Wow, Whitehurst cost a lot

[Alan]

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/15707/seahawks-betting-big-on-whitehurst

 

[ReddBird]

Agreed. But, as the article pointed out, competition from Arizona drove up the price.

Good, says I.

 

[mrbyte]

Obviously this guys got something that both the Cards and Seahawks liked ....a lot...

lets hope now he turns out to be a bust

 

[Stout]

Hehe, they're welcome to him! I'm glad they had to pay through the nose too.

 

[az1965]

Agreed. But, as the article pointed out, competition from Arizona drove up the price.

Good, says I.

 

[AZ Native]

Agreed. But, as the article pointed out, competition from Arizona drove up the price.

Good, says I.

Now that is a change of pace for the Arizona Cardinals. We used to be on the wrong side of that equation.

 

[TJ]

That answers the $64 question why we didnt get him.

Makes me feel better

 

[Renz]

Whoa! Dude looks like Kenny Loggins. Glad we didn't sign him.

 

[BullheadCardFan]

Yikes they did give up a lot. Must have really seen something.

 

[Krangodnzr]

I wanted Whitehurst, but that's just WAY too much.

If he works out, it will be a bargain, but that's like only having $1000 to your name and betting $900 at the roulette table. I would have traded a 4th and a future conditional, but damn...