What makes you repeatedly call this a weak draft? IMO, this is NOT a weak draft, at least not in the way you keep using these words. This draft is very light at the top but it's actually a pretty DEEP draft. Steve
I am using the term weak draft the same as every NBA prognosticator does. If anything I am confused at your definition. You are the first person I have come across calling this draft deep. Almost every draft special I have watched so far and the articles I have read also call this a weak draft. Some samples:
"Critics are calling this one of the weakest NBA draft"
"next week's NBA draft isn't considered particularly strong"
"But the clubs that capitalize on a weak draft will be in the best position to be stronger later."
"Draftniks are tagging this as a weak draft,"
"Kyrie Irving and Derrick Williams are without a doubt the two best prospects in this very weak draft class."
"The 2011 NBA draft is a weak one."
I could go on for days. The conventional wisdom is this is a weak draft and I agree. What makes me repeat this is the very same reason most people keep repeating it.
Compare this draft to some recent drafts where you have multiple all-stars or guys that look like they will be future all-stars towards the top. Those same drafts are full of guys that can still make an impact in the later picks and really talented guys end up falling in the teens. The type of players late in this years 1st round are the type of guys that would probably fall into the 2nd round of a deep draft. Meaning there is alot more talent to be had overall in the draft when those types of players can be had in later in the draft.
This draft is not the same. Many of these guys will end up being journeyman type players or bench warmers. The draft is riddled with guys that are projects IMO. There are a higher number of project players in this draft then many deep drafts. That is the very definition of a weak draft.
Last edited: