Will Briggs get franchised?

General Chaos

Gronko = Man Beast
Joined
Mar 3, 2003
Posts
934
Reaction score
42
Location
Dallas
Winds of change bear watching

January 30, 2007
BY MIKE MULLIGAN Staff Reporter
MIAMI -- For a team that boasts about its rich tradition and proud history, the Bears have been trying to escape the past all season. What's thrilling about the current Super Bowl run isn't the 20 years of sorrow that preceded it, but the enthralling promise of tomorrow that a championship would indicate.
Maybe the Bears won't be able to bring back all 22 starters next fall, as they did this season, but there's nothing wrong with trying to do so. That starts with putting a franchise tag on linebacker Lance Briggs, something that seemed preposterous when contract talks broke off a week before the draft last April but that now looks imminent.

The Bears can't afford to lose Briggs for nothing, so you can consider it a lock that they'll bite the bullet and settle on a one-year deal for more than $7 million that is the average of the league's five highest-paid linebackers. That's when things will get interesting. What does Briggs do when the Bears slap him with the franchise tag by Feb. 22?

Does a guy making $721,600 this season jump at the chance for multimillions, or does a Drew Rosenhaus client follow the lead of defensive end Adewale Ogunleye -- whose acquisition brought Rosenhaus into the Bears' locker room -- and refuse to sign the tender offer in an attempt to force a trade?

''I will worry about all that stuff when I get to it,'' Briggs said. ''All I know is I have played my ass off since I have been here, and good things come to those who work hard. Things are going to be all right.''

Briggs would be the hottest name on the market if he hits free agency, but it's unlikely any team would give up two first-round picks to sign him if he wears a franchise tag. The league's new collective bargaining agreement allows a team to franchise a player for only two consecutive years, so Briggs could be patient and wait the Bears out.


Time for him to fly?
He turned down a long-term deal in the offseason believed to pay about $5.5 million annually over five or six years. Long-term deals are how players get their guarantees in the NFL because lengthy contracts come with lump signing bonuses and other secured money. The one-year franchise tender would ensure Briggs his one-year contract and nothing more.
There has been speculation Briggs turned down the long-term deal in part because he wants to escape the shadow of Brian Urlacher, something Briggs dismissed Monday, saying that it might be tough to be in another player's shadow, but Urlacher is such an unassuming superstar that he's a pleasure to play beside. Last week the denial wasn't as strong. Asked if he wanted to strike out on his own, Briggs said, ''It's not so much that.''

''I enjoy being with Brian,'' Briggs said. ''I enjoy being with these guys. That is all I can really say about that. Brian is a special guy. I have been fortunate and blessed to be able to come into this league and have him as the guy I am in the room with every day.''

General manager Jerry Angelo has said he doesn't like to use tags on players because it creates animosity with the player and isn't a long-term solution. But in the case of Briggs, the Bears would be foolish to do anything else. They are built on defense, and they have serious issues to deal with at other positions, primarily defensive tackle.

Tommie Harris is ahead of schedule in his return from hamstring surgery and should be ready for training camp. Tank Johnson proved to be a major distraction late in the season and is a long shot to get a long-term contract. Ian Scott and Alfonso Boone are both headed to free agency with Super Bowl credentials. As often happens in the NFL, players from Super Bowl teams tend to attract offers even if they're not part of the core group.


Bears will wait to decide on Briggs
The Bears likely will lose both Scott and Boone. They drafted Dusty Dvoracek in the third round last year, but he missed the season after foot surgery. The front seven can't take the double blows of losing so much at tackle and trying to replace a Pro Bowl linebacker.
''Whether it's Briggs or anyone else,'' team president Ted Phillips said, ''my feeling is when teams have players become free agents, they have certain options they can choose to exercise or not, and we're going to look at every option we have before we make a decision on Lance. The franchise tag isn't used that often leaguewide. I can't remember the last time we used it. Bryan Robinson? That one didn't work out so well.''

The good news for Phillips and the Bears is that they have an option with Briggs. There is the possibility he'll be gone in the offseason, but the team will get something in return. That's solid business.

