Why didnt we make a bigger play for McNabb?

English on tour

Eng-gur-land Eng-gur-land
Joined
Sep 4, 2004
Posts
4,263
Reaction score
49
Location
Whitley Bay, England
Just sitting at my desk thinking about the last few weeks and given that it seems that Matt was never Whiz's guy, it seems strange we didnt go after him :shrug:
 
Last edited:

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
Maybe because he is a PITA prima donna and the Cards didn't want another one ( see ML ).
 

mrbyte

Be careful what you wish for.
Joined
Sep 5, 2008
Posts
649
Reaction score
18
Location
Coventry, England
I see what you are saying...but personally i'm glad we didn't go for him as Wally said he's a PITA, he gives me the heebegeebees just looking at his cheesy grin. I wouldn't have lasted the season having to watch him every week :)
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,266
Reaction score
12,290
Location
York, PA
Not Whiz's kind of guy. Being from Syracuse, I know things about McNabb that I don't necessarily want to share on this board. Character is questionable, plus he can't stay healthy.
 
OP
OP
English on tour

English on tour

Eng-gur-land Eng-gur-land
Joined
Sep 4, 2004
Posts
4,263
Reaction score
49
Location
Whitley Bay, England
Not Whiz's kind of guy. Being from Syracuse, I know things about McNabb that I don't necessarily want to share on this board. Character is questionable, plus he can't stay healthy.

All valid points, but i would be a hell of a lot more confident 3 titles off the belt if we had him right now.

....or Big Ben (joke:barf:)
 

LarryStalling

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Posts
1,144
Reaction score
112
$. couldn't afford both he and Leinart. Wait could not afford Leinart either.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,860
Reaction score
42,001
Location
Colorado
Because we would have had even more discussions about Leinart not getting a chance. The same would have happened if we signed Jason Campbell. Whiz said Leinart would get a fair shake, and so he didn't bring in a big name to challenge him. Leinart failed to establish himself as a significantly better option than DA, and so Da is starting.

The one thing to remember through all of this is that Leinart was given the best opportunity that he could ask for and he failed.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Not Whiz's kind of guy. Being from Syracuse, I know things about McNabb that I don't necessarily want to share on this board. Character is questionable, plus he can't stay healthy.
What is questionable about McNabb's character?
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Because we would have had even more discussions about Leinart not getting a chance. The same would have happened if we signed Jason Campbell. Whiz said Leinart would get a fair shake, and so he didn't bring in a big name to challenge him. Leinart failed to establish himself as a significantly better option than DA, and so Da is starting.

The one thing to remember through all of this is that Leinart was given the best opportunity that he could ask for and he failed.

I think, "Whiz the politician" aided and abetted by a compliant local press corps, could have found the language justifying the hiring of say, Campbell and DA as competitors for the job.

"We are always looking for opportunities to improve our team depth", Graves said. "Matt has worked hard in the offseason and matured. He is still very much in the running", added Coach Whisenhunt.

Then, they could have shopped ML at the draft for just about anything, and after a few days of controversy... the fans would be back to the "In Whiz I Trust" mantra.

Almost any other approach would have been better then what has occurred.
 

moklerman

Rise from the Ashes III
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
5,318
Reaction score
810
Location
Bakersfield, CA
The one thing to remember through all of this is that Leinart was given the best opportunity that he could ask for and he failed.
Yeah, all of those turnovers and lost games this year...
 

azsportsfan01

Registered
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Posts
2,199
Reaction score
1
Location
Bristol, CT
We didn't trade for him because it cost a 2nd rounder this year, meaning no Daryl Washington, and a conditional pick next season. Way too much to give up for McNabb.
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
Better question is why we didn't go after Bulger, he along with Anderson would be a nice 1-2 QB combo, it would push Anderson to #2 and you could put either Hall or Skelton at #3 and the other on the PS.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
We didn't trade for him because it cost a 2nd rounder this year, meaning no Daryl Washington, and a conditional pick next season. Way too much to give up for McNabb.

If you are of the opinion that McNabb would be a good QB for us(i myself have doubts but he would have been a much better option then DA) then a good QB over Washington would have been a very easy choice to make. Plus we traded a 3rd rounder to move up to get Washington so we would have still had another 3rd rounder to work with along with the Roberts pick to still pick another LB if we saw fit to.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,869
Reaction score
16,679
Better question is why we didn't go after Bulger, he along with Anderson would be a nice 1-2 QB combo, it would push Anderson to #2 and you could put either Hall or Skelton at #3 and the other on the PS.

Well, it's doubtful that we could have stashed either rookie on the PS. There was plenty of talk about Skelton as a huge prospect down the road and we gave up too much already just to get him. As for Max Hall, I'll never understand how he went undrafted but he would not have made it to the practice squad. I forget which one but I saw at least one scouting publication that had him as the 6th or 7th best QB prospect in the draft.

Steve
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,291
Reaction score
14,397
"the" thing they talked about in terms of Leinart's failings was the fact that he failed to gain the confidence of the team. Gambo / Ash observed that during the whole process over the last two weeks, not a single teammate stood up for him.

Here is what I find interesting about McNabb -- this year his old teammates in Philly seem happy to have him gone. I just find that curious.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
Here is what I find interesting about McNabb -- this year his old teammates in Philly seem happy to have him gone. I just find that curious.

Pretty interesting similarities isn't it. In fact a few stood up for Kolb publicly and by all accounts a lot more stood up for him behind closed doors as well. There was without a doubt a locker room issue going on in Philly as well.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,470
Reaction score
40,072
Location
Las Vegas
Would you give up Daryl Washington to have a 1 or 2 year Mcnabb rental? I wouldn't.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,860
Reaction score
42,001
Location
Colorado
Yeah, all of those turnovers and lost games this year...

If you have spent 3 years in a system, splitting time between starting and backing up a hall of fame QB, you have no excuses. Facts are that Leinart failed to significantly outplay a QB who had been in the system for less than 6 months, and who had rookie wide receivers to work with. Leinart failed, pure and simple.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,291
Reaction score
14,397
Pretty interesting similarities isn't it. In fact a few stood up for Kolb publicly and by all accounts a lot more stood up for him behind closed doors as well. There was without a doubt a locker room issue going on in Philly as well.

even more so in that the Eagles won with McNabb.

Winning tends to smooth things over-- no so in this case
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
Would you give up Daryl Washington to have a 1 or 2 year Mcnabb rental? I wouldn't.

Depends on if they worked out an extension or not.

Without a shadow of a doubt and twice on Sundays I take the Good QB(any good QB this doesn't have to apply to just McNabb) for 3-4 years then any LB in the league past, present or future.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,669
Location
CA
Because we would have had even more discussions about Leinart not getting a chance. The same would have happened if we signed Jason Campbell. Whiz said Leinart would get a fair shake, and so he didn't bring in a big name to challenge him. Leinart failed to establish himself as a significantly better option than DA, and so Da is starting.

The one thing to remember through all of this is that Leinart was given the best opportunity that he could ask for and he failed.
Does that really matter? There obviously was a huge controversy and media circus with D.A. and Matt was dropped, much better to have a perrenial pro-bowler and champioship caliber QB than a journeyman never was...
 
Top