Would You Want The Suns To Do This Trade?

Would You Want The Suns To Do This Trade?

  • Yes

    Votes: 11 22.9%
  • No

    Votes: 37 77.1%

  • Total voters
    48

Cody

i love defense
Joined
May 3, 2005
Posts
901
Reaction score
0
The one with the rumor going around....

Collins, Harpring, the 34th selection, and Kirilenko to Phoenix for the 21st selection, Quentin Richardson, and Shawn Marion.




I WOULDN'T DO IT! Q, yes.....Marion is WAY to valuable
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,247
Reaction score
59,852
Cody said:
The one with the rumor going around....

Collins, Harpring, the 34th selection, and Kirilenko to Phoenix for the 21st selection, Quentin Richardson, and Shawn Marion.




I WOULDN'T DO IT! Q, yes.....Marion is WAY to valuable


I agree this would be a terrible trade.

Why not give Utah our first born son as well (wasn't Kirilenko also injured last year)? I do like Kirilenko but not for this proposed trade.
 
Last edited:

asudevil83

Registered User
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Posts
2,061
Reaction score
1
it would take the #6 instead of the #34 and Collins to get me to do the trade....at least. and even then i probably wouldnt do it. chemistry is harder to come by than talent, and i'm not saying that Utah's trade would give us bad chemistry, but we've already established a good set.
 

JS22

Say Vandelay!
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Posts
5,791
Reaction score
211
Cody said:
The one with the rumor going around....

Collins, Harpring, the 34th selection, and Kirilenko to Phoenix for the 21st selection, Quentin Richardson, and Shawn Marion.




I WOULDN'T DO IT! Q, yes.....Marion is WAY to valuable

You might want to edit your post... The trade is wrong.

Its:

Marion
Richardson
#21

For

Kirelenko
Harpring
Collins
#6
#34

And in that case, yes, I would.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,247
Reaction score
59,852
WastedFate said:
You might want to edit your post... The trade is wrong.

Its:

Marion
Richardson
#21

For

Kirelenko
Harpring
Collins
#6
#34

And in that case, yes, I would.

If this is the actual trade proposal, I would do it as well providing Kirilenko is healthy. It would solve alot of the Suns' problems. Do I think it will happen? No.
 

JS22

Say Vandelay!
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Posts
5,791
Reaction score
211
Mainstreet said:
If this is the actual trade proposal, I would do it as well providing Kirilenko is healthy. It would solve alot of the Suns' problems. Do I think it will happen? No.

In actuality, the trade is most likely a silly rumor. (I'd say theres about a 2% chance of it being true.) But, according to the "rumor" it's the proposed trade.

Do I think it will happen? Nope!
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
One of the reasons it got so much attention is that it not a terrible idea. It really depends on AK's health and who you get with the #6.

Without the #6, I'd probably not do it even though it could work. With the #6 I have to give it serious consideration - especially if Deron Williams was around at #6.
 

nothin' but net

All Star
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Posts
512
Reaction score
0
Location
SE Arizona
With the change in the picks I would be more tempted to pull the trigger. By keeping the games fairly close with the Spurs, I think we have proven quite a bit this year. Team chemistry was exemplary for most of the year. Marion POSSIBLY had a problem at the end of the season.

Although the proposed trade with the #6 pick seems to work well enough to want to trade, I can't agree to it. When you redefine the league in one season and make it to the WCFwith 2 new starters, I don't think you need to move two starters again. Fact: with a better BENCH, we could have taken the Spurs. I have heard for years that the Suns have a "young nucleus" that they are building around. That nucleus has included Marbury, Big Jake, and too many others to list. Our starting 5 can beat any other starting 5 in the league. Let's give these guys another year to gel even more and see where that takes us.

Draft picks are nice, but to win in the playoffs we need more veteran role players. Trading away two starters reeks of "rebuilding" to me. I think with this year's success we should think fine tuning. Shaq and Duncan are the heart of their teams right now. I can't see them getting any more effective against Amare. I can, however, see Amare getting much better against them.

I do think there should be some adjustments made. Q should post up more and develop a mid range shot. It would be interesting to see them do more at the PG with an offensive set that works better for JJ for a different look. I would just like to see these issues resolved without adding any different starters to the mix.
 

PhxGametime

Formerly Bball_31
Joined
Jul 27, 2002
Posts
2,010
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
The problem about Deron Williams though, is when I read it, it stated the Jazz would do the Trade if Deron Williams wasn't available at #6... so the Suns wouldn't have a shot at him.