The hot rumor of the day, however, hints at where the real trouble will come in the offseason. Coach Lovie Smith was asked about a broadcast report that special-teams coordinator Dave Toub is headed to Philadelphia to take the same position with the Eagles. Smith laughed off the idea, saying Toub was coaching at practice earlier in the day and wondering why anyone would ever want to coach anywhere else but Chicago.

Could that have been a dig by Smith at his own contract situation, which was put on hold until after the Super Bowl? Five assistant coaches are coming out of contracts, including Toub, who no doubt will attract offers from several teams when his deal expires Feb. 28.

The Bears have exclusive negotiating rights with Toub for three weeks starting on the Tuesday after the Super Bowl. Ditto defensive coordinator Ron Rivera and wide receivers coach Darryl Drake. The contracts of college scouting director Greg Gabriel and pro personnel director Bobby DePaul both expire May 31.

Briggs probably will be back, but there are no tags that can keep those important figures as members of the franchise.
 

Skkorpion

Grey haired old Bird
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Posts
11,026
Reaction score
5
Location
Sun City, AZ
Thanks for posting that. Briggs is very good but I think he was nuts to turn down a multi-year contract at $5.5 per year. I wouldn't touch him. Too mercinary and too much ego.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,301
Reaction score
1,175
Location
SE Valley
Briggs is very good but I think he was nuts to turn down a multi-year contract at $5.5 per year. I wouldn't touch him. Too mercinary and too much ego.
Seriously, what's the guy thinking?

5.5 mil X 5 years = 27.5 mil, so figure $10 mil guaranteed and 3.5 mil per year; vs. one year at $7 mil, no guarantee...

:shrug:
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
14,681
Reaction score
6,774
Location
Mesa, AZ
Thanks for posting that. Briggs is very good but I think he was nuts to turn down a multi-year contract at $5.5 per year. I wouldn't touch him. Too mercinary and too much ego.

I actually think it is less than 50% they franchise him (JMHO). If anyone takes a long hard look at the Cards/Bears game, he was missing tackles horribly that night (as well as several other games). He is a playmaker but what gets lost too often is the number of plays he completely blows it/whiffs a tackle.

I like the guy and all but if he goes, I don't think it is devastating in any way.
 

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
The Bears will keep him, make no mistake about it.

I just can't foresee them letting the backbone of their defense (Urlacher may be the heart and soul of it, but Briggs is the backbone) walk.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,737
Reaction score
6,623
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Agreed. Briggs is a good player and without a doubt an upgrade over the Orlando Huff's and Daryl Blackstock's of the world, but he's certainly not as good as he thinks he is which is a franchise-type defensive player. I'd rather see us fill as many holes as possible and build up the depth this offseason than swing for the fences with a guy like Briggs.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
Seriously, what's the guy thinking?

5.5 mil X 5 years = 27.5 mil, so figure $10 mil guaranteed and 3.5 mil per year; vs. one year at $7 mil, no guarantee...

:shrug:

Not crazy at all.

That totals out to only 37.5 Mill. He will make at least 10 more mill, then that with much more gauranteed if he signs a long term deal this year.

Also once the franchise tag is signed by the player it is gauranteed, even if they for some reason are cut. Not long term of course but the 7 Mill is gauranteed. It is not like a normal base salary.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,301
Reaction score
1,175
Location
SE Valley
Not crazy at all.

That totals out to only 37.5 Mill. He will make at least 10 more mill, then that with much more gauranteed if he signs a long term deal this year.
No, 10+(3.5X5)=27.5. But whatever, I am more interested in hearing why you think Briggs will get that much greater a contract post season than he was already (reportedly) offered?

Also once the franchise tag is signed by the player it is gauranteed, even if they for some reason are cut. Not long term of course but the 7 Mill is gauranteed. It is not like a normal base salary.
On this point, I stand corrected! :)
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
No, 10+(3.5X5)=27.5. But whatever, I am more interested in hearing why you think Briggs will get that much greater a contract post season than he was already (reportedly) offered?

The 5.5 Mill in the article I believe was only concerning base salary, not cap hit, and not including base. At least that is what I remember of the contract he refused a while ago which was closer to 40 Mill then 30 Mill.

