They wouldn't have to, they'd have already scored on the ground.100% of the QBs could make that through against our D though
They wouldn't have to, they'd have already scored on the ground.100% of the QBs could make that through against our D though
While I don't fully agree, I respect your opinions here and agree with a lot of what you say.Yeah, my main issue with Kyler is how bad he plays when the offensive line sucks. And let's be honest, the offensive line sucked on Sunday against a BAD pass rush. When Kyler doesn't trust his protection, he becomes a one-read quarterback, pre-determines where the ball is going to go before the snap, and rushes everything.
Once the team has rebuilt the trenches, has respectable play from the OL and DL, has a decent pass rush, if Kyler still can't get it done then we can bring somebody else in and they will have a good foundation to start with.
If we replace the quarerback now and still have crappy trenches, we only make things worse and probably ruin ANOTHER prospect.
Ah, what a fail. You see, he made a reasonable post, even if I can't agree in totality. Fair points rather than just "Kyler's awesome, neener neener" crap.Hold on, you can't make good critiques like this without yelling K1 is terrible and needs to not be here.
Go back and redo this.
I’m not ready to fire Petzing yet
Why not, coordinators are a dime a dozen in the NFL? They are changed out like underwear if they aren't successful right away.I’m not ready to fire Petzing yet
I've seen enough good and creative stuff (or been told he was doing good and creative stuff) that I'm not ready to turn the page.Why not, coordinators are a dime a dozen in the NFL? They are changed out like underwear if they aren't successful right away.
Top QBs enable that.I've seen enough good and creative stuff (or been told he was doing good and creative stuff) that I'm not ready to turn the page.
Petzing was on the preseason head coach shortlist going into training camp; we're a top 15 offense in points and yardage and top 5 in rushing YPA and yardage.
Do the most successful teams constantly change out their coordinators? Stability can help a team.Why not, coordinators are a dime a dozen in the NFL? They are changed out like underwear if they aren't successful right away.
Top QBs enable that.
You mean when the QB is taking on more responsibility for running the offense?His play calling midway through the end of games is worrying.
There's a read-option in there that I don't know if I'd classify as a called rush either.All I hear from Murray is that he can basically only do what plays the coaches call. Uh, if you are THE franchise QB feel free to use your head and go a different way if you see the defense giving you something or you think you can run it yourself. He talks like a yes man that only does what he is told. Meh.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Right?All I hear from Murray is that he can basically only do what plays the coaches call. Uh, if you are THE franchise QB feel free to use your head and go a different way if you see the defense giving you something or you think you can run it yourself. He talks like a yes man that only does what he is told. Meh.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
That is my thought. the opening scripts have been very good. Hopefully the issues after are just Kyler and Petzing doing a better job of continuing to hammer what is working, and then pivot when the other teams adjust. That said, almost more of a Kyler issue than a Petzing issue.You mean when the QB is taking on more responsibility for running the offense?
The opening game scripts have been pretty effective even last season. I don't know if they don't have enough plays installed or what, but it seems like they run out of ideas really fast. Whatever the reason it is a team failure.