QuebecCard
ASFN Addict
Thanks. The interrogative pronoun is the object of the verb "love" here.
I'll defer. Not my first language and I'm confused.
Thanks. The interrogative pronoun is the object of the verb "love" here.
I dated a girl in college who’s thesis was on subject/object ambiguity in architecture. So there’s that also.
as well is probably the best.too.
The Cardinals are in a spot where likely all of the "blue chip" prospects will be gone.
I like AVT, but I don't like using first round picks on guards. Even with his positional versatility, his best spot is likely guard.
I like Farley also, but his medicals ARE a concern, even though I think he has the highest ceiling of the CBs in the draft. I can see passing on him and I can see drafting him. Newsome is similar.
Outside of the top three receivers, none are really worthy of #16.
I hate the idea of using another high pick on an ILB.
Edge isn't a big enough need and none of the edge players are significantly better than other positions.
I like the idea of Najee Harris, but the position has been a bit devalued.
As I said, I want a good football player. With all of this taken into account, I probably will now cast my vote for AVT. Murray is the franchise and what better way to commit to him than by protecting him.
So if you were the GM and truly believed he was that good would you select Moore with the 16th pick?Perfect world we get Horn at #16 and Rondale Moore at #49. 2 potential stars.
I think Moore is going to be OROTY
So if you were the GM and truly believed he was that good would you select Moore with the 16th pick?
- The word who should be used when the person it’s describing is the subject of a sentence
- The word whom should be used when the person it’s describing is the object of a sentence, or if it comes after a preposition.
***WHOM***
In general for this draft, here are guys who I really like at various stages. I will skip round 1 because I feel I have posted that in multiple places.
Kenneth Gainwell RB Memphis
Elijah Mitchell RB Louisiana
Walker Little OT Stanford
Quinn Meinerz OL Wisconsin Whitewater
Daviyon Nixon DL Iowa
Jayson Oweh - EDGE Penn St
Payton Turner EDGE Houston
Chris Rumph EDGE Duke
Dylan Moses LB Alabama
Ifeatu Melifonwu CB Syracuse
Robert Rochell CB Central Arkansas
Ar'Darius Washington S TCU
How many third and shorts did we not convert last year? Answer: Najee Harris.
It’s actually scary how the least valuable positions on both sides of the ball are being discussed as real possibilities at #16.Not going to lie but I won't be disappointed with Najee even though the value kind of sucks.
Najee reminds me so much of Steven Jackson and if his career mirrored Jackson, the Cardinals wouldn't be disappointed. I think with Murray being smaller, it would be nice to have a big, hulking back lined up in the backfield.
Conner has good size and Chase would be a good third down back. RB would become a pretty good strength for the Cardinals.
I dated a girl in college who’s thesis was on subject/object ambiguity in architecture. So there’s that also.
***WHOM***
It’s actually scary how the least valuable positions on both sides of the ball are being discussed as real possibilities at #16.
Now I am thinking it is going to be Devonta Smith.
I think there’s a lot of eye of the beholder differentiation in that range. Also bc we could use a wr, ol, cb, rb, dt, edge, lb, or te it gives us a lot of flexibility.A move down is the most ideal I've seen in any of the years I've followed the draft. The difference in value in #16 and #30 is minimal.