Also thats only a contract the Bears have been offering him, not a sign of what his price tag is in an open FA market. For example Hayes contract extension is a total of $21 million with $8 million guaranteed. Do you reall ythink Briggs is going to sign a contract not much bigger then that. With the average cap amount per team to be an average of 20 Mill, and no real competition in the FA market, you guys better be ready for some really outlandish contracts that will look crazy only in the confines of the old cap system not in the new. Just take a look at the average base salary (not including gauranteed money) of the top 5 LB's, its 7 Mill. That should give you a good baseline and why its easy for me to say......

Briggs and Adalius Thomas will easily get 12 or more gauranteed, and over 40 Mill contract total.
 

lobo

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Posts
3,310
Reaction score
230
Location
Inverness, Il
Thanks for posting that. Briggs is very good but I think he was nuts to turn down a multi-year contract at $5.5 per year. I wouldn't touch him. Too mercinary and too much ego.

i am at the other end of the contiuum on this one....i watched every game he played this year...my observation....as good as urlacher on the outside as urlacher is in the middle....better at shedding blocks and actually as fast as...he would be a great addition for us.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
i am at the other end of the contiuum on this one....i watched every game he played this year...my observation....as good as urlacher on the outside as urlacher is in the middle....better at shedding blocks and actually as fast as...he would be a great addition for us.
:thumbup:
If we could bring in Briggs I'd literally do a cartwheel.
 

lobo

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Posts
3,310
Reaction score
230
Location
Inverness, Il
:thumbup:
If we could bring in Briggs I'd literally do a cartwheel.


of course i would as well...as cheap as the bears are they will not let him get away...although they have a history of letting all-pro types walk...just take a look at the two years after the year they won the superbowl....that team should have won two or three superbowls
 

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
13,963
Reaction score
4,144
Location
annapolis, md
i hear people say he is old so they like adalius thomas more, but i was under the impression that thomas has been around two or three more years....whos the vet?
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
1,965
Reaction score
188
Thomas is 4 years older than Briggs. I wont be surprised to see Briggs get $45-50 million in this market. I heard a rumor that the Dolphins are prepared to make Samuel the highest paid corner in the game. Dont know if this is true or not
 

OldDirtMcGirt

Registered User
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Posts
1,255
Reaction score
0
On a Bears fan station, Briggs said something to the effect of "What better way to spend my last season in Chicago than at the Super Bowl". So it seems as if contract talks have all but evaporated, which is definitely good for us. Even if we don't sign Briggs, we could still get Na'il Diggs or Cato June.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
On a Bears fan station, Briggs said something to the effect of "What better way to spend my last season in Chicago than at the Super Bowl". So it seems as if contract talks have all but evaporated, which is definitely good for us. Even if we don't sign Briggs, we could still get Na'il Diggs or Cato June.

I'm with you on Diggs or June, and would be content with either. My sense is that it will be extremely difficult to do much better, and same goes for upgrades at corner. No team is in cap hell and the number of quality FA's this year is less than stellar.

Big dollars chasing a few quality free agents; sounds like a seller's market to me.

Maybe that's why Whis was talking about needed depth and not starters in a few of his interviews. He perhaps realizes that the chance of a coup (Briggs, Thomas, Samuel, Clement) are rather slim.
 

OldDirtMcGirt

Registered User
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Posts
1,255
Reaction score
0
I'm with you on Diggs or June, and would be content with either. My sense is that it will be extremely difficult to do much better, and same goes for upgrades at corner. No team is in cap hell and the number of quality FA's this year is less than stellar.

Big dollars chasing a few quality free agents; sounds like a seller's market to me.

Maybe that's why Whis was talking about needed depth and not starters in a few of his interviews. He perhaps realizes that the chance of a coup (Briggs, Thomas, Samuel, Clement) are rather slim.

I agree, especially when it comes to corners, you just know that somebody is going to break the bank signing Clements or Samuel. We coud definitely get more bang for our buck targeting guys like Roderick Hood or Ricky Manning Jr. as a CB, Ken Hamlin at FS (especially since we now have Teryl Austin), Diggs and June at WLB, and BJ Sams as a KR.
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
1,965
Reaction score
188
free agency:

Hood
Ken Hamlin
June or Kawika Mitchell

Draft

Jamal Anderson (Joe Thomas wont be there. Are the Lions throwing out a smokescreen?

Tony Ugoh or Staley( If they are gone Josh Wilson

Tony Hunt or Tanard Jackson
 
Top