I really like Raymond Felton though, he could run the team, every bit as well. I just don't think of Kirilenko or Harping as speed burners - Marion runs the court probably better than any player in League but yet can run to the 3PT line as well and Q runs better than Harping... the injuries sort of are a problem for me.

I'm not sure Trading 2 starters for replacements is worth the #6 Pick - if you don't Draft a bigman. I do really like Felton though but I'm not sure there's a bigman worth the #6 Pick. I like Frye but that's awfully high... if Diogu shoots up higher and higher the Draftboards maybe but that's too high IMO as well.

I really like Danny Granger but is more of a 3/4.


If Diogu is worth the #6 Pick to the Suns... Diogu and Harping help the toughness and rebounding, Kirilenko is a good replacement for Marion and the #34 Pick would be very valuable.

I doubt the Trade rumor is legit. I'm not sure if I'd make Trade or not...
 

asudevil83

Registered User
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Posts
2,061
Reaction score
1
the problem with taking the #6 is the fact that the only reason we'd get it is if the guys that the jazz want (and we) wont be available.

ANYTHING that can be available at the #6 would have an equal shot at being available at the #12.....especially now that Deron Williams will likely stay at Illinois with his ankle all messed up.

i would honestly say that the #6 pick has just about as much value as the #10.....their isnt ANYTHING special about it. now if it were for the #4, then i'd consider it.....but the jazz wouldnt.

its a catch-22. if we want it then so do the jazz so they wouldnt consider the proposal. if they dont want it, then neither do we, so we shouldnt consider this proposal.
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,366
Reaction score
32,015
Location
Scottsdale, Az
The trade seems pretty fair, I am just suprised Boozer isn't the guy Utah would want to move.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,508
Reaction score
2,344
Location
ASFN
I wouldnt trade Marion for any SF in the game. Except maybe AK lol. Crazy rumor. I dont think it is true, but I might consider it...
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
I say no but I'd rather have Boozer than Collins, but even if they threw in Boozer I would't accept. We are a couple of additions away from beating the Spurs taking Marion away would set us back. Draft and sign smartly and we'll be fine.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,247
Reaction score
59,852
The reason to make the trade, IMO, is that Marion and Q were not able to get their shots off inside against San Antonio nor were they able to adequately to defend inside either against height and cutters (Ginobili and Parker). I understand AK is a good defender and he also knows how to score inside.

Another thing to consider, is as Nash gets older the Suns will need to be more selective in their running and use more and more of a setup half court offense when they cannot run. AK provides another inside threat in the half court and I don't recall AK being slow at all.

I'm an avid Suns fan and I do not want to lose core players (Marion) unless it improves the team. However, as I view the team today, the key players for the Suns are Stoudemire, Nash and JJ. AK (if healthy) would replace Marion as a core player plus the Suns would acquire some bench players and some good draft picks for our future.

I, personally, don't think Utah would do the trade but I think the Suns would be severely tempted if they want that Championship.
 

SweetD

Next Up
Supporting Member
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Jan 15, 2003
Posts
9,865
Reaction score
173
Location
Gilbert, AZ
IMO AK is overrrated. Marion does just as much as AK the only thing the Suns would get is another player that can create his own shot. But with Amare, Nash, and JJ I don't see why we would want another player that needs the ball to create his own shot.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
suns trade

ok i this is my first post and i have read all the replies that this espn radio trade speculation has brought from all us suns fans. What you all need to do (and this is a familiar problem on most team message boards is take off the orange and purple tinted sunglasses. I do not think this trade will go through but if it is being talked about the conversation is definatly being pushed by the suns. If Utah thinks that they need to scrap the core they put together last year and go with different players then switching picks does not make much sense as this will be extremely valuable tool in rebuilding. If they feel their core is solid and they are just a peice or two away and some better luck health wise than getting rid of the foundation in AK is not a good idea. From the suns point of view (if this is actually what we can get....) this is a trade you make in a second and there are a number of reasons.

