Which offseason acquisition would you most want?

[cardsfanmd]

It WAS the wrong move that year. Plain and simple.

You're comment isn't made in a vacuum. You made it here. In a thread where Suggs in hardly mentioned and the draft wasn't mentioned at all.

But, if the ravings about Suggs have indeed quieted down, then your comment still doesn't make any sense because people don't think highly of him but likely still care for their mother.

You are an ignorant pompous d--k and I am so sick of you attempting to make your opinions factual. I for one dont care how many posts you have or who likes you. You degrate people on this board every week and are apparently exempt from punishment. I would rather be banned permanently then have to continue being talked to this way. I can make my comments wherever I please and will continue to do so for as long as I am a member here.

Finally, your last sentence makes zero sense whatsoever. Please go back and read what I wrote again.

 

[Skkorpion]

Faneca is the best of the three, even if his play is slipping a little. His run blocking would help us a lot. He does have age on him so I don't want to overpay.

The "fit" with the Cards is perfect since he already knows the system and plays well in it. Everybody knows I'm not a fan of building through free agency and I like Reggie Wells. But you can never have enough good Oline players and Faneca and Grimm are such a perfect fit, I'd be very happy if we lured the guy here.

Wells is versatile so he's a valuable keep to plug in where and when needed.

 

[Cheesebeef]

You are an ignorant pompous d--k and I am so sick of you attempting to make your opinions factual.

what happened to this board?

 

[Pariah]

You people on this board think higher of Terrell than his own mother.

Let's try this again, friend.

1. You said people think more highly of Suggs than their mothers.
2. I said most people were talking about Hall and Faneca, NOT Suggs
3. You said they changed their mind, finally coming around to your point of view
4. If #3 is true, then they no longer think highly of Suggs

You can make any comment you want, but don't expect to not get called on it when someone disagrees with you.

 

[D-Dogg]

Faneca or Hall.

I want us to draft Cason, so I said Faneca.

 

[D-Dogg]

what happened to this board?

Seriously.

 

[abomb]

I think the mods need to tighten things up to 11.

 

[Russ Smith]

It WAS the wrong move that year. Plain and simple.

You're comment isn't made in a vacuum. You made it here. In a thread where Suggs in hardly mentioned and the draft wasn't mentioned at all.

But, if the ravings about Suggs have indeed quieted down, then your comment still doesn't make any sense because people don't think highly of him but likely still care for their mother.

Is it our own mother or Suggs' mother?

I've never met her so that makes a big difference to me.

 

[Russ Smith]

Seriously.

I think Donald should post more just so I can see that pic of Scarlett more often.

 

[D-Dogg]

I think Donald should post more just so I can see that pic of Scarlett more often.

This is by far the most popular avatar I've ever sported.

 

[abomb]

I think Donald should post more just so I can see that pic of Scarlett more often.

Here here!!!

 

[Russ Smith]

This is by far the most popular avatar I've ever sported.

Yes it has absolutely nothing to do with what you post just that pic.

 

[D-Dogg]

Yes it has absolutely nothing to do with what you post just that pic.

 

[Linderbee]

Let's try this again, friend.

1. You said people think more highly of Suggs than their mothers.

No, he said people think more highly of Suggs than Suggs' mother thinks of Suggs.

You pompous...

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

I think the mods need to tighten things up to 11.

it's one tighter

 

[CardinalChris]

How many years and for how much. The best player on there is Faneca, but probably has a only good 3-4 years left in the tank. Suggs is the biggest need and younger, but disappeared this season. Hall is loud and hasn't done much since his rookie year. Plus "Shut down" corners are overrated because only one exists I can think of (Champ), so these other very good players are call shut down corners when they are not. Hall is not a "shut down" corner.

 

[mjb21aztd]

I say we try to get suggs we need defensive help badly and I like him a lot better then hall, but if we get eaither one of those 3 I won't be disapointed

 

[artp]

How many years and for how much. The best player on there is Faneca, but probably has a only good 3-4 years left in the tank. Suggs is the biggest need and younger, but disappeared this season. Hall is loud and hasn't done much since his rookie year. Plus "Shut down" corners are overrated because only one exists I can think of (Champ), so these other very good players are call shut down corners when they are not. Hall is not a "shut down" corner.

