Everyone shoots thier mouths off differently to the refs. Maybe Amare should watch Duncan and see how he gets away with it and learn something. I dont remember anything obvious to where Duncan was supposed to get a tech anyway.
But complaining is complaining and if the rules are to be enforced the way it is written in the rule book then he should be punished. They said that the suspensions of Amare and Diaw was due to enforcement of a rule.
So why do they pick and choose the rest of the rules that they enforce? It doesn't make any sense.
The Suns don't get calls because of the PERCEPTION that they are a soft team while the spurs get away with it due to their REPUTATION. Rules shouldn't be enforced based on reputation or perception but they are and that's a problem that the league needs to address.
Unfortunately, Stern has his head so far up his ass that he doesn't recognize the faults with the league and watches as it goes on a steady decline.
Why even bring that up? Thats a feeble copout statement grasping at straws that fans bring up all the time...You said yourself there was no altercation so its a moot point.
1) To further show that the league is getting to the point to promoting thuggery. Tim Duncan and Bowen were on the court with the intent of being involved in an altercation but because James Jones decided not to kick Elson's teeth in, they receive no punishment even though their intent was the same as Amare and Diaw's. Common sense would say that they should have been punished as well.
However this league has shown time and again they don't have common sense.
2) There is no definition for the rule they enforced. What is an altercation? What is the vicinity of the bench? Without the definitions, you can't have iron clad enforcement that would make any sense.
3) Give a demonstration of how scared the league is of Duncan. He was on the court during play yet he has yet to receive any punishment whatsoever. No T, No fine, no suspension. Absolutely nothing. Its an embarassing joke that shows the league definitely has favoritism with certain players and teams which is what leads to the poor perception of the league and the conspiracy theories.
Kinda hard to ignore how rules are enforced for some and not for others
It does seem right to me because the elbow, the way Nash came down and jumped up in a confrontational way, and other players coming over made it appear to be an altercation. Horry was suspended two games for it and it should have ended there not with our players clearing the bench to become some sort of half backed bodyguards/onlookers.
Again we're back to the definition thing. They don't have a definition for a rule that they are trying to strictly enforce.
You say it was an altercation, I disagree. There was no fight other then an elbow given by Horry. So why should a minor player be rewarded for two cheap shots?
Like many in the media and fans have pointed out, it doesn't make sense and the league will continue to go downhill if it keeps going where its going.