- Joined
- May 13, 2002
- Posts
- 11,918
- Reaction score
- 1
Soon?
az jam said:Will start two weeks before training camp in reverse order from the draft (i.e 7th round, 6th round picks signed first). First round pick signed just before camp opens. As an ex-Viking fan, I can't recall any draft holdouts when Denny was their coach.
lrk27 said:I wouldn't get too excited about Fitzgerald being in on time. I think he wants to be in on time, but his negotiation is going to wind up being tricky. The top picks in this years draft will have more problems than usual because of the trade between NY and SD.
Both Eli Manning and Philip Rivers will expect #1 overall money and the brothers Poston said that they are expecting to negotiate Kellen Winslow as a #1 overall pick.
This means that Fitzgerald at #3 is stuck in the middle of other people's problems. As much as he wants to get in on time, there is a lot of pressure on the agents from the players union to sign in order, so that they all get fair market value. If Fitz signed ahead of Rivers, Manning, and Winslow, the union wouldn't be happy. I think he wants to be in Flagstaff on August 1, but the politics of signing picks may make that difficult.
40yearfan said:Irk27, since the NFL has established a rookie pool hasn't the first round draft picks contract amounts been very similar from year to year with only a slight rise in them on a yearly basis? Because there's only so much money to go around for the draft class, the difference in dollars from last year to this year should be almost insignificant. Therefore, if Fitz signed for say 2 or 3% over what last years' third round pick received, he should be right in the ball park.
lrk27 said:Yes, he will probably get a deal almost identical to last year's #3 pick. Again, I don't think working out the details of his contract will be the problem. Fitz knows he went #3 and accepts that, the problem is that three different guys think they deserve the money of a #1 overall, which will delay the signings of the top 6 picks. Unfortunately, depending on how his agent wants to play this, Fitz may not have much control over when he signs. If he's not in on time, it won't be because of a holdout, just that the deal isn't done yet for other reasons.
Tangodnzr said:Edited to add: I don't know who you are Irk, but Skkorp keeps saying you have "inside info". I really would be interested to know, just for curiousity's sake exactly what your "pipeline" is and why you seem you feel your stated scenario is so likely. (I realize that's basically a rhetorical question, as it will never be answered). It sounds like too much bureaucrat-speak to me. Whether it be you, or you are just repeating what you claim to "hear".
vikesfan said:Uh there will be no problem with Fitz. The NFL has established a procedure the procedure is you get what your slot is worth plus a slight raise.
maddogkf said:Why Postons think KW2 is worthy of #1 money is what's wrong with sports today.
Good stuff as always Luke. Thanks for the blurb.
joeshmo said:The Postons never said they think he is worthy of a #1 pick money. All they said was that he is a #1 caliber player. Big difference. Winslow himself denounced that idea as a load of crap in several interviews. It was just the media twisting their words around thats all.
Winslow's negotiations will not have an impact what so ever on Fitz negotiations and shouldnt even be put in the same breath.
The only possible stumbling block wll be Manning/Rivers negotiations.
And even then I doubt it will be a problem, becuase both teams will have both signed in time becuase they are big parts of their offseasons, and holdouts would be huge negative media to them.