Just show me where I said that, I will respond.
I did VERY CLEARLY SAY THIS:
Once the organization is turned around, I would fire Whiz, and hire someone to improve the team on the field.
Again, just tell me where I said anything to that nature, and I will respond.
You wanna say that you don't think Whiz had a big influence on turning the ORGANIZATION (not roster, that is a different word all together with different meaning) around from the ridiculousness that we saw in the early 2000's then that is fine. To each his own. That is what I was stating, and that is what I was talking about. I would be happy to debate that.
If you want to say that you think Arians and Keim did a better job building a team (aka a roster, again, different word than organization) then do so. Because I agree, and even said as much in the original post. Just see above in my first response where I very clearly, in bold, point that out. So, yes, one could argue this point.....you just need to find opposition to it first.
I can only speak on the words I write, not the ones in your head.