or the Colts) that moving back a few picks to 5 or 6 just isn't worth it to pick up another 2nd or third. And that's assuming Miami isn't offering a similar kind of package.

If the Browns take Barkley #1 overall, there probably isn't even a way to move up into the 4 spot.
Damn and both those teams, Broncos and Jets, have better first round picks then we do. I think it would take next years number one and two plus this years first, third, and a stud to get it done.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,181
Reaction score
16,270
Location
Modesto, California
Look, standing pat isn’t going to do it this year. Every team knows we are desperate for a qb. If Lamar Is still on the board at 14, some team will trade up to get him. So what would it take to trade up to the 4? If Mayfield goes number one then that could leave either Rosen or Darnold left. I prefer Rosen personally. How many picks will it take?

I dont think 4 is available. If we want to trade up like that we have to target 1, 2, or 3

why..

cleveland has already said they would entertain trades for...#1,..they didnt say for 4, for #1.

Trading for 4 only allows the Giants and the Colts to get more for 2 and 3...and it also leaves two spots in front of us for teams to trade into...everyone knows we need a QB...so if we were to go get 4.... Denver and the Jets would both be looking to get 2 and 3


if we get to 2 and the Browns select Barkley we have our pick of the QB's...ideal.... at 3 there is still the possibility of two QB's being off the board... not likely but possible

the tough spot is, once the Browns select Barkley at 1...the price for pick 2 goes way up...so if Keim were interested in trading up he might consider making the deal before the draft... but with the Giants also interested in Barkley they may not trade until they know clevelands pick.....
so many unknowns this time of year... what is known...is that the Browns will in fact trade the #1 overall pick.... so they should just go for that
 

GimmedaBall

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 2, 2013
Posts
1,626
Reaction score
1,110
Too high a cost for too little return.

Is there a QB in this draft that is worth that much in draft capital? If there was a guy who is far and away a top QB candidate the trade would still be a gamble.

We got average to slightly above average QBs coming out and we are going to give away the next several #1 picks?

Even the 'consensus' #1 Darnold has flaws in his delivery that will not be easy to correct---see Tebow's struggle to correct his flaw. At the pro-level, Darnold is going to be a turnover waiting to happen.

Keep the picks. Sign a young vet---for $30 mil you can sign two. Keep building the roster and become a dominant D, solid run game, competent QB.

If that fails and the team tanks, we will get our #1 pick in the draft the old fashioned way---we will have earned it.
 
OP
OP
Vacard

Vacard

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Posts
4,538
Reaction score
4,105
Location
VA
Too high a cost for too little return.

Is there a QB in this draft that is worth that much in draft capital? If there was a guy who is far and away a top QB candidate the trade would still be a gamble.

We got average to slightly above average QBs coming out and we are going to give away the next several #1 picks?

Even the 'consensus' #1 Darnold has flaws in his delivery that will not be easy to correct---see Tebow's struggle to correct his flaw. At the pro-level, Darnold is going to be a turnover waiting to happen.

Keep the picks. Sign a young vet---for $30 mil you can sign two. Keep building the roster and become a dominant D, solid run game, competent QB.

If that fails and the team tanks, we will get our #1 pick in the draft the old fashioned way---we will have earned it.
I think both Rosen and Mayfield are worth it. I see them as being Carson Palmer and Drew Brees respectively
 

gmabel830

It's football season!!
Joined
May 8, 2011
Posts
12,995
Reaction score
8,090
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
I was thinking about this last night. Browns are stocked with picks this year, but what if they use #4 to stock up next year.

Say they take a QB first and then Barkley and Chubb go 2 and 3. At 4, Browns are likely left with someone like Fitzpatrick, but say Jets are desperate to get in front of Denver and give up 6 and next year's 1 to get their guy. Say then at 6 the Cards or someone else come calling and offer their first this year and next year's first and second to go up and get the last of the top 4 QBs. Browns would get their franchise QB at #1 and flip #4 for a lower first rounder plus 2 extra ones and an extra two next year.. would really set them up to keep stockpiling and overhauling the roster.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 

Frank The Fixer

Veteran
Joined
Apr 27, 2017
Posts
221
Reaction score
268
Location
Chandler
Honestly, probably at least three first rounders, if not more than that, like this or next year's 2nd.

Assuming Cousins goes to the Vikings, it leaves both the Broncos and Jets in situations nearly as desperate as ours. We'll need to make the trade back so sweet for Cleveland (or the Colts) that moving back a few picks to 5 or 6 just isn't worth it to pick up another 2nd or third. And that's assuming Miami isn't offering a similar kind of package.

If the Browns take Barkley #1 overall, there probably isn't even a way to move up into the 4 spot.