#1 Andrei Kirilenko is IMO one of the two or three most underrated players in the game (w/ JOE and the headcase that is Artest). LIke Artest Kirilinko can dominate the game defensivly from a wing position. Inside-out there is no better defender in the league. Because he was injured does not mean we should forget the numbers he put up (didnt he lead the league in blocked shots a year ago....?)before last years injury. Infact at the beginning of the season, I thought Utah and the Suns were both going to be the big surprises of the season. Then AK got hurt and there season evaporated. that should show his value there. Marion has had better reboubding numbers but thats because he played the four for us and he was our primary glass eater. Marion is much more athletic but we are getting the far superior BASKETBALL PLAYER in AK. NO less than the round mound was touting him as one of the best ten players in the game. He doenst get the exposure but he is legit.
#2 For all the people who feel that the suns can beat the spurs with shawn as the primary PF, you are very wrong. While a healthy JJ and bench would have helped, Nazr and TD just got off shots and boards at will. We can still run but we need to control the backboards and play at least a little interior D to get by san antonio. thats a fact. Adding to this is the fact that shawn value will never be as high as it is right now. As an olympian, 3rd team all nba, and getting ripped off by the all defensive team, Shawn Marion has exceeded the expectations of even his own family and friends could have hoped for. Saying all this, his inability to get off his own shot is a big detriment to the team. My friends would of often wonder why I was never as big a fan of Shawns game when the numbers showed he was a star. It was my contention that I would watch a game and then look at the box score and think "how did he get those numbers?" I came to realize that while he stuffs the stat box, he doesnt seem to come up with those numbers when the team needs him most. Now he did alot to dispell that feeling this year for me, and i ahve grown toreally appreciate his role on the team but he is not a max money player...
#3$$$$$$....and this is probaly the biggest reason. While both shawn and Q have value, you have to look at it from a cost-benefit value. Are they worth the 19 some odd million the two make a year. No one can sit here and say they should be making one third of the payroll. The two peices that the team needs to build around are STAT and JJ. I read on the other thread that good teams base their teams around three players and the other parts are interchangable. It makes sense because you wont win w/ 5 high priced starters and no one coming off the bench who plays within their role. With the money saved we would have more flexibility, as well as the money to give to the two players who spent the playoffs showing a glimpse of their promise (i think amare and JJ have what it takes to be the best 1-2 in the NBA after next year) IF we can get two good bench players and the sixth pick, this not only makes us a contender but a legitimate dynasty in the making with all the key parts locked up for the forseeable future.
What the spurs had that the suns were missing was they had more players who made the right decisions at the important times. And alot of those guys are making 1/10 of what shawn makes. I like him as a player but if we are going to take advantadge of our experience this year, there needs to be more help. Now while i think there is no way in salt lake that Utah makes this trade I do have a trade that i think makes too much sense.
Sixers get- shawn marion and another spare part

Suns get- andre igoudola and sam dalembert

why the sixers do it: with cwebb on the team for the next few seasons and AI getting up there in age the sixers need to win now...Marion is the perfect player for this team b/c he does not need the ball in his hands to be effective, he plays strong perimeter d, and is athletic...all things philly needs. He makes a lot of money but i think dalembert is up on contract and would need a new deal anyway. The sixers become instant contenders and still have enough young players (korver, green) where they are not totally mortgaging the future.
why the suns do it: from a financial stand point, two players making money are easier on flexability than one (see kings trade this year)so while that is a factor i think this makes just as much basketball sense. Andre has the potential to be another marion and with him on the bench, we have the best collection of wing players in the NBA. Dalembert while no world beater is a young solid rebounder and interior defender. Even more important, he doesnt hurt the suns up and down style because he runs like a gazelle.

While last year was what i have been waiting for since 93', the suns need to see where they are deficient and address accordingly so we dont waste steve nash while he still can play at a high level. While it would take guts to move a starter, in the long term it is the right move and we could be a contender for the next 5-6 years......
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,247
Reaction score
59,852
Arizona's Finest said:
Now while i think there is no way in salt lake that Utah makes this trade I do have a trade that i think makes too much sense.
Sixers get- shawn marion and another spare part

Suns get- andre igoudola and sam dalembert

why the sixers do it: with cwebb on the team for the next few seasons and AI getting up there in age the sixers need to win now...Marion is the perfect player for this team b/c he does not need the ball in his hands to be effective, he plays strong perimeter d, and is athletic...all things philly needs. He makes a lot of money but i think dalembert is up on contract and would need a new deal anyway. The sixers become instant contenders and still have enough young players (korver, green) where they are not totally mortgaging the future.
why the suns do it: from a financial stand point, two players making money are easier on flexability than one (see kings trade this year)so while that is a factor i think this makes just as much basketball sense. Andre has the potential to be another marion and with him on the bench, we have the best collection of wing players in the NBA. Dalembert while no world beater is a young solid rebounder and interior defender. Even more important, he doesnt hurt the suns up and down style because he runs like a gazelle.

