sportznutt
Canadian Card
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2005
- Posts
- 3,334
- Reaction score
- 177
Perhaps not necessarily the best QB, but the best one suited for this team.
Ricky Stanzi, IOWA in the middle rounds. I have a feeling this guy will be special one day.
Tony Robbins 6'7, big guy, great leader, good composure. (little old though)
Cam Newton,...can make all the throws, and has the escapability we desperately NEED in a QB due to the horrendous coaching our offensive line gets.
He's such a project & really can't believe anything you see in him says he's anything close to being an NFL QB. He's not worth the gamble IMO
Ryan Mallett. 1st round. Michigan pedigree. Experience at Arkansas.
Pat Devlin. Second round. Michigan pedigree. Experience at Delaware.
Has Luck been excluded because we don't think he'll be there? Because he's not suited for us?
Perhaps not necessarily the best QB, but the best one suited for this team.
Why?Ricky Stanzi, Pat Devlin or Christian Pointier would be ok for me.
Why?
Luck is the clear cut # 1 choice and would be the best for any team needing a QB. But what I don't understand is why, with Luck gone, do people want lower level talent guys when the oppurtunity to pick, probably the most pure talent at QB in the draft in Mallet, will likely be staring you in the face. Mallet may be a bust but he has a much higher ceiling than these other guys people are mentioning. They have less talent and higher likelyhood of being a on-contributor. It starts with talent.
The ONLY two guys I would draft are Luck & Mallett. Luck has everything, including intelligence to a be a GREAT NFL QB. I honestly think he's the best QB prospect since Peyton Manning came out. Mallett has decent upside, but he's a clearly not as good as Luck. If neither are available, the Cardinals need to bring in a FA or trade for an experienced QB. Someone like Shawn Hill from the Lions or Kyle O from the Broncos. We already have two projects sitting on the bench, why draft more projects??
Why?
Luck is the clear cut # 1 choice and would be the best for any team needing a QB. But what I don't understand is why, with Luck gone, do people want lower level talent guys when the oppurtunity to pick, probably the most pure talent at QB in the draft in Mallet, will likely be staring you in the face. Mallet may be a bust but he has a much higher ceiling than these other guys people are mentioning. They have less talent and higher likelyhood of being a on-contributor. It starts with talent.
Whether you like it or not, the Cards are going to be drafting in the top 5, and he'd be INSANELY overdrafted at that place. Like Akili Smith overdrafted.