I prefer CB Hall. Best case scenario, Hall can mature into a Pro Bowl CB. I don't think the Pro Bowl is in the future of Faneca or Suggs anymore.
But, I would take any one of them. All are an improvement.

 

[Cbus cardsfan]

Yes it has absolutely nothing to do with what you post just that pic.

Scarlett looks enhanced . Oh, and i say get Faneca. Hall is crap and we can draft a player in round 1 or 2 that can fill the LB void.

 

[Harry]

If I have to take one, it's Faneca, but his age is a valid concern. Suggs has had a down year and has always looked to be like more of a 4-3 defensive end than and OLB. He's much like Simeon Rice and you can with with that guy in the right scheme. Hall is overrated, but would be a definite upgrade.

 

[Crazy Canuck]

Hall is not only a tool but he sucks as well. The most burned for TD's CB in the league.

http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/vb/showpost.php?p=1528062&postcount=12

The kid hasnt done anything in this league but talk smack to other WR's. Him talking smack is the only reason why people think he is good because it isnt his performance against those WR's or his production.

If I had to pick from that list of 3 it would Faneca becuase I think Wells is without question the weakest link on our OL. We could get by with Pace, Berry, Okeafer, draftee at the OLB spots.

As for being able to get them under our cap next offseason, without question we could get all three of them under the cap very easily.

I take it that when you say this... you've factored in the possible cost of extending our own UFA, notably Dansby and Pace (possibly Johnson); retention of a number of our RFA's... and the possibility of re-signing Fitz and Boldin to new contracts... more in keeping with the present market.

 

[overseascardfan]

I take it that when you say this... you've factored in the possible cost of extending our own UFA, notably Dansby and Pace (possibly Johnson); retention of a number of our RFA's... and the possibility of re-signing Fitz and Boldin to new contracts... more in keeping with the present market.

There really aren't any RFA's that stand out on our team. Johnson will not be back as I feel the Cardinals figure they could do without him. Opening up a spot for a speed receiver in either the draft or FA. Dansby & Pace will be re-signed if they don't re-sign one of them that opens the door for Suggs.

My FA signees would be Suggs, Crumpler & Samuel.
My 1st three picks in the draft would be Cason, Slaton & Barton.

 

[joeshmo]

I take it that when you say this... you've factored in the possible cost of extending our own UFA, notably Dansby and Pace (possibly Johnson); retention of a number of our RFA's... and the possibility of re-signing Fitz and Boldin to new contracts... more in keeping with the present market.

As in the lets be dumb and use all of our cap for roster bonuses Cards strategy the answer is no.

As in the lets do something in between lets use roster bonuses and signing bonuses smart strategy, yes.

Extending Fitz would lower our cap considerably since he will count 15 mill next year. That number will be cut in half at a minimum if he is extended.

http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/vb/showpost.php?p=1471518&postcount=94

 

[CtCardinals78]

You are an ignorant pompous d--k and I am so sick of you attempting to make your opinions factual. I for one dont care how many posts you have or who likes you. You degrate people on this board every week and are apparently exempt from punishment. I would rather be banned permanently then have to continue being talked to this way. I can make my comments wherever I please and will continue to do so for as long as I am a member here.

Finally, your last sentence makes zero sense whatsoever. Please go back and read what I wrote again.

Cardfan has been a bad boy again. How long is he banned for this time anyone know? He has some serious anger issues to get so torqued up on a message board.

Cardfan has anger, attitude, and a chip on his shoulder it is because of this that I want him on the Cardinals next year.


Seriously though my choice is none of the three, I hope we get Asante Samuel, but if I have to choose those three I say Fanaca.

 

[CardinalChris]

As in the lets be dumb and use all of our cap for roster bonuses Cards strategy the answer is no.

As in the lets do something in between lets use roster bonuses and signing bonuses smart strategy, yes.

Extending Fitz would lower our cap considerably since he will count 15 mill next year. That number will be cut in half at a minimum if he is extended.

http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/vb/showpost.php?p=1471518&postcount=94

And we have quite a bit of cap room next year, even before any type of renegotiation with Fitz.