While last year was what i have been waiting for since 93', the suns need to see where they are deficient and address accordingly so we dont waste steve nash while he still can play at a high level. While it would take guts to move a starter, in the long term it is the right move and we could be a contender for the next 5-6 years......

I agree, I do not see Utah making this trade as last proposed. If AK were healthy he would definitely improve the Suns especially with the addition of the bench players and picks.

However, I also do not see Philly making this trade. I see Andre Igoudola as a young player of perhaps Shawn Marion's ability sooner rather than later. Also I cannot see them in a hurry to get rid of Dalembert without wanting more than he is worth. I'm afraid Philly values Andre as a rising star and quality bigs with athletic ability like Dalembert are always hard to find.

I'm afraid Philly would want to trade pretty much straight up for either of these players with fillers. I think Marion has much more value than Dalembert, but I'm not sure about Iggy. Iggy and Marion are very similar players athletically.

If I were Phoenix I would think very hard about this trade if it were actually proposed. The plus for Phoenix would be getting a center, a rising young star and probably saving money or at least dividing it between players.

No, forget it, I cannot see giving Dalembert a huge contract unless he could be resigned to a reasonable contract. He might want the moon.

I don't think Philly makes the trade because of Iggy's potential and I sure wouldn't trade Marion straight up for Dalembert with whatever fillers that would make it work.

Nice idea though. :)
 
Last edited:

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
Arizona's Finest said:
ok i this is my first post and i have read all the replies that this espn radio trade speculation has brought from all us suns fans. What you all need to do (and this is a familiar problem on most team message boards is take off the orange and purple tinted sunglasses. I do not think this trade will go through but if it is being talked about the conversation is definatly being pushed by the suns. If Utah thinks that they need to scrap the core they put together last year and go with different players then switching picks does not make much sense as this will be extremely valuable tool in rebuilding. If they feel their core is solid and they are just a peice or two away and some better luck health wise than getting rid of the foundation in AK is not a good idea. From the suns point of view (if this is actually what we can get....) this is a trade you make in a second and there are a number of reasons.

#1 Andrei Kirilenko is IMO one of the two or three most underrated players in the game (w/ JOE and the headcase that is Artest). LIke Artest Kirilinko can dominate the game defensivly from a wing position. Inside-out there is no better defender in the league. Because he was injured does not mean we should forget the numbers he put up (didnt he lead the league in blocked shots a year ago....?)before last years injury. Infact at the beginning of the season, I thought Utah and the Suns were both going to be the big surprises of the season. Then AK got hurt and there season evaporated. that should show his value there. Marion has had better reboubding numbers but thats because he played the four for us and he was our primary glass eater. Marion is much more athletic but we are getting the far superior BASKETBALL PLAYER in AK. NO less than the round mound was touting him as one of the best ten players in the game. He doenst get the exposure but he is legit.
#2 For all the people who feel that the suns can beat the spurs with shawn as the primary PF, you are very wrong. While a healthy JJ and bench would have helped, Nazr and TD just got off shots and boards at will. We can still run but we need to control the backboards and play at least a little interior D to get by san antonio. thats a fact. Adding to this is the fact that shawn value will never be as high as it is right now. As an olympian, 3rd team all nba, and getting ripped off by the all defensive team, Shawn Marion has exceeded the expectations of even his own family and friends could have hoped for. Saying all this, his inability to get off his own shot is a big detriment to the team. My friends would of often wonder why I was never as big a fan of Shawns game when the numbers showed he was a star. It was my contention that I would watch a game and then look at the box score and think "how did he get those numbers?" I came to realize that while he stuffs the stat box, he doesnt seem to come up with those numbers when the team needs him most. Now he did alot to dispell that feeling this year for me, and i ahve grown toreally appreciate his role on the team but he is not a max money player...
#3$$$$$$....and this is probaly the biggest reason. While both shawn and Q have value, you have to look at it from a cost-benefit value. Are they worth the 19 some odd million the two make a year. No one can sit here and say they should be making one third of the payroll. The two peices that the team needs to build around are STAT and JJ. I read on the other thread that good teams base their teams around three players and the other parts are interchangable. It makes sense because you wont win w/ 5 high priced starters and no one coming off the bench who plays within their role. With the money saved we would have more flexibility, as well as the money to give to the two players who spent the playoffs showing a glimpse of their promise (i think amare and JJ have what it takes to be the best 1-2 in the NBA after next year) IF we can get two good bench players and the sixth pick, this not only makes us a contender but a legitimate dynasty in the making with all the key parts locked up for the forseeable future.
What the spurs had that the suns were missing was they had more players who made the right decisions at the important times. And alot of those guys are making 1/10 of what shawn makes. I like him as a player but if we are going to take advantadge of our experience this year, there needs to be more help. Now while i think there is no way in salt lake that Utah makes this trade I do have a trade that i think makes too much sense.
Sixers get- shawn marion and another spare part

