he was banged up one season... and KC had no problem signing him. knee issues is code for "not cheap enough" IMO.
have there been ANY reports from kc that Breaston is having knee issues?
Don't you think there was areason for as good as team guy as he was, the team literally made NO attempt to sign him? This wasn't a Dansby or Rolle situation where guys left other offers from the Cards on the table. FACT: Breaston has had recurring knee issues on BOTH knees. He's a slight player who plays the slot.
Why do you even ask that last question? Really cheese really? You figured we we would be hearing about his knee two weeks into camp? Is that really your justification for how little of a risk his knee issues are? Because if so that's a terrible argument point blank. If you expected to hear about knee issues two weeks in then you probably expected Amare Stoudamire to spontaneously combust the minute he signed with the Knicks too.
We cant say for sure Breaston will break down or not, but given the information at hand and how I'm pretty freaking sure the staff has a better idea then the arm chair QBs here at ASFN just how much risk is there, seems pretty smart not to give dude 5 years. All relevant data on FA signings pretty much point to KC cutting him at some point before the end of his deal anyway.
And like K9 tried to point out, Wiz didn't say he wanted a Breaston type player, he said he wanted to give a similar opportunity to a young player, completely negating the entire point of your first post and many others in this thread. Oh FYI - Roberts and Doucet were both better prospects and drafted higher then Breaston so maybe the team is on to something here?
Sheesh who would have thought K9 as the voice of reason over the past few
days? I like it.