Wilks said he is committed to “playing the best 11.” That obviously wasn’t the case for the first 3 games. Does he really expect us to believe that Bradford was/is better than Rosen?
One reason: $20 million
I think if we would have drafted Rosen first and then added Bradford later, things may have played out differently. But we paid Bradford 15 mil guaranteed this year so he was obviously named the started. Remember we had no QB under contract when Bradford was signed and this board was exploding. Mgt signed Bradford not know how well the Rosen pick would work out.
Honestly who cares about the money. It actually reminds me of the difference between the Cards organization and the one they played today...
If you recall Seattle signed Matt Flynn from Green Bay in 2012 (everyone thought he was going to be the next breakout qb) only to draft Russell Wilson in the 3rd round. Before the season started they named Wilson the starter because it was evident he was a leader and the man for the job. They go on to win 11 games that year and the rest is history.
yup. They gave Matt Flyyn 9 million guaranteed... saw Wilson was better, cut bait on Flynn before the season even started and the rest was history.
Wilks said he is committed to “playing the best 11.” That obviously wasn’t the case for the first 3 games. Does he really expect us to believe that Bradford was/is better than Rosen?
Dumb coaches?Same reason Allen and Mayfield didn't start week one, come on now
No real difference other than going 0-3 and exposing our historical ineptitude to the world. Do you think the other players have enjoyed their first four games here? They’ve already lost an enormous following in AZ due to this start. “No difference . . . “ cmon . . .So we played Bradford less than 3 games and cut bait. No real difference. Remember, we had no QB at the time and our fan base was hostile.