slinslin
Welcome to Amareca
Clearly, the Suns could have had Hill for their pick. Would that have been a good move?
No Hill can't do anything besides hit open corner 3s.
Clearly, the Suns could have had Hill for their pick. Would that have been a good move?
And Marcus will be even worse defensively so what is your point? If Markieff doesn't translate defensively, his brother sure as hell won't because he was clearly the inferior defender. Given the two players, you still have to pick Markieff. Again, not a game changer but there was none of those players left anyway.
Clearly, the Suns could have had Hill for their pick. Would that have been a good move?
That Marcus at least has offensive moves and can play the 3.
No Hill can't do anything besides hit open corner 3s.
Markieff was the Prospect I liked the least (in my top 40).
would you rather have Brooks over George Hill?
There were plenty of players inferior in your top 40 then defensively. Was defense and rebounding not part of your criteria?
That's what's pissing me off. Everyone cries about defense and rebounding, but when the Suns picks someone who can defend and rebound, they complain about it.
I don't think that's it at all. I think there's a question about how much he can defend and rebound.
Markieff is slow, short and not athletic.
How many players like that are known for their defense in the NBA.
Markieff is slow, short and not athletic.
How many players like that are known for their defense in the NBA. Markieffs best case is probably a Drew Gooden like career or Brian Cardinal.
Ridiculous and 100% false. Athleticism is usually reserved for guys that dunk and run up and down the floor. There are a ton of bruisers in the NBA that are defenders and not knows for athleticism or quickness.
Where do you get this crap?
Yes.
Markieff is slow, short and not athletic.
How many players like that are known for their defense in the NBA. Markieffs best case is probably a Drew Gooden like career or Brian Cardinal.