They won't take Barkley. They'll take a quarterback first and fleece the team that tries to move up.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
They won't take Barkley. They'll take a quarterback first and fleece the team that tries to move up.
I agree with you, but there's an entire other thread on here insisting otherwise, haha. Just continuing the overall chatter.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
15,955
Reaction score
7,769
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
I dont think 4 is available. If we want to trade up like that we have to target 1, 2, or 3

why..

cleveland has already said they would entertain trades for...#1,..they didnt say for 4, for #1.

Trading for 4 only allows the Giants and the Colts to get more for 2 and 3...and it also leaves two spots in front of us for teams to trade into...everyone knows we need a QB...so if we were to go get 4.... Denver and the Jets would both be looking to get 2 and 3


if we get to 2 and the Browns select Barkley we have our pick of the QB's...ideal.... at 3 there is still the possibility of two QB's being off the board... not likely but possible

the tough spot is, once the Browns select Barkley at 1...the price for pick 2 goes way up...so if Keim were interested in trading up he might consider making the deal before the draft... but with the Giants also interested in Barkley they may not trade until they know Cleveland's pick.....
so many unknowns this time of year... what is known...is that the Browns will in fact trade the #1 overall pick.... so they should just go for that

Well the deal would not be consummated until draft day. No way is anybody going to make that trade up with Cleveland until they know for sure who is on the board. So the real thing then is you are negotiating a deal with Cleveland who is negotiating with other teams, so basically the are auctioning off the pick, and that is why I think you're looking a either 3-1s or at least 2-1s and 2-2s.
 

AZCrazy

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 18, 2014
Posts
3,984
Reaction score
2,562
Why would the Browns want to trade down? This is the year they get right. They'll get Barkley and Darnold both if they stand pat.
 
OP
OP
Vacard

Vacard

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Posts
4,538
Reaction score
4,105
Location
VA
You really want to give up a possibly HOF corner for the 3rd or 4th QB off the board, who has never thrown an NFL pass?
Who is on the downside of his career and could be replace if we trade down for whatever picks we have left.
 

SoCal Cardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Posts
6,056
Reaction score
1,296
Why would the Browns want to trade down? This is the year they get right. They'll get Barkley and Darnold both if they stand pat.

The Browns could hold the first 5 picks and the draft, and still botch it horribly.
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,351
Reaction score
16,231
You really want to give up a possibly HOF corner for the 3rd or 4th QB off the board, who has never thrown an NFL pass?
Yes. In a heartbeat yes. Like..... Right now.
 

GimmedaBall

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 2, 2013
Posts
1,626
Reaction score
1,110
Why would the Browns want to trade down? This is the year they get right. They'll get Barkley and Darnold both if they stand pat.

If the Browns sign McCarron as their starter QB they will be able to hold the rest of the league hostage to their demands for either #1 or #4 . . . or both.

Fans need to see how FA plays out before going all in on the draft itself. All it will take to blow the QB hunt out of the water will be for McCarron, Cousins, Keenum, Bradford, Bridgewater, etc to sign on as starters (or even bridge QBs) and the entire dynamics of draft order and teams who need a QB shifts dramatically.

The biggest feeding frenzy will occur if the Browns sign a QB and put their picks on the market. Teams will see that shiny top pick at #1 and even #4 as too precious to pass up---even when its not. Browns could sign McCarron, take RB Barkley (top player in this draft) and put that #4 up for bid---they trade down in this year's first and hoard more picks for next year. They get a QB, a RB, and a top player at his position + picks/other players. That is why the Browns might trade down. Even if McCarron falls flat, they can get to the head of the line for QB next year.

All the trade up talk surrounding the Cards at #15 is way premature. Too many QB moves on the horizon with FA that will flush all these fan speculations down the river.
 

HGC

All Star
Joined
Mar 21, 2017
Posts
953
Reaction score
1,046
Location
Chandler
If the Browns sign McCarron as their starter QB they will be able to hold the rest of the league hostage to their demands for either #1 or #4 . . . or both.

Fans need to see how FA plays out before going all in on the draft itself. All it will take to blow the QB hunt out of the water will be for McCarron, Cousins, Keenum, Bradford, Bridgewater, etc to sign on as starters (or even bridge QBs) and the entire dynamics of draft order and teams who need a QB shifts dramatically.

The biggest feeding frenzy will occur if the Browns sign a QB and put their picks on the market. Teams will see that shiny top pick at #1 and even #4 as too precious to pass up---even when its not. Browns could sign McCarron, take RB Barkley (top player in this draft) and put that #4 up for bid---they trade down in this year's first and hoard more picks for next year. They get a QB, a RB, and a top player at his position + picks/other players. That is why the Browns might trade down. Even if McCarron falls flat, they can get to the head of the line for QB next year.

All the trade up talk surrounding the Cards at #15 is way premature. Too many QB moves on the horizon with FA that will flush all these fan speculations down the river.


I'm pretty sure John Dorsey isn't putting his teams future in the hands of AJ McCarron any longer than Chicago did with Glennon. McCarron hasn't thrown a meaningful pass in 3 years.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,669
Posts
5,410,663
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top