- Joined
- Jan 2, 2003
- Posts
- 92,047
- Reaction score
- 70,110
Then why do u have to get 2 feet down? Hmmmm
Contradicts the rule IMO
one knee has pretty much always been considered two feet.
Then why do u have to get 2 feet down? Hmmmm
Contradicts the rule IMO
one knee has pretty much always been considered two feet.
one knee has pretty much always been considered two feet.
Those two missed field goals for NO are looming large right now.
Not according to the rules!!! http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/forwardpass
That is my understanding too.
Not according to the rules!!! http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/forwardpass
bucky is that really the first time you've ever seen that call?
No, but it isn't always called the same cheese. Like I said it contradicts the rules of having 2 feet in vs one. You either do or you don't
Explain logically to me why one knee should equal 2 feet? IMO there isn't any logic cheese. Does 1 arm down & no feet down equal a catch?
Tell me where it does say that it is a reception?
I don't see Seattle winning the SB. They have NO passing game at all!!
Tell me where it does say that it is a reception?
A knee or an elbow down with possession always matters. Always. So, when the receiver's knee touched the field of play, with possession AND the defender touching the receiver, the receiver was down.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You must be registered for see images
WTH ???
He scores a TD, recovers the onside kick, and then throws the game away all in a short span of time.
That was really bad!
You must be registered for see images