Suns get- andre igoudola and sam dalembert

why the sixers do it: with cwebb on the team for the next few seasons and AI getting up there in age the sixers need to win now...Marion is the perfect player for this team b/c he does not need the ball in his hands to be effective, he plays strong perimeter d, and is athletic...all things philly needs. He makes a lot of money but i think dalembert is up on contract and would need a new deal anyway. The sixers become instant contenders and still have enough young players (korver, green) where they are not totally mortgaging the future.
why the suns do it: from a financial stand point, two players making money are easier on flexability than one (see kings trade this year)so while that is a factor i think this makes just as much basketball sense. Andre has the potential to be another marion and with him on the bench, we have the best collection of wing players in the NBA. Dalembert while no world beater is a young solid rebounder and interior defender. Even more important, he doesnt hurt the suns up and down style because he runs like a gazelle.

While last year was what i have been waiting for since 93', the suns need to see where they are deficient and address accordingly so we dont waste steve nash while he still can play at a high level. While it would take guts to move a starter, in the long term it is the right move and we could be a contender for the next 5-6 years......

Welcome aboard.

In another post, I said I thought the AK deal might benefit the Suns if the #6 was thrown in. Without that pick, it might still work but is much more problematic.

As for Dalembert, this topic comes up over and over. There is no evidence that the Sixers would make that deal nor is it likely the Suns would accept the ugly contracts that the Sixers would inevitably insist on including. Forget Iggy or Korver (a popular throw in). Think Mashburn and you get an idea of what is actually likely to be required to swallow.
 

PhxGametime

Formerly Bball_31
Joined
Jul 27, 2002
Posts
2,010
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
When AK47 got his numbers, they were at the PF position and I'm not sure how saving money comes into it... the team would have to let go Harping and Collins after 1 year. Isn't Collins a FA, BTW?

The Trade would then be AK47 (for a longer contract than Matrix) and the #6/#34 Picks for Matrix, Q, and #21...

I'd rather have the Matrix over AK47. #21 is much better than #34. There is really no big man worth #6 right now, so you're looking at a PG or another wing and I'm not sure Trading 2 starters on a 62 win team to get a better PG at #6 than you can get at #21 is worth it. IF you'e looking to save money?


If the Trade happened, I'm hoping they can keep Harping and Draft a big and forget about saving money... what is the $4-5 million that Harping is going to make. Letting him go, after 1 year swings the favor into the Jazz IMO...

The problem is who's worth #6 but the Pick itself is worth only $2 Million in cash and Channing Frye and Ike Diogu may be reaches but I think I'd rather have Frye/Diogu for $2 Mill than using Mid-Level for $5 Million. That just could be reaching though...


I really do like Felton but the #6 Pick is the deal breaker and this is the best chance to get the rebounder the team needs. Marion is a better rebounder and Q has been a better rebounder than the replacements.

I'm starting to have bad feelings about the Trade now, Frye and Ike are moving up the charts but that could be reaching (I personally like Frye) and as much as I think Felton can fit the role Nash does for the next 10 years, what does the team need most?


I also like Granger but he's still more of a 3/4, although both Granger and AK47 would really give 2 Marionesque athletes at the 4 and then some minutes at the 3. There should be a Poll, on who members would like the Suns to take at #6?
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
As I have wrote many times I don't think the Suns need to get rid of anyone. Marion is honestly one of the top three small forward in the game (3rd team NBA). He was guarding Tim Duncan, one of the top three players overall in the game and someone who was five inches taller than him. Ideally he should've been guarding Bowen and JJ should have guarded Ginoboli. Get a couple of big men to play in the post (SAR, Marshall, Swift) and get a capable PG to give Nash some rest, someone who can play defense would be a plus, and there are our 2005-06 Phoenix Suns.
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,501
Reaction score
964
Location
Gilbert, AZ
overseascardfan said:
As I have wrote many times I don't think the Suns need to get rid of anyone. Marion is honestly one of the top three small forward in the game (3rd team NBA). He was guarding Tim Duncan, one of the top three players overall in the game and someone who was five inches taller than him. Ideally he should've been guarding Bowen and JJ should have guarded Ginoboli. Get a couple of big men to play in the post (SAR, Marshall, Swift) and get a capable PG to give Nash some rest, someone who can play defense would be a plus, and there are our 2005-06 Phoenix Suns.

