Your Arizona Cardinals now hold the 16th pick in the 2025 NFL Draft

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,594
Reaction score
16,155
Location
Charlotte
Not our highest priority but what if a ball hawk like Xavier Watts is there with our 2nd round pick?
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,670
Reaction score
44,462
Location
Colorado
I understand the thinking but the current group fails to spread the field. That makes it harder to get open on short and medium throws. Too often defenders are able to leave their assignment to support defenders in the area Cards are attacking. Not only does that prevent catches, but it suppresses YAC. The Cards don’t need an awesome deep threat, but they need a competent one.
I think I failed to clarify my stance.

The Cardinals need a specific type of WR, a vertical WR that brings speed and stretches the field. If that WR can also block, they could potentially bump Wilson down the depth chart. If not, probably a 11 personnel only option.

My point is that just any WR is not the answer for the Cardinals.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,670
Reaction score
44,462
Location
Colorado

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
37,926
Reaction score
17,435
Location
Arizona
I have no idea at all where the Cards are going with this pick. 16 is a weird place. Not typically high enough to typically pick up your top 5 player on your draft board but not so far down you can't hope a player you love falls to you.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,964
Reaction score
28,840
Location
Orlando, FL
Grant at pick 30. Is this board overvaluing this guy?

If he is to fall to 30 then a trade back works well for the Cardinals.
It seems every year it gets tougher to evaluate players beyond pick 10. That is where consensus dies. This is one of several polarizing people. The other factor is your looking at mocks and team needs distort those. IMO this is the selection that would impact the Cards the most.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,471
Reaction score
2,509
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
It seems every year it gets tougher to evaluate players beyond pick 10. That is where consensus dies. This is one of several polarizing people. The other factor is your looking at mocks and team needs distort those. IMO this is the selection that would impact the Cards the most.
I'm listening to DJs podcast (most insider/ "tangible rumors") and Check the Mic (most down into detail and metrics) for my insider.

Both podcast have mentioned this and says this draft is by far the hardest to predict ever, because the 2nd tier is so big without much separation in terms of talent level.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,670
Reaction score
44,462
Location
Colorado
Matthew Golden is probably the 1 WR the Cardinals would consider in the first two rounds. He fits the need even if I like other players better and doubt Monti goes WR back to back years.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
19,166
Reaction score
17,846
Location
Modesto, California
This is interesting...things to consider at pick 16 and beyond
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

HairZach

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Posts
1,627
Reaction score
3,383
Location
VA
that would be a disappointing result: taking a guard while really good edge and DT prospects remain on the board
I feel the same way, but I can talk myself into it. Daniel Jerimiah is very well informed, I think he knows who we want. He had us trading out of 3 with the Texans and taking Paris at 12. He called us taking Zaven as well.

Heres another way to look at it. Pass rushers and DTs in the 16-32 range bust hard every year.
Look at 2023: Tyree Wilson (7), Will McDonald (16), Luka Van Ness (13) Mazi Smith (26), Myles Murphy (28), Bryan Bresee (29), FAU (31) have ranged from below average to terrible so far.
From 2024, Dallas Turner (17) and Laitu Latu (15) were disappointing at best as rookies. In 2022 Jordan Davis (13) has quietly been considered a semi-bust by the Eagles, he was envisioned to turn into a 3 down guy, but became the 4th DT in their rotation.

This is considered a strong IOL draft and we would be getting the first guy off the board. If he's really good what team actually regrets building up the trenches? Zabel's comp is Alijah Vera Tucker, and I certainly wouldnt mind drafting that. The unfortunate reality is the Seahawks got a monster on the inside in Byron Murphy II, and we need someone elite to counter him.

Here is Daniel Jerimiah's write up on Zabel: "Zabel is a versatile offensive lineman with excellent toughness and awareness. He lined up at left tackle in 2024, but he has played four O-line positions during his collegiate career. I believe he’s best suited to play guard at the next level. In pass pro, he has quick feet, stays square and catches/absorbs rushers. His lack of length shows up on the perimeter. He allows defenders to capture his chest, but he still possesses the core strength and balance to stall their push. He shows the savvy to snatch rushers when they get overextended. I love his ability to fit up and drive defenders in the run game. He has a great feel on combo blocks, and he always looks to finish. He has a nasty playing style, but he doesn’t get caught off-balance. Overall, I see Zabel as a Day 1 starter at guard."

He just sounds like someone we are going to draft.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
DVontel

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,702
Reaction score
24,830
Daniel Jerimiah is very well informed, I think he knows who we want.
This is usually true when it’s his very last mock before the draft.

This isn’t his very last mock before the draft.
 
OP
OP
DVontel

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,702
Reaction score
24,830
But yea, no. Drafting a comp of Alijah Vera Tucker is more the reason to not drafting a Guard in the 1st round. Could probably convince me if the comp was Chris Lindstrom.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
23,354
Reaction score
42,861
Location
UK
This is interesting...things to consider at pick 16 and beyond
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

That's interesting because those top 2 guys are both my favorite non 1st round Edge guys. Film matches the stats.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
23,354
Reaction score
42,861
Location
UK
So I had a look at the roster composition for the last 2 years to see where the holes are and then looked at the current roster to see where we had players locked in either due to contract or draft status.

QB - 2 - This room is set
RB - 4 - There are only really 2 sets guys in Conner and Benson. We can get $2.4m cap savings on Deejay if we draft an upside RB who can kick return.
WR - 6 - We only really have 4 guys for a 6 player room. Weaver and Palmer are easy PS moves. I'd expect a draft pick and a vet here.
TE - 4 - Another option. Vokolek as TE4 is easily replaceable with a lower round pick.
OL - 10 - Another room with much room, only 8 guys have a chance at the 53, and could be 7 if you discount Gaines. Would expect vet and draft additions.
DL - 6 - 5 guys are absolute locks. Collier can be cut/traded for just a $750k hit.
OLB - 5 - This room looks set depending on how you see XT. I don't see Monti moving on a 5th round pick after a year but it's an option if he loves someone.
ILB - 3 - Only kept 3 last year and already have 4. May see one of those OL spots drop and only keep 9, which they have done before. Pappoe is an option to go if the love someone.
CB - 6 - There are 5 locks here. Clarke is the odd man out if they love someone.
S - 4 - 4 locks here with Blount as a special teams ace.
ST - 3 - ST's are set

Looking at what we have now WR and OL are easily are two biggest needs.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
571,805
Posts
5,504,222
Members
6,341
Latest member
AZRoughRider
Top