Again, Shawn Marion did not spend the majority of his time in the San Antonio series guarding Tim Duncan. Bruce Bowen shut him down. That's what happened to Shawn Marion. The Suns don't need to trade Shawn Marion, and everybody here knows they won't trade Shawn Marion... at least not this summer.

Joe Mama
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
i think my point is being missed here. Yes the suns had a 62 win season. NO its not likely that they will have the balls to deal a player as valuable as marion is. MY point is that keeping shawn at the four for anymore time is a detriment to the team. I would rather have a reggie evans type power forward with Q coming off the bench in order to get to the glass (A GLARING GLARING weakness) San Antonio is able to take there staring five and run up and down or play hard nose defense. this is why they are so good. When the suns come into contact with someone who can stop their running game, they need to be able to turn to a different style and play at a successful level. I dont want to blow up a team that won 62 wins but there are issues the team has and they can keep the run and gun identity and still have the horses down low to match up with detroit, indiana, san antonio, and my future fear if they can put together the rockets. Im not sure the suns presently constituted can match up with the kind of seasons i expect those teams to have in the future. so while trading q for a viable big man is not an option, the matrix has ridiculious value around the league. Yeah i like what marion does but ask your self this: should the third and possibly fourth (thats my opinion right there) best player on a team make the max? lets look at the 4th best players on other good teams.

SA: Bowen, or Nazr
Dal: Josh howard
det:tayshaun (they are probaly the exception)
indy:jammal tinsly
miami: freaking udonis haslem!

no doubt this is a bit subjective but I dont give max money to my third/fourth best player and hope to succeed in todays salary cap NBA. Its simply a cost/benefit. MArions cost to the team hinders them from putting together a bench as well as paying those who rightfully deserve it. I am in no ways a marion basher, he earned alot of respect from me this season, yet i want whats best for the team and that is keeping stat and jj happy with money, a big man (amare has stated this is important), and a couple of worthy reserves. You all want these same things but you are not willing to give up any value to get it. If you think the MLE, the 21st pick, combined with the suns being over the cap (projected after extensions are handed out)are going to net some players worthy of real court time come late spring, you are sorely mistaken. suns are right there but dont let getting to the WC finals fool you. We still cant match up with SA and if we dont try to go for it we could end up like the 93 suns who never overtook those damn bulls or rockets.
 

coloradosun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Posts
1,393
Reaction score
0
Az's Finest, I voted no because #6 was not included.

I am in total support of your logic, only if the #6 pick is included. With #6 there are so many options available to replace either Marion or Q; Granger, Graham, Warrick, Diogu or even Vasquez. Flexibility down the road will be important, 5 long term contracts can be devastating if a career ending injury happens to any of the 5.

With AK47 in the lineup with JJ, he can relieve Johnson of his slashing. Q does not have the ball handling skills of Kirilenko. JJ can then take over the number of attempts form the arch that Richardson took and will more than likely convert on a higher percentage. Having Jim Jackson on the roster temporarily counter balances the loss of Q.

The addition of Collins, again, temporarily takes away the need to draft a center, Harpring adds hustle off the bench. I see Harpring a lot like Najera in Denver, the guy is not an offensive threat but just does the dirty work. You have got to have at least one of those guys on the bench.

At #34, Travis Diener should be available, who stood out in the Chicago camp as the best point guard.
 
Last edited:

zett

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Posts
1,249
Reaction score
213
Location
Redding, CA.
The only hitch in this deal is AK47's Health! If he is cleared and there isn't a problem with a reoccuring injury I say do it! If there is any chance of his injury reoccuring then I say no way.
I don't know what the nature of his last injury was, although I'm pretty sure it wasn't the same broken bone he suffered at the beginning of the year. But his presence on defense would be just what the doctor ordered for the suns.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,080
Posts
5,431,479
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top